clarkscottroger | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 27 clarkscottroger | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 27

R-P-M -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘…this day in history*’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Secret theme and September(s) for a Monday?

fer sure

….Sept. 15th twelve years ago, here at the Doctrine (wavy lines special effects denoting a flashback)

Hey! this being one of the earliest of Doctrine posts to generate comments, we thought it would be fun to (try to) include them in the Reprint (hint….hint…. God-gave-you-a-keyboard-for-a-reason-people!) lol

*

Now, children! everyone find someone else and hold onto their hand

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine, class. If you pay attention, and listen closely, then at some time later in your life, much, much later, you will remember what you have learned here today. And when that time comes, you will say, (to your spouse, your friend, the police, your priest, the nurse or the man with the hearse)…”there was this place and there were these people and they told me about clarks, scotts and rogers and how it was so simple to understand other people if only I understood the Wakefield Doctrine! I see now that they were so very right…it is just sad that it is so very, very late for me…if only I had…written a Comment“!

Well, it’s not too late, binyons! You can participate, join in on the fun.  We are only a third of the way through the 90 Day Challenge, plenty of time to turn this bus around. Speaking of buses, lets make that the topic of today’s Post! (and the Wakefield Doctrine Lesson of the Day).

First Day of  School Trauma!

Alright! All-right! I’ll go first…

… oddly enough, I have no memory of 1st grade but I do remember that my 2nd grade Teacher’s name was Mrs. Brennan. Starting with the 2nd grade I attended a parochial school  and for the most part all the Teachers at Our Lady of Mercy (who doesn’t hear James Brown, “mer-cey!!”)School were nuns. Real nuns, not just sallyfield-looking-hey-just-a-normal-girl-who-happens-to-be-a-nun, no sir! These were Nuns of the Order of the Sisters of Mercy. En regalia, full-dress nuns. For those unfamiliar with the look, we’re talking about white on black habits, with face and hands as the only clue that there is a human there, never mind a female human. Damn! (The borg look like nudists compared to the Sisters of Mercy back in the early 60s.)
(Back to my First Day of School Trauma). Arriving in class, the very first thing I learned from a classmate was,  “if you don’t eat all your lunch, they make you eat in front of the whole school and for the first day of school they always serve something called Welsh Rabbit”. I spent the entire morning of the first day of school in the Second Grade in fear of what would happen when I refused to eat the Welsh Rabbit. We are talking “worry” on a level such that I was so focused on trying to come up with a plan to avoid the lunchroom embarrassment, that I almost got sent back to the First Grade. I could not have spelled my own name when called on, cause I was busy! I had to think of something!  Sitting in one of those desks with the fliptop writing surface and the seat attached and the whole thing held together by a wrought-iron frame. Somehow I survived. I look back now, from the vantage point of the Wakefield Doctrine, can there be any doubt that there was a clark sitting in that totally uncomfortable seat in September, trying to figure his way out of spot that (he) was barely equipped to deal with.

( …Pero Principal Clarke, lo que Wakefield Lección Doctrina del Día vamos a tener de su historia muy interesante?… )

Why thank you, Miguel,  for that reminder. The Lesson of the Day is more an illustration of the clarklike personality. The reaction of the 8-year-old clark in this story is that his response to a threat was to try and think of a plan to avoid the embarrassment that he perceived to be waiting for him at lunch (he really, really hated cheese). The saying at the Doctrine is: clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel.

Alright DownSprings! Next?

Comments

  1. Downspring#1 says:

    FEAR. clarks spend their entire lives living with fear – trying to overcome it, face it, run away from it but damn, can never quite shake it. Fear has amazing power(s), not only in a present sense but in a future sense also. I wrote a Comment at this blog some time back about clarks being the ultimate “planners”. When faced with a challenge, in this case, how to avoid eating a Welsh “Rabbit”, the clark very often will go into “planning” mode.
    A plan that is predicated on events that have not yet happened. Unless clarks are imbued with divine powers, they/we cannot know the future. (except that knowledge of the Wakefield Doctrine, (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) can in fact help one to predict what oneself and those around them may do in any given scenario)
    As clarks spend time in a future that does not yet exist, they miss out on the very present that will affect said future. Had the young Progenitor clark said to himself “lunch isn’t for 3 hours yet, who cares what they’re having” he would have avoided the self-imposed embarrassment that came when he was called on in class while he was doing his “planning”. One might say, ‘had the young clark been more scottian (who cares)or rogerian (everyone will be having Welsh Rabbit) all would have been avoided’.
    Interesting that this was noticed by our young clark at such an early age. The “formative” years are so very, very crucial. The question oft asked at this blog is how/when does one eventually become predominantly a clark, scott or roger? What are the events that precede this “becoming”?
    How was I to know that in first grade, while acting strictly in the here and now (scottian) and talking, talking, talking to my classmates (rogerian ) when I was not supposed to that, that was my defining “clark” moment? Maybe it was.
    (In my ‘First Day of School Trauma’ contribution) I will simply say that for talking when I was not supposed, my punishment was to stand in front of the entire first grade class opening and closing my mouth (as if talking) until I was told to stop. I was absolutely mortified. I was embarrassed in front of my peers and mostly certainly would have been laughed at by them if it were not for the utter fear elicited by …..Sister Mary Cedric.

  2. AKH says:

    WOW!!! Talk about flash backs! It’s weird, but I too can’t remember anything about early school (kindergarten and first grade). Not a single memory. When my family moved from Illinois to New Jersey I attended Holy Cross. I was in 2nd grade and remember that clearly. Loved egg salad sandwiches. Remember we had to put our lunches in the back closet instead of a refrigerator where they would ferment all morning? And then those little cartons of milk that were always warm? Well, I loved egg salad sandwiches and would bring them to school for lunch all of the time. And all of the kids used to move their desks away from me. Fuck ‘em I thought to myself while I enjoyed my lunch. Looking back I’d have to say that was the first glimpse of my scottian nature as opposed to the previously mentioned Blood, Sweat and Tears stuff.
    Yeah, those nuns were something else. I remember a really mean one called Sister Chairatina (sp?). We used to call her Sister Cherry Bomb. She was one mean, retched nun. There was this kid in my class (Jimmy Reynolds) who never paid attention and was always disrupting the class. Looking back I think he had ADHD. Anyway, Sister Cherry Bomb used to take him out of class and bang his head against the wall. The concrete wall. No lie.
    One morning when the school bus pulled into the school parking lot Sister Chairatina was out there and we started chanting “…run her over, run her over….” Needless to say, the bus driver wasn’t too thrilled about that.
    And then there was the time that my brother was caught with gum in his mouth. The nun made him put it in his hair for the rest of the day.
    Man, those nuns got away with murder.
    And of course there were the nun jokes. “What’s black and white and re(a)d all over? A bloody nun.” Shit I still remember the damn secret school song about tossing a nun down the stairs. I’ll spare you the lyrics.
    But I digress. When I read the post all of those memories came flooding back. And now I am absolutely irrevocably certain that the scott in me came to life.
    Thankfully in 6th grade I started attending public school. I was finally free from the wrath of those ungodly nuns. And I didn’t have to wear a uniform (I bet all you rogers loved wearing uniforms). How liberating that was!
    OK, class dismissed.

  3. RCoyne RCoyne says:

    We public school kids weren’t allowed uniforms. We were dragged in on Wednesdays after school and on Sunday after Mass for catechism, when they would try to convert the godless heathen Irish kids, or at least hope that we could be taught to stand upright. Many, many knuckles were bloodied by a nun wielding a three-sided ruler. The offense? Daring to touch something in the parochial kid’s desk that you were sitting at. I once studied the wrong catechism lesson, and was made to not just stand outside the classroom, but out of the school altogether in the parking lot. My mom was extremely pissed, but couldn’t even vaguely intimidate the nuns. I thought that was pretty amazing because she tore up the public school teachers on a regular basis. And we always thought that they liked you guys. Amazing how you can carry that stuff around for decades, eh?

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      yeah, those of us on the inside (the ones with the frickin school-clothes that you public school kids never had to wear) like the fact that you poor kids had to do the Wednesday afternoon cathecism thing, we alsways got out early that day.
      Not just that we felt bad for any kids who had to go back into a school building, after the school day endedbut we also were told that it was all for show anyway…you know…”Class, the public school children will be coming in today, be sure not to tell them that they are all going to burn in hell when they die, anyway. Lets just keep that to our selves”.

  4. clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

    Hey, AKH! I have a scottian associate at work who read these Comments…her contribution: that as punishment for not behavin like a good catholic school girl should, the nuns would make her be the one who had to clean up when someone puked! (Which considering the time and setting that we are discussing) was a fairly regular job. She does remember the green saw dust shit that was always the clean-up material of choice. (Long corridors of shiny green and black tile offset by short trails of sawdust, all headed in vain towards the bathrooms…)

  5. Downspring#1 says:

    Even though I am running late this morning, took a quick turn here and can’t resist my own “nun story”.
    4th grade penmanship class. That’s correct. In the old days students weret taught the proper way to write. They called it “cursive”. (kids have it easy now – look at the picture and push the screen icon. can you spell “hamburger, no pickles”?)
    (At this moment, Sister “C” is sitting in a rocker reminiscing over the last 175 years. Wait a minute! No, she isn’t, because back when I was in 4th grade she was already 125!)
    Anyway, quiet spring day learning cursive. What’s that noise? Seems Donald B keeps whispering to his buddy. While the class looks on, Sister C quietly walks over to Donald B’s desk (while his back is turned, mind you) and waits for him to turn around and notice her. Once he does, we all hear a few semi-loud recriminating words and then watch in utter horror (and amazement) while this 125 year old, 100lb nun (wearing glasses) takes one hand and completely upturns Donald B’s desk.
    Whoo-wee! It was loud, it was scary…. it was parochial.
    A clark on steroids? A scott in a bad mood? A roger with not enough attention paid to her?

 

*sorta

Share

Repro-Moday -the Wakefield Doctrine- Hash(#)tag this

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

What would you like to know today?

How to apply the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine to your day today so as to have an even better day?

What is the single most important fact about the Wakefield Doctrine?

The reason for this ‘personality theory’ to even exist, much less be promulgated, proselytized, advocated and otherwise pushed on an unsuspecting internet readership comprised of those looking to be entertained and/or distracted from a life clearly lacking?

Those?

Or maybe,

Why have 2,607 posts been posted, many of which, such as this one, have been unabashedly held up as a repeat of the same insight?

Surely some Readers are thinking, ‘What will you use for a musical accent to this …’post’?”

Many are, with an eye towards the time thinking, ‘Are you done now? Can I safely compose and add a thoughtful comment?’

 

Sure*

 

* nope, nothing here. unless you’re suspecting a decoder ring message**…

#the Doctrine is for you; not them #reality is, to a small but quite real degree, personal; #there are three characteristic modes of relating to the world, as an Outsider, a Predator and a Herd Member; #everyone does everything, at one time or another; the Power is found in accepting and appreciating how we relate ourselves to the world around us and the people who make it up

** Decoder Rings! Surely the apps of the 1950s and early 1960s. Probably should figure out how to construct one.

 

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s eight thousand ninety-third post in Lizzi’s Ten Things of Thankful(TToT) bloghop. If you’re new to the blogosphere, a ‘bloghop’ is a type of participatory writing…thingie. Surprising or not, our friend-who-knows-stuff-and-doesn’t-mind-passing-notes-when-Sister-Catherine-is-distracted, Wikipedia, doesn’t provide a particularly simple definition. All we have are ‘bloggers’ (‘bloggers motto: “Hey! Everyone with a computer only bought the device because the sales person promised it would allow them to read the semi-random thoughts of people, including, especially including, those who feel the editorial ‘we’ is so clearly a humble voice to use when ranting about reality, music videos and stream-of-couscous, knew they had to read every day!‘) posting their own definitions (probably at three-in-the-morning on September ‘Gotta Come up with Someteenth’.

But enough about them chefs and cooks and their assistants on the far-side of the swinging doors. For our entré

1) Una

2) Phyllis

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Six Sentence Story bloghop (there!! see! what we talked about in the intro? there’s one of them rascals right here.)

5) serial story writing, the Whitechapel Interlude and the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf

6) the internet, in general, (for a clark it’s like the biggest used book/new magazine store possible) and the blogosphere, in particular, (it’s like the perfect Halloween Evening)

7) Vicari-Grat*: Phyllis’ and her penchant for doing fun things, despite how (or because of) how many of us have thought to slow down. (photo from one of her most recent moonrise swims at Narragansett Town Beach)

8)something, something

9) Field of Weeds. (Don’t mow it and they will grow….)

10) Secret Rule 1.3 which states, in part, [“…just getting to, like, Grat Number Seven, ya gotta be grateful for that…. but save it for Number 10”] op. cit. ibid and e pluribus unum

 

* vicarious gratitude…. “We’re glad you shared your fun with others..”

music vid

*

*

*

*

Now, it’s no secret we’re fans of Queen. We listen often (and post here, on the weekend, not infrequently). Thing of it is, while we knew the title of this song, we can’t say we know the song. Kinda fun tuneage.

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Montewsday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Alert Reader writes: “I read your blog. Well, a lot of it. There were some posts clearly on the indulgent side. OK, but I did read: clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel. I also read the part that said (countless times, in barely different contexts):

‘We are all born with the capacity to experience the world from three distinct perspectives: that of the Outsider(clarks), the Predator(scotts) and the Herd Member(rogers) but we all settle into one and only one of these three and develop our social strategies from there, but never lose the potential to experience the world as do the other two.’

And, I would swear I read that ‘If the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine are understood and properly applied, I will be in a position to know more about the other person than they know about themselves.’ Well, not to indulge in citing semi-obscure lines from popular movies, but, ‘that’s a bold statement!’

We thank the Reader for trying to jumpstart our Post, this post-holiday Tuesday.

But the Doctrine does put a person in a position to know more about the other person than they know about themselves, provided the person in question is not, themselves already in possession of an understanding of the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine.

Here’s a quick insight:

Anyone who comes back to this blog more than twice, in response to a small voice that whispers, ‘Wait a darn minute! Did they really say that?’ is either a predominant clark or a scott (or a) roger with a strong secondary clarklike aspect.

It’s true!

(Granted, that was being kinda cruel. To the scotts and the rogers. Secondary aspects are a little tricky to perceive and the predominant aspect is, in fact, the reality in which the person exists, i.e. the real reality. For a predominant clark, it’s easy peasy. The fact of the matter is, to a clark, even on first visit, there is a sense of …familiarity. It’s not the structural or even organizational elements that they respond to, it’s the goal; the goal all clarks are possessed by is to make sense of the world around them.

The cool thing about clarks who come here? Nine times out of eight, once they get the ‘it’s the nature/character/quality of the relationship of the individual to the world around them that makes everything hold together’ part, they can, (and usually do), extrapolate an awful lot of the rest. That’s why, if you read this blog long enough, you will see Readers who show up, then begin to make observations that imply they’ve read all Twenty-six hunnert posts. And you know, given the fun they seem to be having, that they surely didn’t slog through all dem posts.

lol

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine, y’all!

 

(here, as implied elsewhere, the music vid to support a needlessly obscure joke reference)

*

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

We did mention that the Wakefield Doctrine is a tool for self-improving oneself, did we not?

Sure we did.

At the risk of leaving ourselfs open to the totally wonderful, (wish we’d thought of it), observation, “If the only tool you have is a hammer, it is tempting to treat everything as if it were a nail.” (Maslow sorta) we will remind New Readers: the Wakefield Doctrine is an additional perspective on the world around us and the people who make it up.

Enough with the ‘…for now, refer to the syllabus you were given at the start of the class’.

The word ‘perspective’ is also a clue to the (intended) use of the principles of the Doctrine for change and development. The Wakefield Doctrine is predicated on the notion that …

oh dip!* I’ve missed the early morning train to Insightsville! damn**

Be sure to check back tomorrow, we promise to offer useful information and practical applications of this most wonderful of personality ‘theories’.

Note: New Readers? If your first thought is:

“What the hell! I paid tuition. Well, I paid with my time, clicking here… ya know?!!? Though I gotta say the preliminaries are, no offense, pretty obvious. In fact, based on the most fundamental descriptions of the three personality types and the role of how a person relates themselves to the world around them (yeah, pretty clever, inserting that ‘themselves’ in to the more common, ‘how we relate to the world’ adds an entirely personal dimension to the equation) and a couple of other things like ‘personal reality’ and that initially way-weird ‘Everything Rule’ (in the last installment we actually heard Cameron (a total clark) on the wonderful internet video series BlackTail Studio state the Everything Rule, nearly word-for-word). I’ll just go ahead and do some self-study.”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine. You got this.

 

the Wakefield Doctrine: ‘you’re already practicing the core Principles, you might as well get something for all your efforts’ (…yeah, even some fun!)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

The reason we say,  you’re already practicing the Principles is that, as a personality theory, the Wakefield Doctrine does not start with a person answering questions, filling out a survey or questionnaire, reporting likes and dislikes, lying about weaknesses and strengths, exaggerating the things others like and hate about us. No. In a funny, you-guys-really-are-weird kind of way the Wakefield Doctrine doesn’t really care what the individual thinks their personality (type) should or could or might be. Nope. This here personality theory here does not need to know that.
…as a matter of fact! You don’t even need to involve the person that you are about to know (better, in a way) than they know themselves. You see, the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not for them.

But I’m getting ahead of us. We’ll come back to this ‘you mean I can know my boyfriend’s, my Teacher’s, my wife’s, my boss’s, my kid’s personality types and I don’t need to ask them to help?’ in just about a paragraph. First, the Principles that the Title of today’s Post says you are already practicing.

The Wakefield Doctrine is all about how a person relates themselves to the world around them. Notice the odd wording, I did not say, ‘how a person relates to the world‘. Because that’s only one dimension, in a sense a description of  what happens as the person goes about their life. We say, ‘how the person relates themselves to the world around them’ because it is not simply a choice (about how to act, what to do, how to feel about it), it is reality. What we refer to as a worldview.
In the context of the Wakefield Doctrine, we all live in a personal reality, aka our worldview. This means that my reality is different from yours. No, nothing weird… no screaming vegetables, nothing shooting across the sky, no flying without the help of technology, but different nonetheless. And it is the way our worldviews differ that we find the value and utility in our personality theory.

The Wakefield Doctrine maintains that we are all born with the potential to experience the world from one of three ‘perspectives’, living in one of three worldviews, if you will. And what most people call ‘personality types’, we know as the appropriate behavior, given the world that a person finds themselves experiencing. (Remember!  personal reality as in ‘real’ and ‘reality’  not  “just ’cause you felt like it, or I think I will choose to act like this, she deserves it….”) The three characteristic worldviews are:

  1. the reality of the Outsider (clarks)  not ‘because’, not ‘well, you should speak up more’, and definitely not ‘well if you didn’t act so weird, people would get to know you and  you would have an easier time in life’  this reality is simply one in which you are here and ‘the world’ is out there. (For our clarklike Readers this last statement is sufficient, the rogers and the scotts might nod and look understanding, but will never get it)
  2. the world of the Predator (scotts) of the three personality types, scotts can be the easiet to deal with- they are energetic and active, enthusiastic and mercurial helpful and very dangerous… the saying here is: clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel’.  scotts are the life of the party and the reason the police get called, scotts are your best friend until someone who they look up to shows up and then your life will be miserable , scotts are the neighbor who will lend you anything in his garage and help build your deck without asking and she is the neighbor with the well-behaved kids (at least they are when she is around, when she is not….ayiieee!), scottsare fun and tiring, loyal and seductive  you have at least one scottian friend
  3. the world as seen by a member of the Herd (rogers) are the reason we have civilization and they are the reason we have repressive societies. they are the personality type that lives in a world of emotion… not just moods and feelings, but where clarks think things and scotts act out, rogers manipulate emotion, in themselves and in the people around them. Ever encounter someone who makes you feel comfortable talking?  ...roger  know anyone at work who is always in the center of things and knows all about everyone?… roger ever find your husband/wife…boyfriend/girlfriend  acting like they had no idea that you had a life outside the relationship?  lol roger  there is a saying around here: without rogers humanity would still be out on the savannah with the scotts roaming in packs, feeding on the giant herds of rogers while the clarks dart among the low underbrush in a desperate attempt to stay alive long enough to invent opposable thumbs

These three worldviews are the ‘core principles’ of the Doctrine that you are already practicing.

Back to the Practical Value….and how you don’t need to involve the ‘other person’ and how this Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not for them.

Today. Observe the people in your life. Infer which of the three worldviews they appear to be acting from, test this against the descriptions of each of the three personality types that you will find throughout this blog. Once you know which the other person is, you will know why they are doing the things that they are and because you know this, you will have the choice of how you would respond, how you feel about what they do, how to shape the message if you need to get them to do what you want. In other words, you will have more freedom of choice than they do.

 

* one of the best ‘tv shows’ available on the internets, ‘Good Place’ we totally recommend it.

** yeah, here… all too often

#wakefielddoctrine, #theoryofclarks,scotts,and,rogers

Share