TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

hey, random memory* of product as fun to see as eat *yeah, that should be more disturbing than it is

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s weekly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. This is (imo only) an very healthy exercise in both perception and perspective. It is well known, (to the point of axiomata*), that the emotional tenor of our relationship with the world around us (and the people who make it) can make the world in terms of health and well-being.

1)  Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) is it us or do these two pine trees look even greener than green? (Full Disclosure: ok, not the screaming green, in this photo that I choose to believe I saw in person

5) comments from Friends of the Doctrine including Mimi and Misky These comments, opinion, insight and suggestions all serve to help us stay relevant when we write our Doctrine posts (pretty much every Monday-Wednesday). Yeah, better don’t go looking for how long ago the word ‘relevant’ was in circulation. lol

6) helpful reminders from Hostinae cai as we approach the last of the current batch of links (to the scheduled TToTs) she was thoughtful enough to sent us an email

7) the Six Sentence Story bloghop

8) something, something

9) work on the pond (no ‘before’ only after photos; your curator is, after all, a clark) Fortunately we have a significant secondary scottian aspect which meant bringing along our chainsaw to climb on the branches of the storm-fallen tree to remove the threat to the pond, i.e. blocking the channel to allows the pond to fill when the adjacent river is at the right level.

10) Secret Rule 1.3

* not a ‘real’ word

music vid

*

*

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Leave a Reply