Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
Hey, there was something that struck me as interesting, when, after searching for ‘reprints’ in the archives, I settled on the one below, from March 2015
I forget what it was.
The interesting thing, not the post.
oh well, I’m pretty sure it (the mysterious interesting thing*) had to do with writing, seeing how we’re here, Wednesday morning and have not yet started our Six Sentence Story.
The Post is pretty interesting, at first glance, as I scanned it and noticed Taylor Swift has contributed to the post.**
Well. Shall we go and see what our five-years-younger clark was thinking on March 18, 2015?
….! I remember!! (the most interesting thing this morning…. so, I was signing on to one of my bank accounts and it has one of those, ‘We will call you with the secret code’ which is always six digits. Well, this morning I J.B. Rhine three of them bad boys …in a row! (thats all the explanation I’m giving. some of you will know what I mean.) lol
Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
The Wakefield Doctrine can be fun.
The Wakefield Doctrine can help you do better today.
Hey, if you’re new to the Doctrine, lets talk about what you do after (stumbled over) this blog. Wait, don’t laugh (scott), don’t sneer (roger) and clark, wait hold up, don’t go off half prepared.
Damn! I had a really fun Post and then realized that I have to limit my reprints! Shit!
Nothing in the Rules against excerpts!!*
But the Doctrine will take the position that old people will show the characteristics of their individual types very clearly.
- clarks will age the least, ’cause they have been old from the start
- scotts will appear to slow down the least, until they fall over dead
- rogers will get even crankier, even though most laws of physics say that is not even possible (except for the ones that are not… we have Kristi and a few of the other rogers to thank for their example of variations in the expression of the rogerian worldview) (which is simply… more…not more-additional, more-of-the-thing-itself)
- clarks who by definition have missed the whole point of Life, will get increasingly active as they age
- scotts will not notice the physical effects of aging when it starts, the psychological effects they have never noticed
- rogers will sit more, but they will be the most compliant guests in the home, until they stop getting visitors
You know, speaking of age… time does impart change (despite what rogers may wish), and while it is all too easy (or tempting or seemingly necessary) to point out, things are different now. Take live musical performances (please! bar ump bump). I’m comfortable using music to illustrate changes over time because, anyone who would claim to enjoy music must, perforce** accept that all music develops from what has come before…
Taylor Swift (2012 or whatever)
(Note: I doubt I even have to mention this, but I have Taylor Swift’s vid up for 2 reasons: a) I like a lot of her stuff and 2) she is very, terribly popular. There are a ton of modern artists out there that may do a better job of supporting my point and there are surely 2000 lbs of musical acts that would contradict my point. However, this Doctrine is about fun. Speaking of fun, free Wakefield Doctrine hat (‘for your damn head’) to anyone who can tell us Ms Swift’s predominant worldview!!***)
Deep Purple (19 ‘yeah,-we-get-that-you-weren’t-even-born-yet’ 72)
…no, this is not a re-make of ‘This is Spinal Tap’…. that stage is about 12 feet deep and yes, those are ‘roadies’ climbing around the equipment as the band starts playing, since I’ve been to concerts like the one in the vid, I will attest to the fact that the shows were that organized back in the day.
* Rules?!? are there Rules to this here Doctrine here? Well, yes and no.
** yes, I used the word ‘perforce’ did you not read the part about old people?
*** some restriction may apply. This is for old Readers as well as new Readers: you know how you’re with some one, say at the mall or a family reunion or the gym….or even at work and one of you says, ‘man she is such a scott‘ or ‘damn! gots to go deal with what’s his name… what a fricken roger, if I’m not out of his office in 10 minutes find a scott and send them in to rescue me!‘ well, a big part of the fun of this here Doctrine here is to figure the worldview of the people around us, especially when you have someone else who knows the Doctrine. I’ll say right here, when you decide you know the person’s worldview and the other person says, ‘yeah?! why? Why do you think they’re a clark/scott/roger‘ this is not a negative challenge. This is a part of how we’re all learning to identify the three personality types. ….so, if you and I are sitting in a Taylor Swift concert and you say, “She is clearly a …..” be prepared to provide evidence and I will thank you for it. I may not agree (initially or ever)… but this Wakefield Doctrine is a lot of things to a lot of people, but it is not a ‘damn…I’m not sure, better not say, someone will laugh’ personality theory blog.
* a bit redundant, I know! Assuming you’re a clark or have a posture-destroying, blue-flamingo level of secondary clarklike aspect
** not directly, like writing all or parts thereof… but the inclusion of a song of hers…. will be interesting1
- ’cause, well, what could I’d been thinking…. probably something to do with the Wakefield Doctrine, …I hope. lol
The hard part of my day, dealing with the differences in aging of my clients.
The emotional pulls and pushes surely take a toll.