Month: December 2021 | the Wakefield Doctrine Month: December 2021 | the Wakefield Doctrine

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Six Sentence Story bloghop (or, at least, our contribution to that weekly event)

It is. hosted by Denise.

The prompt word:

CHARM

“Loathe as I am to make this request, I need you to get a haircut and visit our friends at Henry Poole & Co., there are matters afoot and forces in play that, unfortunately for you, require skills you willingly surrendered in exchange for your life here in the Order,” the woman sitting behind the plain oak desk began to speak the moment the man crossed the room.

The uncut hair and loose-fitting robe, standard dress in the Order, was favored by Brother Abbott, not the least for the effect of hiding most of his physical qualities and nearly all of his other strengths; it was not uncommon for a passerby to mistake him for a devout, pious and thoroughly innocuous member of a sect, the name of which seemed always just beyond quick recall, of course, the Mother Superior of the London chapter was very much not a stranger.

Brother Abbott felt the fabric of his robe whisper downwards as a deeply buried group of muscles awakened while another set relaxed; had there been an observer, one possessed of hearing sufficiently acute, they would have heard a sigh, of resignation not exhaustion.

“If, before I leave you and surrender this version of myself to tailors and barbers and footmen, allow me to retort: ‘Ephesians 4:22-24 ‘I am the person I have always been, in potential and in actuality, I only lacked the access to this power‘.

“We are aware that what we require of you is abhorrent, Brother Abbott, we very much appreciate, in a manner that may seem manipulative, your skills, no, your talents, honed to razor’s edge long before joining us; it is of a value only enhanced by their scarcity among those inclined to choose the life monastic.

“The devout have, by and large, a gentle charm, and few, if any, have commanded a stage and entertained an opera house full of skeptics and nay-sayers with a variety of diversions from singing bawdy songs to slight-of-hand, even to ventriloquism,” Brother Abbott barely had time to wonder how the woman had managed to leave her seat when she whispered into his ear, “Your quarry is a man of the world with the kind of power that can only come from breeding and wealth; while we will always value your ability to teach, I need the shepherd to become the wolf.”

 

 

Share

Reprint Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

(well, because absolutely nothing says decadent excess better than a Faberge egg)

This is a Reprint Monday post utilizing a Tuesday post from 2016.

We trust no one will have an issue from this, close-but-not-quite, symmetry. (There’s an old saying, “If you think something is related to something else and are surprised, you just haven’t been paying attention.“)

Anyway. This post does require some familiarity with our little personality theory. However, as we’re stated countless times before, ‘Anyone coming back here a second time and reading the entire post is either a clark or a scott (or roger) with a significant secondary clarklike aspect’. Rather than the obvious, ‘What do you mean, secondary aspect?’ Let’s spend a minute considering reality.

For the Wakefield Doctrine, all reality is, at it’s heart and (on) the most intimate level, personal. Not ‘personal reality’ in the sense that one can claim fantastical abilities and magical powers, rather it is ‘personal reality’ in the ‘What the heck is that supposed to mean?!’

… (damn, always a way bigger topic to explain than it is to know), the point is: each predominant worldview, be they the reality of the Outsider(clarks) or the world of the Predator(scotts) or the life of the Herd Member(rogers) is as real as… real as burnt toast. Not a list of interests or inclinations, drives and impulses, tropisms or talents… the world(s) as described for each predominant worldview is as real as real. Than you very much. Furthermore, what makes us clarks, scotts or rogers, is not these qualities, inherited or imprinted but, what makes us clarks, scotts or rogers is growing up in one of the three worlds (personal realities). Because, this growing up always entails developing effective (give or take) social strategies and ways to interact with the world around us and the people who make it up.

A scott acts the way they do because such behavior is most likely to allow them to survive and thrive in the eat-or-be-eaten world of the Predator. And so it is with clarks and rogers. We are all sporting the personality type best suited to the reality in which we grew up and developed our style.

The take-away here? With an understanding of the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine we are able to know more about the other person than they know about themselves. More to the point: we are able to see the world as the other person is experiencing it. And, by doing so, better know ourselfs.

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

megan-fox-joins-new-girl-as-jess-new-roommate

(new readers? note the throat tendons)

With all gratitude to Lewis Carroll and his timeless question, ‘why is a raven like a writing desk?’ I would pose the semi-rhetorical question: What does a scottian woman sound like when she tries to speak rogerian?

Now has never been a better time to…!”

See?! See what I have to contend with? A reality full of Doctrine remnants, relics, and large-sorta-like-in-the-movie-‘Alien’-these-scary-organomechanical structures?

I’m at work today, trying to earn a living. In the process doing the thing that I do, stumbled upon agent website and written across the front, the above (example is abridged) statement, accompanied of course with a very good photo of the afore-referenced scottian female.

If you’re here (and still reading), I’ll assume you’re familiar with one of primary (and, frankly, endearing) characteristic traits*  of those who live in the worldview of the Herd, the rogerian expression. It’s a form/style/idiosyncrasy of language totally specific to our herd-based brethren. Hell, I’ll go further and say that hearing a genuine rogerian expression makes it a leadpipe cinch that you’re dealing with a roger.

But a rogerian expression is more than simply a curious (and amusing) quirk in one’s choice of words. It is not an error (grammatical, rhetorical, any other -cal), it is a deliberate use of the ‘wrong’ words. It is also quite the aggressive act, because even, (and especially face-to-face), the roger employing the expression will exhibit not the slightest sign of self-consciousness or un-certainty. If anything, they will be ‘on high alert’. We students of the Doctrine are trained to watch the roger in a situation where a rogerian expression is being deployed, because we know how everyone else will react. rogers will appear not to notice anything out of the ordinary and the clarks and scotts will be laughing in delighted surprise. Don’t believe me?  Here, in the block quotes, are a few of the rogerian expressions that we’ve recorded.

…looking at his paycheck, a roger was heard to say: ‘oh man! Look at how much they deducted for aggravated security’

…talking about  a new DVD release for a movie: ‘no, I’m going to wait until they release the un-abashed edition’

…about to talk to a client: ‘I know I have to give them the bad news with the good news, I just won’t baby-coat it’

(and the most recent recorded rogerian expression)…

…writing in a blog about how egotistical certain real estate agents tend to be an unknown roger wrote: ‘ I have to say that, as a professional class, most agents are much too self-absorbent…”

 

But this post is not about rogers and rogerian expressions, it’s about scotts and their misuse of language. A scott will misuse language incidentally, on his or her way somewhere else.*  The key difference may seem subtle, as in both cases the malapropism represents an act of aggression. The rogerian expression is a way to exert force within the herd; the goal being to establish dominance over other herd members. Unlike the scott, rogerian dominance is a re-orienting of the focus of the members of the herd, as opposed to the starkly and very intimate one-on-one domination by a scott.

So what does this say about our scottian woman? You best bet is to smile and say, ‘there is no better time than this to do whatever it is you want me to.’

 

*  see?!! it gets under ya skin, I tells ya!

** if you said, ‘yeah 20 feet through the air, on their way for a permanent landing the neck of their unfortunate prey’…. gold star, yo.

*

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

We’re watching the mailbox for the ‘Cease and Desist’ notice from Hallmark Cards.

Quick ‘oT today.

Holiday hours and such…

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

Phyllis, Una, the Wakefield Doctrine, (the) end of Winter, serial writing (the Whitechapel Interlude and the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf), Six Sentence Story, the gift of light, ongoing liberry project, something, something, and… the Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules)

That light to the right for the driveway lamp? Phyllis and her new LED knit hat (in pink, of course) coming back from a walk. Project Blue Book is about to go into reprints

 

Music vids

*

*

*

*

*

 

 

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Six2 Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Blame Ford and Miz Av’ry.

While others have, in the past, contributed more than one Six Sentence Story to our weekly gathering, this year I’m caught up in the metaphor of the Six Sentence Cafe and Bistro.

So, this morning, I’m finishing my reading/commenting at Denise’s bloghop and, at the end of the thumbnails, I come upon two new contributions from the above pair. (I’ll spare all the memory-painting of my own version of the aforementioned bistro/bar and simply say, “Damn! guys, what was that?!”)*

So, while more in the category of (a) back-of-the-envelope variation on a theme, we offer:

The acolyte, the youngest ever admitted to the Order, struggled to seat the soup cauldron in the wooden cart; once his concentration resolved, as the iron pot weighed nearly as much as he, his face relaxed into what his young mind insisted was a neutral expression.

The early morning was still gathering light, like a rag collector harvesting the increasing voids in the fog that swaddled the cobblestone alleys and decorated the brick walls of Whitechapel.

The Order of Lilith demanded study and work from those who felt the calling, but Seth, whose name did not escape the cruel attention of the older boys in his class, had promised himself he would not cling, like a baby clutching a worn, mother-scented blanket, to the images and thoughts of the small handful of Christmas mornings passed.

The peals of St. Paul’s bell tower, surely a first-year rector working out his nerves before one of the most important of Masses, crowded the boy’s thoughts with memories of home, and, his eyes with tears that he brushed aside as he heard the scullery door open.

“All is ready, Brother Abbott,” turning his head away in a hasty effort to evaporate any sign of what the very young or the very old mistakenly consider weakness, Seth grappled with the pull bar that was almost shoulder level.

“I was older than you when I joined the Order,” Brother Abbott held the door as the boy struggled to pulled the cart out onto Thrawl Street, “Yet it took me years to realize that Christmas is a season of the heart and not the purse,” smiling the bearded man continued, “While you are surely missing your family and a tree rooted in brightly wrapped presents, consider that on this morning you are bringing gifts more fair than any you have received: food to the hungry and companionship to the lonely; this will be remembered well past the Yule-time.”

 

 

* thanks to Denise for hosting to all the Sixarians for contributing to an atmosphere and environment so conducive to the writing thing

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted/emcee’d by Denise (No, not the Jazzy Jeff, Dr. Dre sort of DJ, more the Joel Grey… pre-war Berlin or, even, Michael Moorcock style)

This week’s prompt word:

FAIR

The sounds of wind shaped by a foreign geography, and the shuddering of more toilets than are possible in a single family home, eroded my dreams; the invisible security of sleep frayed into translucence, light without provenance whispered, ‘You’re not home!”

Getting ready for the day in a hotel suite is fun, waking up is not.

There’s too great an emotional gradient in the transition from unconsciousness to responsibility; while the comfort of everyday routine usually covers and obscures this most human of border crossings, there are almost always remnants from the night, clinging to our thoughts reminding us of our duty to endure.

“Willkommen, Willkommen, Willkommen…”

Detective Captain Anton Rilke stood up as I entered the hotel’s coffee shop, his arms extended in a non-hug-threatening manner; I had to smile as he exerted the rarest of interpersonal talents, the ability to create a sense of familiarity that both co-opted and engulfed his surroundings.

Behind him, arrayed around the circular table, were my Anya-designated travel companions, each looking at me with expressions ranging from resentment to excitement; like faces on a Tarot deck illustrated by drug-haunted medieval monks, it prompted a line from an old Allman Brothers tune, “Well if you ride, you pay the fare, Satan on your back and he don’t care...”

 

 

Share