the Wakefield Doctrine | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [a Rosetta and the Sophomore Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

 

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, constrained by a sentence limit (high and low) of six, there are worse ways to spend the remaining time you have on earth.

Previously…

Prompt word:

FLY

“What?”

“If you even think about making a joke or otherwise laughing this off, I’ll say, in the spirit of your putative ability to time travel, “to the moon, Ethan…to the moon.”

The Sophomore held both hand, fingers upwards, one palm facing his companion, the other back to himself; it was a gesture neither one of supplication nor surrender; rather one of acceptance, “But before you reach for your Glock, I rarely remember my dreams, even nightmares and I’m really sorry if you were disturbed by it.”

“Disturbed?!”

“So how bad was I, during the nightmare, Rose?”

“You were talking out loud, turning your head to the side every few seconds so it was clear you were driving in a car in your dream; fuckin Marcel Marciano’s got nothing on you when it comes to nonverbal communication; until, that is, you started screaming about a girl thrown from the car as it rolled over, watching her fly through the dark night.”

 

*

Share

Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

…so a clark, a scott and roger walk into a popular restaurant a little before 11:45 one Wednesday afternoon

(thanks to Misky for today’s post thesis (ish))

Damn, we’ve been writing this blog for so long now that the above phrase might qualify as a trope. At least for those tens of Readers who have visited this blog over the last thirty-five hundred posts.

In fact, given the lateness of this writing, we will search for a RePrint that addresses this manifestation of the three predominant worldviews and their distinctly different experience in a common situation.

…hold on

ok… well, kinda

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “… of development, writers clubs and understanding the world around us.”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Do we outgrow the past or do we simply forget? Do the improvements, growth and developments we achieve (through effort, ambition and circumstance) become like, well, the way it is.

We admit to a fondness for the occasional peculiar word or phrases that, although uncommon in everyday conversation, are fun. Today (in light of the opening sentences) the fun word/phrase/expression is raison dêtre. (which our friends at wikipedia define as  “…a French expression commonly used in English, meaning “reason for being” or “reason to be”.”)

The Wakefield Doctrine is the reason for the existence of this blog. All, and only, because it hit me one night that it would be good to ‘formalize’ my personal system for explaining the world and the people in it.

The Wakefield Doctrine holds that we are, all of us, born with the potential to experience the world as one of three characteristic realities. At an early age we ‘pick’ one of these three ‘worldviews’ and we are on our way to becoming clarks, scotts or rogers. The Wakefield Doctrine, as a personality ‘theory’, is not concerned with how you would describe yourself, the results of questionnaires created to identify traits and interests or even what you think that girl is doing sitting out there in the middle of the field looking back towards the house filled with people she may or may not be related to (well, sometimes we enjoy the traditional approaches; I mean, damn! give yourself away in one description much, clark? lol). Unlike other tools developed by psychology, sociology and phrenology, tools easily transposed to popular media such as ‘the Face Book’ where they lie, attractively packaged, club-shaped mirrors waiting for someone to notice, “Oh, honey! Come here! I found this personality test in my magazine and it so has you down to a T! Lets take it together. You first.”

Central to the hypothesis of the Wakefield Doctrine is the notion that we all live in a reality that is, to a certain degree, personal. Nothing weird, mystical or magical. Simply that if you and I are standing in front of the entrance to, say, a very popular restaurant, our experience of that moment will not be identical. The Doctrine takes this and jumps up above the individual and says, ‘Suppose the world was one in which individuals are separated from each other in a way not easily discernible or, better still, imagine that the life we wake up into after each sleep is that of the Predator, simple and direct, eat or be eaten; or suppose everything in the world is knowable and, to a degree established in a way that allows for complete agreement among like-minded people, that the universe is, in fact, definable and quantifiable.’

This is key to understanding the Doctrine. Children (you, me and the girl behind the counter asking if that’ll be Regular or Premium) all grow and develop (their) personalities in order to successfully interact with the environment that surrounds them. Social, physical, the whole thing. And this is done in the context of the nature and character of the world, as they experience it. These strategies evolve and develop into the style we refer to as our ‘personality type’.

I grew up in the world of the Outsider (clark). I developed a way of relating to the people and the world around me that permits me to stay out of the limelight (can’t have people pointing at me and telling everyone that we don’t belong) while at the same time giving me the tools and the drive to search for whatever it was that I didn’t learn when I was too young to realize it i.e. how to be a real person.

A friend of mine grew up in the reality of the Predator (scott). She’s a lot of fun to be around, gets more done in a morning than most people do in a week. She is always on alert, never is not paying attention to whats going on around her and everyone likes her…except for the ones who are terrified of her. Temperament is often un-fairly pronounced with the accent entirely on the first syllable… we prefer the word: mercurial. You want something done right away, you ask her and step out-of-the-way.

If you want that thing done right… you find my friend who grew up in the life of the Herd Member (roger). He will know how to do it so that the joints line up, the glue doesn’t stick out at the ends and it stays the way it’s supposed to be… forever. He knows the simple fact of the life that there’s a Right Way.  No, nothing as an alternative, no second-runner-up. One way. Fortunately, my friend has so many other people around him that grew up knowing that they all belong. Sure there’s minor disagreements over decor, but it’s all one big hap…. Herd. The world is good. Just have to understand.

*

Share

Teisdat -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Thank god for Friends of the Doctrine!

In yesterday’s Post we mentioned Cynthia, (a leading Doctrine scholar), and one of her comments had Post Theme written all over it’s own bad self.

to wit:

Hmm. You taking up piano, Clark? Is that a clark-like instrument, because I am re-learning to play. Haha. I remember Roger saying he plays the guitar. Is that a more rogerian instrument? And something LOUD would be perfect for the Scotts. My brother in law is learning the fiddle. If he were younger, I’d bet my money on drums or…trombones

New Readers! It is entirely acceptable to me asking yourself… ‘What does she mean?’

Well, be patient! She is talking about the Wakefield Doctrine and, as you should know by now, is: an additional perspective on the world around us and the people who make it up. And…and! rather than a bunch of silly letters (Oscar Myers, we’re looking at you) or semi-embarrassing made up stuff (Latency Period, really Sigmund? you’re gonna go with the hand-the-adolescent-boys-a-freebie?), we have the very simple standard: How does the person relate themselves to the world? There are three personality types in the Wakefield Doctrine:

  • clarks (the Outsider)
  • scotts (the Predator)
  • rogers (the Herd Member)

fine.

Our correspondent Cynthia’s Comment is raising the issue of which musical instrument is most in simpatico with which personality type?1

…damn! out of time! tune in tomorrow for the conclusion of out lecture: ‘Music Performance and What the Heck is She Doing?!?!’

*interesting footnote: the story is (from a video of Joe Walsh talking about starting out) that one of his first instruments was ….the trombone!  Hey! Good illustration of a scott. Now the host of the show, Daryl Hall? (we’re thinking clark, possible roger)

 1  of course, she does not mean that only one type is attracted to or otherwise drawn to one particular instrument. The Everything Rule allows that ‘everyone does everything. at one time or another‘. And so, while guitar, (in particular lead guitar), is a very effective choice in manifesting how a scott relates themselfs to the world, clarks can be effective with it as well, e.g. Jeff Beck. The key value of the Everything Rule is to remind us consider what an individual, in their handling of an instrument, tell us about how they relate to the world.

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

sorry about the missed Doctrine post last Monday (and an unsteady beginning to the Week of Snow).

As we all know, Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, (with an option on Friday), are days we write about the Wakefield Doctrine. Thursday, (with an option on Friday), are for our stories in the Six Sentence Story format.

We are very fortunate to have Readers who are also students of the Wakefield Doctrine. And their Comments, invaluable inspiration for these ‘What is this Doctrine’ type post, are very appreciated.

This week we have a Comment from Mimi that effectively jumpstarts our first Doctrine post of the week. Misky, Denise and Cynthia are among the others who we count on to express their reactions, responses, interpretations and general feedback,

So, last Friday, in a Comment on a Doctrine post (sub)titled: ‘Leftovers, Binyons‘ Mimi, she be sayin

Assuming you know what others are thinking is natural when almost all you do is think!

Yes. And what this observation does is serve to remind us that, by virtue of the fact that everyone exists in one of three personal realities, it would behoove us to not assume the other person is experiencing the given situation the same as do we.

Continuing with this thought* it is evident, by our own correspondent’s admission to being a clark1 she could accept the idea that the other person might (mostly likely) be a scott or a roger.

So, back to the original Post, Amy would do well, upon realization that she was dealing with either a scott or a roger, to set aside her expectations for being understood and, instead make an effort to translate what the other person is saying, in the language-mode of their predominant worldview.

Lots of opportunity to reduce stress (for clarks), enhance one’s enjoyment of the moment (for scotts) and feel more confident (as a roger always seeks to do).

That should get us started on the week.

Remember: do not assume, despite being in a direct interaction…in the same damn room! that the other person is having the same experience as you.

Program Notes: No, there are not three alien worlds competing for our attention. There is the common world of everyday reality. It is only on a small, but still significant lever that we experience the world as a clark or a scott or a roger.

*see??! See?? lol

  1. clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

You see it, don’t you? (Grat 7 for a hint)*

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s weekly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. First published in the Winter of 1895 by Lizzi R, the TToT has remained a most esteemed of what came to be known as Grat Blogs. While originally printed on yellow-lined foolscap folio, eventually someone decided that hardcopy had certain limitations and invented the internet and, immediately afterwords, the blogosphere.

Hey! March is Open Recruitment Month for Hosts and Hostinae. If you know a blogger you feel would be a good fit, tell us. For that matter, if, at this moment you’re thinking, “I could do that! Whatever ‘that’ is…sure, these Hostinae (and Host) seem like reasonable people. (ok, a slight reservation on those Doctrine people, serially, a robot in a movie from the mid-1950s?!?) But the rest of them seem… cool. Maybe I will send in my name.”

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine (sine qua non, y’all, sine qua non))

4) the Six Sentence Story bloghop

5) again, and surely one of the primary Grats shared by us all: relatively-good health (sufficient to remove accumulated frozen water from the driveway)

6) modern technology, specifically, having a motion picture camera in our portable telephone

7)  * What we sorta saw on our deck. Hey, it wasn’t just us, Phyllis saw it too! (ok, she would admit to seeing a figure (tribute and proof of her having a significant secondary clarklike aspect.) We thought about asking her to play the Anne Francis part… but decided not to (clarks may be crazy, but we’re not insane).

8) something, something

9) walking (P.) to the cottage on a winter’s night

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

music

*

*

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share