Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
It’s Complicated
You wouldn’t understand
You’re different, this doesn’t apply
Life is not so neat and organized
Sure, it’s clever but to be genuinely useful it’s fairly under-validated
Derivative, been done
People simply don’t fit into so limited a taxonomic scheme
Everyone will laugh
Life doesn’t fit into three categories
What were they again? (clarks, scotts and rogers)
And the basis of this paper-doll phylogeny? (one’s relationship with the world)
Stop it, now.
There’s no way you’re going to backwards-answer the above statements and bring it to a conclusion. (no, not if you maintain that attitude)
An additional perspective on the world around us and the people who make it up. The Wakefield Doctrine is not the Answer. It is a question. As such, you are responsible for the product of its application to your life.
One thing: a) you can’t get it wrong 2) you can’t break it.
It’s not for everyone. Not everyone enjoys the constructive make-believe that is hidden (all too effectively for most) in the world.
*



It is complicated, and yet simple. Amazing how that works.
ikr?