self-development | the Wakefield Doctrine

Twewsdae -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Before we continue our discussion of scotts that began in yesterday’s post, a word about the more subtle appreciation of the principles (and personalities) of the Wakefield Doctrine.

Before we continue from Misky‘s Comment, consider the following, (cue Al Pacino, ‘This is our gift to you’), description of a clark (from our WIP ‘Blog Dominion’):

‘Tom was one of those people who managed to maintain a crippling dependency on the approval of others without, somehow, surrendering any autonomy.’

cool right?

And now to our scottian friends

A right busy little (Scott scottian*) bee, eh? I like the image of the leaping dog…

Very much on-target. We always had/have fun with the metaphorical social paradigm of the dog, (especially a puppy) for the carefree, live-in-the-now relationship that defines the predominant worldview of the Predator (scott).

But you’re all AP Readers in this the mid second decade of the 21st Century right?

Hey! You hypo-youthful Readers!

Remember the rare treat of a film in stead of a regular class? What was not to like? The projector clickety-clacking and… and! the lights out In a classroom. (You could see the corridor all lit up, but inside, as dark as a movie theatre.)

Today, Readers we have a film (video). It shows a scott (with a couple of rogers). This is not a test. Just rely on your instincts. (ok, one hint: the two guys in brown not doing so much? Disregard them. Also, doesn’t matter what anyone is saying. This is a visual thing.)

Have fun.

 

* pronounced: scoe-shun

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Funny how some of the useful and fun insights afforded by the use of the Wakefield Doctrine as an additional perspective on the world around us may seem, at times, as totally serendipity.

Being a clark, we have no problem with making that statement. (After all, we’re not rogers) lol

And so, this is where the more advanced practice in the use of the Doctrine, is observed. It is not as simple as seeing a person give credit to another for something or other. It is how this giving credit manifests. And…and to make it even more intriguing, it, (the determination of another’s predominant worldview through a singular observation), comes down to ‘how it feels’. As the observer, not the actor.

And so, our point? The more involved we allow ourselfs to be, (in the perspective of the Wakefield Doctrine), the more we are capable of appreciating in the world around us. Like music and art, the more we know, the more we hear and see.

And, of course, a bit of luck never hurts.  A chance observation allowing a level of detail that otherwise might be overlooked.

One of our favorite insights into the personal reality of rogers is the ‘true cause’ of their ‘lashing out’.  (Beyond the scope of this post. Suffice to say, for clarks, knowing that lashing out is about them and not us makes reading a couple a thousand posts well worthwhile.)

…anyway. The true prompt for this post was a (chance) occurrence this weekend. It was while watching one of our favorite youtube channels. Nothing remarkable about the content, the ‘plot’ of that particular episodes. (It is, after all, a channel devoted to excavation, as in large, earth-moving equipment.)

That said, in the course of watching, we saw an example of one of the three predominant worldviews in a person. Feeling less than confident in our writing skills, the first thought was to simply link it and say, ‘Do you see that?!!?’

But then again, we realized that not all Readers are sufficiently fluent in the this thing of ours.

So, our take-away.

There was a person in this episode (not appearing in earlier posts). And it was not even what the person said or, (as we go at length in these posts), how he said it. It was about his physical presence, i.e. how he moved. The fun of this insight was how it prompted us to find synonyms for what we saw. a scott in motion.

the first thing that comes to mind is naturally, ‘quickness’ and ‘decisiveness’. It was one of those, once you see it, you can’t un-see it.

Everything, (about the person’s physical presence), was deliberate. And, no, not carefully considered or studied. Simply deliberate.

Alacrity was one of the first words. Unhesitatingly was the first adverb.

damn! that was a fun moment. to see the Wakefield Doctrine in motion.

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s weekly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. A ‘Grat’ Blog(hop), the theme is gratitude in general, the sharing (the) people, places and things that have caused us (other participants and yours truly) to experience the psycho-emotional state of gratitude, specifically. The TToT lists are, by tradition, ten (10) items in length and may be gathered (and garnered) from the author’s past, present and future (real and imagined). So, not much likelihood of a lack of material, ya know?

For the Wakefield Doctrine this week, we cite:

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Six Sentence Story bloghop

5) start of New Year, aka Holidays are over…relax!

6) speaking of Holidays. one (or two) more holidays and we can get back to simple Five-Days(in a row) Workweek! today is either Friday or Monday, right?

7) kind of a hypograt, but we’ve had very cold daytime temperatures ’round these parts of late… the good part is that the two snow events have been total powder snow… easy to shovel, don’cha know

8) something, something

9) Phyllis came up with a good line this week. The kind of bon mot that not only is funny (well, bring a smile in any event) but also quite appropriate. She say, “Since we’ve lived here, we’ve had three dogs ….and a Husky” bar rum bump.

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

music

aiyiiee! these musicians?!?!  what, are they from the secret Classical Musician Celebrity-Impersonator Guild or what?!! The cello player… seriously can’t decide on Robert Plant or Albert Lee.  Then among the violins Vince Gill (with silver hair, if he doesn’t already have it) and Tony Shalhoub and Taissa Famiga from the excellent movie, ‘The Final Girls

*

*

 

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘We resolve to eschew making reservations’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

So we were reading the Six Sentence Stories this week and, here on the Monday of a new year, was taken by Reena’s Six. While she writes most knowledgeably on matters of business and sundry issues like ethics at the intersection of Success and Survival in the business world, her Six this week resonated with a common theme here at the Doctrine.

The Past (good god! hunh! What is it good for? lol*)

While we are reminded by the Everything Rule that all three personality types manifest ‘The Past’ differently:

  • clarks (the Outsider) ayiieee! Quick! What is a thing that embodies a combination of self-destructive temptation with a promise of redemption through the willingness to admit mistakes while insisting on a single version of events? lol clarks keep their Past like a grease-stained, dog-eared, over-sized issue of an out-of-date Chilton’s Repair Manual (and…and! more often than not, skim the instructions with a speed to make Evelyn Wood throw her book across the room.)
  • scotts (the Predator) meh… the past? they don’t need no steeken past… but, if pressed (and the scott being questioned has a sufficiently strong secondary clarklike aspect) they might allow that their skills were born and honed in the past (aka Practice). In fact, we have it on good authority from a scott, namely, Glenn who, asked if he re-read or re-watched movies he enjoyed, said. ‘Why the fuck would I do that?’ Being creatures of the present, ‘Why the fuck indeed!’
  • rogers (the Herd Members) ha! totally cool historical reference (not exactly Joe Pesci/Nicky Santoro in ‘Casino’ but close): “The past is prologue.” We will leave the Reader to do their own look-up.

so that should get us in the mood for a New year (or should that be a new Year?)

New Readers: the Wakefield Doctrine is a tool, specifically an additional perspective on life. The three personality types are a reflection (of one’s) relationship to the world around them and the people who make it up. So read and study and…. practice. The goal of the principles of this thing of ours is to be better able to see the world as the other person is experiencing it.

 

*there goes our last chance at being mistaken for serious academia What the hell… Edwin! Edwins Starr! Please state our auxiliary thesis, if you please!

 

Share

Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- the Year 2525 in Review!

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Funny thing about time.

Consistent with the Everything Rule*, of course.

Time is experienced and therefore manifests differently for the three

  1. clarks have a excellent sense of time as it elapses, but totally at a loss for the passage of time. (Hint: the first is kinda between now and later, the latter? pretty much mostly ‘thens’)
  2. scotts scoff at the concept. what part of ‘here and now’ requires a stopwatch, wristwatch, Day Planner, calendar or any other mechanism for recording one’s life process. jeez what are sittin around for… let go!
  3. rogers …funny thing, they tend to be late for appointments involving personal interaction but totally prepared for every other type of ‘Well, now that we’re all here‘ or ‘Pick up your Number 2 pencils and begin the Test….Now!

So a Year in Review post for a clark? It’s the racing around the apartment when your date knocks on the door. You’re really looking forward to this, totally accept and are comfortable with your shortcomings and messy house but ya gotta hide the evidence of the things that matter and the things that don’t!

Thanks and a shoutout to the Hostinae and Host of the TToT1 and To the mutants what hang out at the Six Sentence Story, a simple ‘Hey, sup?’

* ‘Everyone does everything, at one time or another’. A Doctrine way of saying that a common world is shared, co-inhabited and otherwise occupied by all three predominant worldviews of the Wakefield Doctrine. There is no such thing as ‘Well, that’s something only a scott would do’ or ‘Sure, but no roger would ever react or respond like that’

the important concept (also the core tenet of the Doctrine) is that behavior and style, personality and expressions are a function of the relationship a person has with the world around them and the people who make it up. we refer to that as ‘how it (person, place, event, job, hobby etc) manifests in the world of:

  • the Outsider (clarks)
  • the Predator (scotts)
  • the Herd Member (roger)

what that means, specifically, well, thats where the study and reading and, most importantly, accepting and extrapolating the core premise for your-ownself

1) Mimi, Dyanne, Kristi, Lisa, Denise, Misky, KnitCat, cai and Andrew

Share