clarkscottroger | the Wakefield Doctrine

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

In addition to being immune to any undue influence in regard to both gender and culture, the Wakefield Doctrine is age neutral.

What does that mean/What the fuck/What is it you think you’re saying?

…said three Readers, each with a different predominant worldview.

ed. the photo at the top? Ola as a puppy.

ok!!

That certainly was intriguing, insightful and just a touch incomplete! What say we wrap things up with three provocative statements about the personality types of the Wakefield Doctrine

For the three, as time inexorably advances, the essential character, fading, but never disappearing:

  • clarks (the Outsiders) are born old. If lucky, they lose the shackles and bindings of reasonable judgement and accommodation
  • scotts (the Predators) never grow old. The measure of tenure, with it’s implied skill of enduring, very much luck and a strong secondary aspect
  • rogers (the Herd Members) are born to a perfect world. If spared too great a drive to become perfecter, survive in a tradition

there ya go!

forgive our caveman’s club of musical selection… like the song. Chose the live version because Neil, for a roger, did not age consistent with the grace he possessed before he got old.

 

 

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Fine! We’ll start with something that is not quite un-original:

From the perspective of the three predominant worldviews of the Wakefield Doctrine;

‘hope springs eternal’ (rogers)

‘ambition never dies’ (clarks)

‘hunger is life’ (scotts)

There you go! An insight into Life that, while anything but conventional, affords one a refreshing sense of the wonder of human reality.

ok, oh-kay!

One more ProTip:

the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them.

*

Share

Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

…so a clark, a scott and roger walk into a popular restaurant a little before 11:45 one Wednesday afternoon

(thanks to Misky for today’s post thesis (ish))

Damn, we’ve been writing this blog for so long now that the above phrase might qualify as a trope. At least for those tens of Readers who have visited this blog over the last thirty-five hundred posts.

In fact, given the lateness of this writing, we will search for a RePrint that addresses this manifestation of the three predominant worldviews and their distinctly different experience in a common situation.

…hold on

ok… well, kinda

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “… of development, writers clubs and understanding the world around us.”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Do we outgrow the past or do we simply forget? Do the improvements, growth and developments we achieve (through effort, ambition and circumstance) become like, well, the way it is.

We admit to a fondness for the occasional peculiar word or phrases that, although uncommon in everyday conversation, are fun. Today (in light of the opening sentences) the fun word/phrase/expression is raison dêtre. (which our friends at wikipedia define as  “…a French expression commonly used in English, meaning “reason for being” or “reason to be”.”)

The Wakefield Doctrine is the reason for the existence of this blog. All, and only, because it hit me one night that it would be good to ‘formalize’ my personal system for explaining the world and the people in it.

The Wakefield Doctrine holds that we are, all of us, born with the potential to experience the world as one of three characteristic realities. At an early age we ‘pick’ one of these three ‘worldviews’ and we are on our way to becoming clarks, scotts or rogers. The Wakefield Doctrine, as a personality ‘theory’, is not concerned with how you would describe yourself, the results of questionnaires created to identify traits and interests or even what you think that girl is doing sitting out there in the middle of the field looking back towards the house filled with people she may or may not be related to (well, sometimes we enjoy the traditional approaches; I mean, damn! give yourself away in one description much, clark? lol). Unlike other tools developed by psychology, sociology and phrenology, tools easily transposed to popular media such as ‘the Face Book’ where they lie, attractively packaged, club-shaped mirrors waiting for someone to notice, “Oh, honey! Come here! I found this personality test in my magazine and it so has you down to a T! Lets take it together. You first.”

Central to the hypothesis of the Wakefield Doctrine is the notion that we all live in a reality that is, to a certain degree, personal. Nothing weird, mystical or magical. Simply that if you and I are standing in front of the entrance to, say, a very popular restaurant, our experience of that moment will not be identical. The Doctrine takes this and jumps up above the individual and says, ‘Suppose the world was one in which individuals are separated from each other in a way not easily discernible or, better still, imagine that the life we wake up into after each sleep is that of the Predator, simple and direct, eat or be eaten; or suppose everything in the world is knowable and, to a degree established in a way that allows for complete agreement among like-minded people, that the universe is, in fact, definable and quantifiable.’

This is key to understanding the Doctrine. Children (you, me and the girl behind the counter asking if that’ll be Regular or Premium) all grow and develop (their) personalities in order to successfully interact with the environment that surrounds them. Social, physical, the whole thing. And this is done in the context of the nature and character of the world, as they experience it. These strategies evolve and develop into the style we refer to as our ‘personality type’.

I grew up in the world of the Outsider (clark). I developed a way of relating to the people and the world around me that permits me to stay out of the limelight (can’t have people pointing at me and telling everyone that we don’t belong) while at the same time giving me the tools and the drive to search for whatever it was that I didn’t learn when I was too young to realize it i.e. how to be a real person.

A friend of mine grew up in the reality of the Predator (scott). She’s a lot of fun to be around, gets more done in a morning than most people do in a week. She is always on alert, never is not paying attention to whats going on around her and everyone likes her…except for the ones who are terrified of her. Temperament is often un-fairly pronounced with the accent entirely on the first syllable… we prefer the word: mercurial. You want something done right away, you ask her and step out-of-the-way.

If you want that thing done right… you find my friend who grew up in the life of the Herd Member (roger). He will know how to do it so that the joints line up, the glue doesn’t stick out at the ends and it stays the way it’s supposed to be… forever. He knows the simple fact of the life that there’s a Right Way.  No, nothing as an alternative, no second-runner-up. One way. Fortunately, my friend has so many other people around him that grew up knowing that they all belong. Sure there’s minor disagreements over decor, but it’s all one big hap…. Herd. The world is good. Just have to understand.

*

Share

Teisdat -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Thank god for Friends of the Doctrine!

In yesterday’s Post we mentioned Cynthia, (a leading Doctrine scholar), and one of her comments had Post Theme written all over it’s own bad self.

to wit:

Hmm. You taking up piano, Clark? Is that a clark-like instrument, because I am re-learning to play. Haha. I remember Roger saying he plays the guitar. Is that a more rogerian instrument? And something LOUD would be perfect for the Scotts. My brother in law is learning the fiddle. If he were younger, I’d bet my money on drums or…trombones

New Readers! It is entirely acceptable to me asking yourself… ‘What does she mean?’

Well, be patient! She is talking about the Wakefield Doctrine and, as you should know by now, is: an additional perspective on the world around us and the people who make it up. And…and! rather than a bunch of silly letters (Oscar Myers, we’re looking at you) or semi-embarrassing made up stuff (Latency Period, really Sigmund? you’re gonna go with the hand-the-adolescent-boys-a-freebie?), we have the very simple standard: How does the person relate themselves to the world? There are three personality types in the Wakefield Doctrine:

  • clarks (the Outsider)
  • scotts (the Predator)
  • rogers (the Herd Member)

fine.

Our correspondent Cynthia’s Comment is raising the issue of which musical instrument is most in simpatico with which personality type?1

…damn! out of time! tune in tomorrow for the conclusion of out lecture: ‘Music Performance and What the Heck is She Doing?!?!’

*interesting footnote: the story is (from a video of Joe Walsh talking about starting out) that one of his first instruments was ….the trombone!  Hey! Good illustration of a scott. Now the host of the show, Daryl Hall? (we’re thinking clark, possible roger)

 1  of course, she does not mean that only one type is attracted to or otherwise drawn to one particular instrument. The Everything Rule allows that ‘everyone does everything. at one time or another‘. And so, while guitar, (in particular lead guitar), is a very effective choice in manifesting how a scott relates themselfs to the world, clarks can be effective with it as well, e.g. Jeff Beck. The key value of the Everything Rule is to remind us consider what an individual, in their handling of an instrument, tell us about how they relate to the world.

Share

Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

The Doctrine, at least for the purposes of this post, can be likened to a musical instrument. It has the inherent value to produce what most of us characterize as a musical sound/tone. It responds to a certain approach/technique better than others. There are, (to some), arbitrary rules for the application of it in the service of playing music, (i.e. you should not use a clarinet as a bow on a viola, you should not blow into the f-holes of a double bass expecting to hear an alto note) and, finally, with study and practice, one might arrive at the point of being able to produce something otherwise not available any other way.

So learn your scales, (the characteristics of the three predominant worldviews), and practice until you know each note/detail by heart.

Practice your lessons: “a clark and a scott and a roger stand on the sidewalk across the street from a very popular restaurant.”

Play the clarklike part… now the scottian observation and finally, the roger’s counter response and, likely extended, coda.

Repeat.

Eventually, with practice, and, it is assumed, a certain of talent, one can play this little piece with emphasis on each of the three as the lead melody. And, if one has or develops ‘an ear’, you might bring each part to life in manner the listener has not heard before.

Technical prowess will produce a truly effective performance.

However, once you have the technique mastered, you can begin to put yourself into the music. And by doing so, produce something (insights into the life of total stranger) not heard before.

you know, like that.

 

Share