Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
The simplest, and among those who have come to this website more than two and a half times, question we hear is this:
What good is it?
There are, in the way of this particular theory of personality, three answers:
- It offers a fragment of a map
- It’s kinda fun and, hey… anything that provides an edge is good
- It might, in certain circumstance, once properly vetted and refined, offer more richness to an already perfect world
There! Ha! Our topic!
New Readers: What follows is an example of: Experience versus Youth. Unbridled Enthusiasm versus Thoughtful Reflection. If you’re new, we recommend the 2010-2013 vintage posts.
Anyway. Lost the thread…. oh yeah, this (from this weekend’s call-in)
clarks are crazy * scotts are stupid * rogers are dumb
the worst other personality type for:
- a clark is to be a roger
- for a scott is to be a clark
- for a roger is to be a scott
Why?
Do your reading.
Given how their joining in on the call-in this weekend spares us the need to find and post a RePrint, a Doctrine shout-out:
- Cynthia for all website and internetistic needs and requirements head over to her site: Artfunky
- Denise for reading and finding a path to the true value of the blogosphere, i.e. bloghops and flash fiction and such: GirlieontheEdge
- roger for words and posts that are composed of pleasingly well-rounded words: The Secessionist Rag
So go to these sites and be sure to tell ’em the Doctrine sent ya,
About clarkscottroger
Thank you, Clark for the shoutout.
Yes, it was enjoyable in the usual roundabout way we wind up talking about clarks, scotts and rogers.
tru dat