the Wakefield Doctrine | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 11 the Wakefield Doctrine | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 11

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, there is a single rule: the story is to have six sentences; no more and no less.

(Not for nothin’ but I’m hoping there is a Reader with as great a tenure as we have that can name the TV show in the above photo.)

Prompt word:

PANEL

“We just got your CBC panel back from the lab.”

The man in the examining room not wearing a white lab coat, with or without blue-stitched lettered name: Dr. G Moore  ‘Internal Medicine’, felt the room’s ambient temperature drop.

A third person, though not wearing a coat, did display a name tag; Jayne; an odd spelling, but consistent with the aggressively phonetic convention embraced by the current generation of parents; it echoed a forgotten memory.

“Everything looks fine, I’m quite pleased.”

Remembering his manners, the older man stood and extended his hand, a gesture seemingly as archaic as his respectfully-silent attention; the physician nodded and Jayne, for her part, smiled an impossible combination of polite interest and generic affection favored by her generation.

The patient, the one lacking an embroidered lab coat or the natural ease available on short-term loan to the young, began to speak, but the door was already open and the doctor was following his clipboard to another room and another patient sitting alone, balancing on the edge of the future.

 

Share

Wedbesdat -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘lets just try an’ limber up the key-touchers’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Given our heightened alertness, indicated by the letter-salad in the title, we’d be wise to find and post a RePrint post.

That being said…

Hey! Did you know that, when all is said and done, the arena of the Wakefield Doctrine is that of personal reality. Furthermore, (ah! surely a word that sounds like a Dickensian demand but, with a certain, cultured elegance), this personal reality is as magical/metaphysical/subjective and/or intellectually-indulgent as anyone could hope for.

Back in the very early days of this blog, we used to posit that there is a Realm of the Outsider, a Zone of Predation, a Ecosystem of the Herd. And we meant it. Hell, we still do, but let’s keep that between ourselfs, ok? No sense spooking any New Readers, before they can get a grasp on the three predominant worldviews.

… but the thing is, and we’re comfortable stating it, knowing the demographic of the typical Wakefield Doctrine aficionados/afficionadae, it helps to maintain the belief that reality is personal, if for no other reason than that position makes it more likely to consider alternate perspectives. And alternate perspectives are the gateway-view of the world that allows one to identify with another person.

But, it’s Wednesday and we’ve already said too much.

Except this: the single greatest benefit of taking up with this Wakefield Doctrine crowd(lette) is that we have found others to identify with. (Of course, this little revelation tells you what our predominant worldview. This belief is validated by the realities of ‘the other two’: one always knows where their pack is and the other is never without a Herd. We’re tempted to use the childishly fun word, oxymoron, in describing clarks and belonging, so we won’t.)

The three predominant worldviews of the Wakefield Doctrine:

  1. clarks (the Outsider) reality is informed by a childhood of being different and apart from; we begin the twin campaigns of avoiding scrutiny and learning what others clearly know about belonging
  2. scotts (the Predator) life is an adventure and, like most fictional adventures, is characterized by highs and lows, risk and reward and the endless chase of the unattainable
  3. rogers (the Herd Member) life is as good as the echo of those around you

*

 

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

People are always coming up to us, on the street, peristalsing through school corridors between classes, in the lull of a amatory pre-peak and asking, they ask, “Why are you still writing posts on your personality theory? We get it, and are amazed you don’t fall asleep at the keyboard, all morning-foggy, poster on the wall reflecting the LED glare, (the one showing Fabió flying towards a mountain-top castle where Helen Bonham Carter is semaphoring for help and across the top ‘It Was a Dark and Stormy Knight…)

One word: New Readers

We promise not to invoke Tennessee Williams other than to say, Readers from Mimi, to Cynthia, Denise to Kristi  often write Comments that remind us to keep it simple and stick with the basics. Then, with their implied permission, a quick cut ‘n paste into a blank post and we’re off and runnin’

Last week, Misky wrote such a Comment. So,

“…figuring out which of three, or two or all three, people are if I don’t know them well. How do I anticipate a person’s response to the world if I don’t know them particularly well.”

Perfect set up! (Thanks!)

The beauty part, (as Lou Collins used to say), of the Doctrine is that we don’t need to know them that well. Hell, at all well. The biographical facts of the person in front of us, (or the one reflected in a mirror), are not the most important thing. Knowing the three relationships with the world that is the heart of the Wakefield Doctrine  is…are… whatever.

The question, (at least when we are starting out practicing everyone’s favorite personality theory….theory), is not, ‘Which of the three is this person?’ The best (in the sense of being efficacious to our true goal*) is ‘On the basis of what I observe, see, feel from this person, which of the three makes more sense. Is most consistent with… (Look up the optometrist metaphor (somewhere in the pile of posts). …ok. we couldn’t find it either.

In a nutshell, (no, ceayr… not a word!), consider an eye test. The optometrist turns off the lights, flicks a switch and a bright rectangle appears on the opposite wall. Lowering a very cool, in a totally steampunk sorta way, mechanism with two lenses for you to look through, they say, “Read the first line you can comfortably see.” (one eye goes dark); “Now, is this clearer? [click], How about this?” Back and forth. That is what we do with the three perspectives of the Wakefield Doctrine.

We observe the behavior/dress/appetite, whatever, and look through the lens of: the Outsider (clark) … [click] the Herd Member (roger) [click] Is this clearer, i.e. makes more sense or [click] is this…

…as a wise woman once said, “That’s how it began.”

 

* The tool that the Wakefield Doctrine is, is focused on our being better able to ‘see the world as the other person is experiencing it’. (italics quite deliberate… remind us to discuss personal reality tomorrow.)

 

*

Share

Un-reliable Fridae -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Unicorn Challenge bloghop.

As is incumbent upon us, this being Friday and all, we proffer a story from the picture that we saw. jenne and ceayr watch with evident glee and all the mad bloggers submit their tales to thee. yea celebrate, it’s the ‘hop that all await, the Unicorn Challenge photo prompt.

 

“Who’s there?”

The woman’s voice hesitated, the slightest up-lilt on the interrogative, a child’s invocation for the closet to be as empty as her parents promised. The scenery had, in some tectonic conspiracy, become a threatening vista. The moors’ rolling green looked mostly solid. The gurgling stream ran a parallel track and not, actually, a serpentine course. The mountains on the horizon seemed devoid of jagged cliffs, as clouds gathered like sentient tendrils to the foothills.

Awareness of her surroundings, because she’d stopped, reminded her how much she valued being away from overly-protective family; it was her favorite activity.

“God, please don’t deprive me this time wandering these hills.” As alone as she was, the old woman kept her prayer silent.

Gazing downwards, a slight cold bubbled somewhere between her belt and her heart.

Her new walking sticks had a pleasant …balance; the rawhide straps, lined with suede, held her wrists in a friend’s embrace. The ends of the rods, upon attaining optimal extension, pulled her along. Ever so slightly.

Suddenly, the stick in her left hand slipped backwards. However, as the inspired design and balance dictated, the right side moved forward in counter-balance, saving her from a fall.

The chill within began to crystallize as the temporary imbalance resulted in her taking a step further along the road. The friend’s grasp of the wrist straps tightened. She stepped another step along the road, discovering something worse than falling to the pavement… walking into the fog that waited patiently. Endlessly.

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s weakly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT). Now in Stereo!! (Well, kinda, there is this post and another over on Blogger which is posted also on the TToT Facebook group Page!)

For us at the Doctrine, the following people. places and things qualify for inclusion in our citations for sources of feeling a sense of gratitude this week.

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Six Sentence Story bloghop.  Six Pick of the week:  …[a Café Six]  (the) the Wakefield Doctrine

5) the Unicorn Challenge   Read this one!  ‘Afternoon Tea‘   by jenne

6) modern technology. in this case cameras in phones, i.e. Front meadow in October

7) have we mentioned the Wakefield Doctrine? No, not merely in the context of a long-running blog, the stewardship of which we’ve been privileged to provide service, in this citation, as a Grat Item, we note that, as a tool to self-improve oneself, it is without peer. (Slow to take effect? Sure. Worth the effort. Gotta go with a ‘damn straight’)

8) something, something

9) Having a profession (real estate brokerage) that includes free Membership to an impromptu health club (and totally stationary StairMaster) lol A property I have in Norwich CT:

10) Secret Rule 1.3

music(ish) vids

*

something a little different to start us off

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share