Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
Writing something profound at four-thirty in the morning is like the daydreams of an adolescent, too easy, too quick and remarkably forgettable.
So let’s get ourselfs a RePrint. At least we know it’s durable.
But…but!! Before we do.
the Wakefield Doctrine is a(n) alternate perspective on the world around us and the people who make it up. As a ‘personality theory’ it has three (and only three) types:
- clarks (the Outsider)
- scotts (the Predator)
- rogers (the Herd Member)
We are, all of us, born with the potential of all three, however, settle into one and only one of these. We experience the world, better, our relationship with the world is of the nature of only one. We grow, as must we all, and develop the social strategies that are most effective, given the nature of the world. Out personal reality is that of one (the three predominant worldviews). We spend our early life developing the perfect personality, given the character of the reality in which we exist.
that’s just to not get too rusty… lets find something to read (and maybe a music vid to give Steely Dan a break*)
Monday the Wakefield Doctrine *three personality types, three benefits…three part series*
October 28, 2013Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
the Wakefield Doctrine is predicated on the idea that we all experience the world, to a certain but very significant extent, as a personal reality. These personal realities (referred to as ‘worldviews’) can be categorized as: the world of the Outsider, the world of the Predator and the world of the Herd. The Doctrine further maintains that everyone finds one (of these three) as their predominant worldview at a very early age and what many call personality types and traits are simply the aggregate of behavioral strategies that the individual develops as they mature, in other words, their personality type reflects their personal reality and not the other way around. Lastly, the Wakefield Doctrine holds that while everyone lives their life in one of the three worldviews, we all retain the potential inherent in the other two worldviews; in a sense ‘the other two’ represent the personality type we might have been. Unique in perspective, very productive in application and fun to apply in one’s day-to-day life. the Wakefield Doctrine offers the opportunity to ‘see the world as the other persona experiences it’ and by doing this successfully you will be a in a position to know the other person better than they know themselves.
Personality Type I: ‘the Outsider’ clarks the world is forever ‘out there’ (as opposed to here where they are), clarks are insatiably curious, doggedly persistent, fearful in the conduct of their lives and courageous in defense of friends and family and selfless to the point of self-destructive all in service to their attempts and efforts to find a place in the world around them. clarks think
Personality Type II: ‘the Predator’ scotts, action oriented believers that the only good action is the aggressive action, their world is a simple world of predator and prey, fight or flight, eat or be eaten, scotts are quick to offer help, the first to act, un-shy to the point of promiscuity, mercurial in temperament and violence is within their nature, all without being vindictive, they are natural leaders of whom it may be said, ‘a scott is often wrong, but never uncertain. scotts act
Personality Type III: ‘the Herd Member’ rogers live in a world of connectedness, they are naturally social and gregarious, they are judgmental and impartial, rogers live in a universe that is inherently quantifiable and there is a Right Way to Do Things, where scotts are the conquerors and clarks are the innovators, rogers are the civilizers. responsible for the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Library of Alexandria, rogers invented the Dewey Decimal system and yet, are the first to burn books. Without the rogerian influence, stable society would not exist in order to repress the individual spirit. rogers feel
Benefit 1: to know yourself (for clarks)
Benefit 2: to know the other person (for rogers)
Benefit 3: to gain the advantage through better understanding of the other person (for scotts)
be sure to join us for Part 2 sometime tomorrow!
* Kid Charlemagne been on auto-play the whole weekend (‘yes, there’s gas in the caarr‘) lol sorry! misery loves company
Funny. Reading your first line of intro, I agree and disagree, lol.
(Thinking back to when I returned “to these shores” 10 years ago this month, I typically wrote my posts around that same time, 4:30. Couldn’t sleep past that time or I’d be late for work.)
I do not find it difficult to identify the rogers in my world. The thought that walks in sleepily this morning is: it is obvious they are of the herd and yet, they are of self first (which appears contradictory). rogers begin with themselves. And end with themselves. For, I know this makes sense. Care to address this thought while I go grab a second cup and try to wake up?
organizing principle: (not in proper sequence) I am, we are, they are
I suspect those with deep mathimagical references might produce some cool greco-roman words for (the which is) outside the field, of the field and within the field
Interposed Homomorphism
Δεκάρα! Φίλε!*
* Non me…. culpa est Google
* Google nefas est.
( I am guessing Damn Dude:
Got the dude translation… the damn, not even close! )
How come when I write in Hellenic at your blog it always sends me to spam?😆
aiiyyeee!*
Correcto mundo
Only one reasonable conclusion: WP’s racist/culturalist streak is a mile wide and growing.
*surely most universal lamentation and commentary on the endless perversity of the universe
Perhaps, to a Roger, there’s an “I am the herd” idea running through the subconscious.
yeah, but ‘I’ as in ‘me’ as in ‘the center of it all’
not that I’m being critical…lol
but without rogers there would be not reliable machines and unfair laws