Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
When last we met in Tuesday-as-memoir mode, we alluded to the power of the rogerian worldview in matters relating to popularity. Specifically writing and books and such.
Simply put, rogerian writers are more successful than clarklike or scottian authors.
(Wait for it…)
Success being defined as attracting the maximum number of Readers, viewers, attendees and followers. Quantity, not (necessarily) quality.
This is surely a perfect time to bring out a fundamental element of the Wakefield Doctrine. Frankly, if you’re a new Reader, will need this concept1* to best understand our little personality theory.
First things first. As to the core concept that eliminates much confusion:
The Everything Rule: ‘Everyone does everything at one time or another’.
In the context of the Wakefield Doctrine, this rule allows the entirely un-necessary, nay, the self-destructive balkanization of a novel and productive perspective on human nature. The Everything Rule reminds us that there is nothing in one of the three predominant worldviews that is exclusive relative to the other two.
Example: People, new to the Wakefield Doctrine, often will ask, “No matter how many times I ask him not to, my husband leaves the toilet seat up. Is that a scottian thing?”
No. It is not. Leaving the toilet seat up is not exclusive to those who relate to the world as does the Predator (scotts). But close!** How this peculiar ‘contrariness’ manifests in clarks and rogers is different, but definitely present. The key concept: how a behavior, predilection, tropism..whatever manifests in (an) individual is the product of their relationship to the world around them and the people who make it up.
Much more on the Everything Rule in future Tuesdays.
Lets end with one core concept and one old saying.
*The Wakefield Doctrine is gender, age and culture neutral.*
clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel.
Holy smoke!2
- ok, here is where the fun of this series surely will be found. What we say and what we do and etc. et.al. is the product of our predominant worldview. easy concept, yes? so, in this little aside we see a primary characteristic of the clarklike predominant worldview and …and! we gain an insight into one who relates themselves to the world around them as does the Outsider. How cool is that?
* so as not to muddy the waters any more than necessary, this asterix to the footnote points out one of the better/worse qualities of clarks, vis á vis our interaction with others. Will leave a full explication for another Tuesday. (Hint: we are so terribly concerned with the feelings of others.)
** lol We’ll let the more seasoned Readers explain to our newer Readers how that might make one laugh (Hint: part of the fun of the Doctrine is that it not only allows, it encourages, us to use our imagination. In this case, visual imagination. That’s all we’ll say.)
(Excuse me…where do put my *?)
*Fear. Why do some clarks not “get” the concept? (“ain’t afraid of no ghost”)
As to the Everything Rule – to summon at will. Without provocation. Worthy goal. How much more simple life would be.
Tuesday “memoir mode”. Like it.
P.S. Thank you for setting my day with one of my musical favorites. Not how I was going to begin it (musically). Good timing.
correcto-mundo, caeliferae!
Not to put too fine a point on it, but a fear of the other person becoming self-conscious*
* who said, “Bestow unto others that which you are burdened with… lol
Work eats my week, catching up. Two good posts (yesterday and today).
ty, Miz M