Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

AP Level Wakefield Doctrine today!

oh boy!

ok, before we begin: honor system here today. do not read the RePrint post below. at least not right yet.

Full Disclosure: as the Curator, we will also not read the RePrint below. (Sure, we scanned it sufficiently to decided to copy it. But we didn’t read it-read it. As to why? None of your business. And, yeah, of course, ‘we’ wrote it in the first place. But we’ve been going through an introspective-self-questioning period of late. Mostly, centered on: ‘damn that past iteration Curator wrote posts that were pretty engaging. why can’t we do that?’

the Answer? doesn’t fricken matter. We write posts because that was the way, and good-thing-too-it-was-undisclosed price of the totally serendipitous insight that lead to the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers (aka the Wakefield Doctrine).

The serendipitous insight? To reframe a joke from certain friends: “Wanna hide something from New Readers in a blog? Put it in the ‘About Page’. lol. Here, save ya the click.

…ok, got the self-doubt outa our system (for today).

The ‘AP Level’ Doctrine principle? The personal reality that is the linchpin to the Wakefield Doctrine and the three predominant worldviews is real. At least it’s as real as a Reader might be capable of, i.e. scott come back!!! roger no, don’t try that ‘I can really appreciate what you’re trying to convey.’ don’t even try. clark… lol

While the central tenet remains that the basis for the three personality types is the character of the relationship a person maintains with the world around them and the people who make it up, a closer look at personal reality is worth-our-while.

Our RePrint strives to say that, when, say, a clark becomes aware of the world around them the people (who make it up) are different. Most of them do share a knowledge, an appreciation of a common bond. A (young clark) is not projecting, she/he is discerning the difference. And, for reasons not fully understood, the clark immediately covers-up their insight. An additional behavior is then overlayed on the normal, young human learning to navigate the world, develop social strategies…aka  develop their personality. That is: avoid excessive scrutiny.

(and for a scott and a roger, the same. they do not take it into their heads to pretend the world is full of predator and prey nor do they decide that all is quantifiable and knowable and they must maintain to the best of their capability to maintain a role in the center of the group.)

dig?

 

ok… not gonna clutter this post with a full RePrint. If you need something to read Here is RePrint for today.

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Frank Hubeny says:

    I like how the original Scott solved the problem in the About page without bothering to tell the customer (a roger?) what was wrong but merely disabled some of the original functioning of the cassette recorder without explaining the consequences of his actions. I think the roger would have been delighted to give a full lecture on what went wrong (perhaps as I’m doing now), but would have preferred not to listen to it. I wonder what the clark would have done.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      good get.
      the clark would take a similar path as the roger (convey information) put for a different reason (and more information needed by anyone) but would be concerned that the customer didn’t think he (the clark) was being superior (find away to convey ‘Not your fault, we all would have done that’)

      Paul of Tarsus ain’t got nothin’ on your Humble Narrator

      …lol

  2. How many times have I said an iteration of, “Of course, we all do this, or make this mistake, or whatever.”

Leave a Reply