Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

If you don’t mind, having missed a normal (well, as normal as anything is, here at the Wakefield Doctrine) we’d like to do something a little different (“differently’?)

Hey! Ever wonder is there was anything clarks abhor more than scrutiny?*

To be defined by another/others in such as way as to persist and constrain (the) clark in their efforts to get through Life.

Well, that helped (us! lol) to get the cob-webs out from a missed day of writing a post.

Promise (ette) to get back to the plan to describe how without fatal contradiction, the Everything Rule can alter certain skills and attributes in an individual person. To result in, something like a precise scott (or a private roger or…or! a gregarious clark  lol).

Stay tuned

* of course the other two have something they fear, or if we were to take liberty with words (like that’d ever happen) the thing that is anathema to each of the three predominant worldviews:

• clarks (the Outsiders) scrutiny, i.e. the uninvited/uncontrollable inquisition by (an) other or others
• scotts (the Predators) unreliability,  we were talking a scott a long time ago about what it is like to be a clark. By way of describing our capacity for adapting. we said, “clarks have a near infinite capacity to deal with the novel. If a clark wakes up in the morning and it turns out the sky is purple (with green polka dots) they’d take a moment and go about their day like it was supposed to be that way.” the scott we were talking to replied, “No, impossible. Unacceptable! To having nothing of the world that is reliable, in a knowable way. a scott could not tolerate that.”
• rogers (the Herd Members) this one is simple: to be shunned, to be exiled from the Herd.