(Kensho experiences tend to be briefer glimpses, while satori is considered to be a … It is therefore customary to use the word satori, rather than kensho  (www.answer.com on the subject of satori) .

This is such a Saturday Post (ha, ha age restricted pun)…the beginning of the Post refers to a Comment submitted by glenn about ‘seeing the rabbit’.  You will find it in the Comments section to the Post (“on the other hand there is something to be said for the stupid approach“).  You really should  go back and read it, that way this Post will make sense (yeah, right!).  In any event, we want to thank glenn for his contribution (and DownSpring#1 for requesting he tell the story and Ms. AKH for a little scottian heel-nipping that helped keep him ‘on book’.)  Good job, yo.

Even if it is Saturday, no need to get all metaphysical on yer asses.  Better you remember when you were a kid and summer vacations were a whole season of time off.  Weekends were so weird during summer vacation.  Sure they were still days off (for everyone else) but no real impact for you.  So it is for us here at the Doctrine.  We have the time when you are supposed to take it easy (kinda northamerican culturally biased, but hey…send us a Comment that gives us a different cultural/geo/demo perspective and we will include it.) Maybe.  (I feel a Wakefield Doctrine Lesson of the Day comin on.)

You all remember that the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) is ‘culture neutral’ , right?  Well, it is.  What got me thinking about it was the reference to Summer vacation and being a kid and all.  In theory those in the southern hemisphere wax rhapsodic about the days of winter vacation, fishin’ and canoein’ down the lazy Amazon, catchin piranha in a jar to take home to you Mom (or Mommesita/Momagato/Mom<click>mom).  I guess, can’t really say for sure, but I do know that even if you are campin in the back yard in December or whenever, you would do this thing.
But the point is, no matter what culture you are reading this from the perspective of, you are a (clark, scott or roger) and you are living with (clarks, scotts and rogers). You want to know how I can make that statement? “Potomu chto Wakefield Doktrina govorit tak …” that’s how, yo.  I mean you think the Slovenians were here just for the fun of it? (Well partly…but while they came for fun, they stayed to learn).

The only accommodation I can think of  for cultural differences would only benefit the people trying to see the clarks, scotts and rogers (in their world).  In a more patriarchal culture you will see the scotts clearer (but, here is an interesting point) you will also see the scottian women way quicker too!  Since all all patriarchs are not scotts, the role of the matriarch becomes much more important.  As we have previously established about scottian females and their rogerian males ( “Couples in Love” Ms. AKH), you will see this perhaps more clearly in a culture which retains prominent roles for the “mother/father” thing in the basic family unit.
(There will also be an interesting shift in regards to clarklike women in an older matriarchal setting than say in an amphibious culture (thanks to rogers for that last expression).

Anyway, this is frickin Saturday!  What the hell are you doing here?  Oh, yeah  reading about the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers.  Good Readers!  Take a penny, please.

So the Lesson of the Day is: today at play…the person most anxious to stop reading this and get outside and just “do something” is most likely a scott. (And you, if you are still reading this are v likely a clark).  Don’t be concerned but pay attention.
When you see a roger or a scott or a clark you will be seeing them by themselves,  actually if you are seeing a roger, there will be a herd around them, if you see a scott, there will be a herd running away from them and if you see a clark…then everyone will be receding away from (he or she) at an equal rate.

Music?  Oh yeah we gots music. (You know, in way it is good that the Wakefield Doctrine is not yet wildly successful, being such a tiny, near insignificant presence in the blogosphere sort of allows me to do the youtube thing with a clearer consciousness.  However, going forward you will see an increasing presence of some sort of attribution to all the shit I find out there.  Hey, thanks anonymous supporting members of the Wakefield Doctrine.

Listen to this guy.  Talk about your doing an original version of someone else’s song.  Damn

(Somebody say, ‘Yeah! but we want music that is so ’80s that we will put 16 ozs of gel in our hair and have unprotected sex in an urban, slightly eastern European setting like everyone did in the 1980s…)

Oh! alright then

Sorry, the joke above about unprotected sex would have been funny if I had been able to present an original version of the music video….but nooo the people who own the “rights” to the “video”…don’t want “me” to present it to all you “Readers”…well fuck them here is a more updated version….(in the older video it opens with the band in the blown-out windows of some abandoned factory-looking building…she does have spandex and (the rest of the band) as hair gel…as to the unprotected sex, well I don’t have “proof” that that is what “they” “did” back then but I wouldn’t put it past ’em (attribution here to Justin Greene, a comic artist from the 1970s, ask me about him sometime).