Month: October 2017 | the Wakefield Doctrine Month: October 2017 | the Wakefield Doctrine

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

‘Una standing watch over the house and home’.
Landscape format.
Una is sitting in the picture window that looks out over the driveway and the neighbors backyard.
Nicely apportioned elements make up this photo.
All though the entire field of view is the picture window, Una dominates the right half of the scene. (The window continues behind her but of limited detail.)
Una is presenting her left profile and is looking towards something out of frame to the left. She is focused on whatever it is that has her attention. Her ears are up, two small black triangles that are titled slightly forward which brings our attention to her eyes more than it does to whatever it is she is looking at.
Una is almost entirely black. Fortunately for us, what is not black is both an intimately familiar hue and is associated with those parts that we all know are important. Above her eyes at the inside edge are two beige commas of light coloring. These spots draw our attention to her eye, her lower eye lid, not having fur, reflects the light coming in through the window. The pupils of her are a peanut brittle brown and there is the tiniest of glints of light above the very dark center of her eye.
From the sharp points of her ears, soft-curves take over the definition of Una’s profile. Curving down past her eyes is a straight edge of her snout (un-measurable variations in the black conveys the round curves of her nose down towards her upper lip) to the end of her nose. No surprise that the end of her nose, being free of external hair and fur is marked with a shiny reflection of the outdoor light. Entirely appropriate similarity to the markings of her eyes. Scent rivaling sight as her connection to the world around her.
On the reverse curve her mouth shows as slightly open. Enough to see pale red tongue between ivory white teeth.
Beyond the glass and dominating the entire left half of the photo is the view of the front yard of our house and the backyard of one of our neighbors. The land upon which our house sits (and Una guards) is mostly the land behind the houses that line the street. Our driveway is long and narrow and runs between two of our multiple neighbors. Picture a row of squares, their tops all aligned on the horizontal plane, they present a unified shape. Abutting each other is no problem because they are all square in shape and, in the simplest of terms, when your boundaries are connected by ninety degree angles and your next door neighbor’s boundaries are connected by ninety degree angles, there really is little to argue about.
Until, that is, someone pushes one of the square lots ten feet to the right and the adjoining property is pushed almost ten feet to the left, predictability takes a holiday. When you great a space between two equal squares you force their back boundaries to become more important than they needed to be, Think: upside down T

 

 

This week, on the TToT:  wild turkeys! (the kind with actual feathers, not the ones that convince you that you can catch one and have your very own, all natural Thanksgiving), getting dark way too early, Halloween, a Quinquennial Visit from Vinny the Junkman (and the corresponding archeo-cleaning of the basement), work and the quandary of caring too much, Una, Phyllis, finding a photo of a letter on a mountain side, car chases and much, much more!

(Continuing with the ‘theme’) Brought to you by Josie Two Shoes and the fine, fine, folks at the Ten Things of Thankful (made possible by the dogged determination of an English Gentlewoman who is, most assuredly, by all reckoning, no (direct) relation of CS Lewis.

On with the show!

1)  Una and Phyllis

2) We had a major clean-out of stuff. Interesting process given that Phyllis is a roger and I’m a clark. clarks are not known for seeing the preservation of the past in the form of mementoes, keepsakes, knitted rugs, household expense ledgers, and most text books from school days. rogers, being the force behind continuity and tradition will tend to see things as needing to be saved. clarks are less… concrete. We do have a sentimental streak but it is not usually on display (at least as far as we can tell) and it is not aggressively acquisitive. In any event, we have these clearing of the house (and garage and shed) events every few years and it is a manifestation of the consultative process as most couples experience it.

3) A few years ago I went to Salt Lake City for business. This is a photo from my room in the Grand America hotel. The reason for this being here is that I’m grateful I found the photo. The reason I’m grateful I found it was that when Kristi moved out to Utah recently, she posted a photo of a mountain side with a big letter ‘Y’ on it. My brain said to me, it said, ‘hey clark! that letter is different. what are those Utohians up to?’ Ya gotta open the photo and then zoom in on the upper left quarter where you’ll see a big, white, letter ‘U’

4) Driving on a semi-rural road on a pleasant-enough day:

5) Difficult Clients. Odd Grat Item, fer sure. But, the thing of it, most of the time when there is stress, I can trace the source back within myself to fear. Fear’s a funny thing. “ja ja” (as Friend of the Doctrine, ClairePeek might comment). Common fear is (usually) big and obvious and obnoxious, that kid in the 6th grade of the one in the 10th grade. And, thank god for the good intentions of those of us who populate the virtual world, there is no shortage of advice and strategy when it comes to contending with Fear (the bully). But he has a sister, who is quiet and charming and, (to some of us, irresistible), when first we meet. She’s all, ‘you are this’ and ‘you are that’ and ‘everyone doesn’t understand you the way that I do’. This lower case fear tends to shape our opinions and perceptions of the world and its people, (mostly, it’s people). Her brother Fear pretty much has laid claim to the objective world. Her’s is the voice that says, ‘if you do that, they won’t like you.’ and ‘suppose you’re wrong, can we just talk for a second how bad it might turn out?’ That is the fear causes me more trouble than the, “Hey! Look at how far up we are!!” The lower case, (and way more alluring), fear will touch my arm in a way both exciting and reassuring and say, “Now everyone will read the post, be careful, you don’t want to get to weird.

Thats why I claim ‘Difficult Clients’ as a Grat Item. They provide me with an opportunity to look within and see how I make decisions regarding the world around me. (aka ‘how I relate myself to the world around me’ which is a totally slick segue to the next Grat!

6) The Wakefield Doctrine (well, duh!)

7) Did I say there was a lot of wildlife in our area this year? (no, not that wild life… lol) This is a combined Grat Item. Work and interesting events and technology

8) Sunday Supplement Photo Insert!

‘Phyllis and Una walk up from the pond and pass the treehouse as they head towards the house.’

‘The rock rests on a perch. It’s separation from the earth an indulgence to the ephemeral life-forms that, with the conceit of conscious self-awareness, have raised it on a pedestal nearly as fleeting in permanence as they are; the rock does not wait, it endures.’

 

Phyllis and Una, nearly home, pass the mailboxes that have been drafted into bird feeder duty. They surely are not amused.’

9) This SPACE AVAILABLE (To any almost-ready-to-participate-but-still-would-rather-see-what-it-looks-like-to-put-thoughts-into-words-and-then-put-them-up-there-in-lights Reader. Send in your Grat Item as a Comment.)

10) Secret Rule 1.3

Click here!

This week’s music vid is an old cover of an older song. Given our demographic, the cover will be more familiar than the original. And, as sometimes happens, the cover is, imo, superior to the original (even allowing for musical tastes).

Share

Finnish De Sentence Frejdag -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

I have no idea…
…and I’m pretty sure I don’t want to know…
thanks, Kristi

Being Friday, we’re joining Kristi, Vic and them over at the Finish the Sentence Friday bloghop. The idea is quite simple. A sentence is left un-finished (not Finnish, despite our title). Everyone is invited to complete the sentence and then head over to Kristi’s or Vic’s and link your post. That way everyone else can read and comment.

This week the sentence, it is

When it comes to Halloween…”

“…Halloween is the Highest of all Holidays for my people*.

On that last night of October, we Outsiders are all, like, George Bailey (after being re-programmed by Clarence) or Ebenezer Scrooge (when he wakes up Christmas Morning) or virtually every bride and groom, running through a storm of Minute Rice, racing for the privacy and protection of the waiting limo.

The thing that appeals most to clarks about Halloween is not that we get to be someone else. It’s that, for one evening, we’re not recognizable.

scotts: all cowboys and frankenstein’d and rogers: ballerinas and princesseses are all roaming the neighborhood embracing the social bonding that’s so strong in sanctioned holidays. Their choices, made only a short time before the big evening, are either to stand out (scotts) or to display personal qualities and characteristics that they (rogers) feel have been under appreciated during the other 364 later afternoon/evenings of the year.

clarks anticipate joining a celebration with a freedom possible only by virtue of anonymity. Our costumes tend to be either high contrast or rorschach-blank disguises.

There! that’s what I was looking for, the thing about clarks and Halloween? We looked forward to Halloween because wearing a disguise is not only sanctioned, it’s approved and condoned and admired.

(Funny thing about the choice of a clark’s Halloween costume, while we prefer the anonymous, non-personal ghost/spirit category of dress, maintaining the capacity for speech is critical. I mean, it only makes sense. If we go to all that trouble to disguise ourselves, in the hopes that we might be ‘just another kid’, we still need to able to say something, don’t we? lol**)

So I went through this most Peter Pan-ish celebrations of childhood, trying desperately to experience the world as did ‘the other two’. At least for one evening, it seemed possible that I was not standing apart from, not an Outsider.

Trick and/or Treat

 

* clarks… Outsiders. You know, the friend you have who’s really funny, ‘cept most other people think he/she is weird or kinda messed-up; the one who is really smart and can always see how to help others and yet, when they try to get a job or a girlfriend or an ‘A’, they suddenly get genuinely strange and paint their hair or wear two different colored socks and, for smart people, they’re totally clueless how they’re sabotaging themselves but they mean well and never give up on anyone but themselfs. What? Well, this is the Wakefield Doctrine, after all.

** FTSF note: This is the second FTSF post after a long hiatus and it’s already coming back to me why I was such an avid fan/participant. If one is not careful, the reflections that bounce off the clever arrangement of words into sentences can totally take you back. Parts of the self that were thought to be safely stored in attic trunks marked: CHILDHOOD end up staring back from the screen of a computer, now too far out of reach to retrieve.

 

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Thomas Hobson
(courtesy Wikipedia)

 

 

zoe sez the prompt wood is ‘MENU’

(lets hope there’s some clue in the etymology of this four-letter word. “…from Latin minutus “small,” literally “made smaller,” past participle of minuere “to diminish,” (courtesy of Online Etymology Dictionary ) well, thats a big help.

Lets let the mature-adult-wants-to-be-a-writer take the night off and offer the following Six Sentence Story

MENU

“They’re born with free will, yet ambition and the determination necessary to achieve their destiny are left as un-formed potential they themselves must develop?”

“Yep!” God’s answer, somewhere between laughter and language, sounded to Lucifer just a bit too exuberant.

“It’s like a menu,” being the Almighty, He knew his archangel wouldn’t get the reference, turned and looked at Lucifer; He was aware of how it upset his first-created to have Divine omniscience rubbed in their perfect faces, “You know, when things are identified as being available, but the individual is required to make a choice?”

“Why would you do such a thing,” the Morning Star’s tone was one of simple puzzlement, however his eyes blazed with a far more potent emotion, “I mean you created me and Michael, Gabriel and Raphael, gave us free will and the power to express our potential, yet you’re starting all over again with this man and, what did you call the other one… woe man?”

“‘Woman‘, you know, ’cause she’s, like, from… never mind,” the Almighty’s voice lost its cheerful frivolity and became quieter, nearly sullen, not a good quality, as his archangel knew from experience, “What’s your point, Morning Star?”

Despite the non-metaphoric clouds that gathered around the Creator, the First decided to throw caution to the wind, “It’s like you made us in your image, then, turn around and create these…these ‘humans’ and we’re supposed to exalt them; gotta say I’m not seeing how that makes any sense.”

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- “Kitchen sinks? Those’ll be at the end of Aisle 3”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Una on her Friday walk, being chased by Autumn
This landscape format photo is divided into thirds. The far left third is simple: a car’s windshield in the top half and dashboard in the lower half. The dashboard is a smooth grey surface that shows a faint reflection of the windshield above it. There is a matte-shiny strip of silver metal running on the horizontal along the lower edge of this grey expanse. Through the glass of the windshield (which has an odd shape, like a half-rectangle with dreams of being a circle) we see trees standing against a sky that is curiously devoid of color or detail. There is a blurriness to the leaves (green and yellow) that conveys a sense of motion. For reasons not available in the photo, it’s not clear if it’s us moving past the trees or the trees fleeing something we cannot see.
The right third of the photo is black. No features, reflections, hints at activity or the existence of a clue to it’s nature. Black. Dark. A void of both color and feature.
The middle third of this landscape format photo is where our story begins and ends.
Where the black from the right meets the light from the left we see, in the foreground, the silhouette of a dog. Una. Like one of those optical illusions that insist there are two distinct shapes, all you have to do is decide which you want to believe in and… there it is!
We see a dog shaped by the darkness, a pointing nose slightly concave on the top, a sensuous curve along the lower edge, a prominent chest.
We see Una shaped by light from the windshield, the end of her nose a shiny chicklette, the lighter brown of her eye brows and below that, her eye. (This being a profile, there is still much we must take on faith). She looks forward, and, within the half globe of her eye, a smaller curved square of reflected light.
Her expression is not casual. It is focused on the road ahead and decidedly not on the scene to her immediate right.
To her immediate right, and in the background, (of this middle third of the photo), is the slightly slanted rearview mirror. Attached to the exterior of the passenger door, it affords a view of what is behind the car. In fact, the lozenge-shaped reflection shows the sky and the road that the car is moving away from.
(Pat B. suggests that this is the source of the concern in Una’s eye. I do not totally disagree.)

Hey! It’s Saturday and this is the Ten Things of Thankful.

Simple enough premise: write a list of ten things (people, places or things, dogs, cats, the ambient temperature, the change of seasons, the result of the people in our lives, the institutions that impact our days and memories of those who are no longer physically present. you know, those things.)

Format: ten (or more, or less) comprising a list, a recount, a story or random reminiscence.

1) Josie Two-Shoes for the care and attention she puts into getting this opportunity out there each and every week. I say ‘opportunity’ simply because participation in the TToT is open to any and all who might encounter, follow-up on a rumor or decided to put the scary bloghop stories they heard as young bloggers to rest, “…and once the English woman gathered eight of the best writers she could find, a message appeared, without a return address, that said, ‘Watch your host demographics, Missy’ and, out of nowhere this new(ish) blog, the Wakefield Doctrine showed up on the doorstep, and, like the character Meatloaf played in ‘Fight Club’, he just wouldn’t go away until they invited him to be the 10th host.

2) Phyllis and Una (my not that weird a person credentials)

3) ‘caught-up’ with old friends* at the Finish the Sentence Friday bloghop

4) Friend of the Doctrine, Christine, posted a photo on ‘the Facebook’ that made me smile** She was kind enough to allow me to post it here. And, yes, she was, in fact, one of the original co-hostinae and no, I will not indulge in the obvious joke.***

photo courtesy of Christine Woodruff

October 2017

5) ‘Finish the Sentence Friday is actually the first bloghop I participated in here in the blogosphere. Back then, it was an exciting time and, with a keyboard full of parentheseseses and an extra italics pencil**** I was made to feel welcome by the real people who hosted it. That being a total bonus, seeing how then, as now, I am driven by the Doctrine for which I am eternally grateful (number 6)

6) the Wakefield Doctrine. As I appear to be inferring in Item 5 (or alluding to, not really sure which is more better the word.*****) the Wakefield Doctrine has provided the energy, the nerve, the disregard of my normal tendency to avoid the spotlight, all in the service of telling people about our little personality theory. It (the Wakefield Doctrine and it’s promulgation) is nothing less than a passion.

7) Anyone who has only one (or two) Grat Items, would enjoy seeing it ‘in print’ but doesn’t have the time to write a whole post around it (unlike some writer’s I could mention)… send it in as a Comment and I’ll post it here. (If you don’t mind the ‘weird by association effect’  lol) We have a Grat

 7) I am thankful for you – Clark! (from Phyllis)

8) the Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules)

9)

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

* yeah, I know… a clark ‘catching up with old friends’ image: standing adjacent to a group of people who are laughing and talking amongst themselves, except…. the clark is almost totally facing the group1

** who said ‘two worms on the sidewalk a day after a rain’? 2

*** famous story about her family’s first (or second year) at the farm

**** why yes! it does look like a carpenter’s pencil, except it has a triangular profile and the lead is red(ish)

***** ok, lets check. Why you’re completely correct! I totally go to the dictionary when I write posts and am comfortable with that because, well, it’s one of the scant and questionable advantages of being a clark 3 infer v allude   ( allude: ‘To refer to something indirectly or by suggestion’   infer: To introduce (something) as a reasoned conclusion; to conclude by reasoning or deduction, as from premises or evidence’ (courtesy WikiDiff)  gonna go with ‘just like the Doctrine says!’)

1) well, sure, he sorta keeps watch on the rest of the room, but still, almost totally facing the group

2) well, no, your little metaphor is not inappropriate, in fact it is kinda effective as one of the First Order identifiers of clarks is the ‘pressed lip smile’ ..you know what that looks like (‘desire restrained by caution’)

3) well, its the thing about how we all have a thing/quality/characteristic, or perhaps it’s better to say that the reality we experience the world from, conveys certain qualities…. in any event, clarks have no self-consciousness whatsoever about not knowing stuff, hence the looking up of words (rather, the mentioning of looking up words and such)

 

this week’s music

 

Share

Finish The … -the Wakefield Doctrine- Sentence Friday

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Hey! It’s Kristi and her bloghop, Finish the Sentence Friday. Talk about the curtains of near past parting! We were, like, in the same home room in the Ninth Grade at Blog High!

Back then, her and Stephanie and Janine and Kenya and them were like the total writer-grrls, when I slipped in the side-entrance on ‘the Facebook’, Mr. Newbie A Blogwriter. In fact, FTSF was the first bloghop I got involved in and, hell, through those weekly posts, I came to meet most of the people who I count as friends, all these years later. (Blogyears are like dog years only different. The ramp is steeper initially/ 1 blog year = 1 year in the ‘real’ world, 2 blog years = 23 years in the real world. Then the curve flattens out and, for me, having been ‘here’ since 2009, that makes me 89 ‘real’ years old, which isn’t quite the actual number).

Anyway. This week’s prompt:

“Why Do People Write…”

It happens that I know precisely why I write. Better I say, ‘I know precisely why I started writing’. Prior to June 2009 writing was not a feature of my reality, at least not as a diversion or form of expression or, in any manner, a common interest shared by friends. I started writing because I needed to express the Wakefield Doctrine. I made the decision to write a blog for that reason. Everything from that point on has been in the service of explaining and presenting ‘the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers’ to as many different people as I possibly could manage.

The internet in general, and the blogosphere in particular, have a whole bunch of people who hang out, express opinion, and generally interact socially, albeit, virtually. I went where the blog took me, which included, of course, ‘the Facebook’. And that’s when my ‘need to write’ really took off. I met people who had blogs and people who ran bloghops and I quickly became aware of the fact that I needed to learn to write better. Just so I could hang out with my new friends. Not that anyone said anything, however I recognized that the price of years of daydreaming through English and Composition classes had finally come due.

That’s why I write.

The Wakefield Doctrine is a peculiar thing, particularly in the context of a person who is a clark. The Wakefield Doctrine became my passion and because of that, while there was never any question that I might stop writing, I needed to speed up the improvement of my skills. I thought, go hang out with people who write better than you and, if they don’t throw you out, you’re bound to get better; all through the years of writing a post a day, through the cycles of ‘hey! that wasn’t bad’….. ‘oh my god, I suck at this writing thing!’ I’ve persevered and while I still cycle between, “hey I’m not so bad at this writing thing‘ and ‘god, this wouldn’t get me a D in 10th Grade English!’, I know this is a common condition among those who believe that if an idea or a view on life is written with enough willingness to risk ridicule, others will encourage and support you.

Kristi is one of those early people I was lucky to have met. (Don’t tell her, but in real life? if I encountered her somewhere, I wouldn’t have had the nerve to introduce myself.) Fortunately, I hung in with the blog posts and the bloghops and such and I consider the opportunity to get to hang out with her and the others I count as friends to be a total, fricken gift from the internet.

…that was a fairly long way to say, “I write to know that there are people in this world who I can connect with and, by doing so, enhance my life.”

Share