Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

We need a scott to write this Thursday’s Guest Post Thursday’s Guest Post, but the thing is… there are a lot (and I mean, a lot) of Readers with significant secondary scottian aspects out there. (Not that that’s a bad thing! the secondary aspect, when it is scottian, is what allows a clark to: raise his voice, take us for a walk through the woods in a video, write words on our face and make the point that everyone else was too conventional to make, to move to another state for a job that offers so much more (everything), to stand up at the Parents Conference (or any other conference) and not only disagree with the ‘experts’ who sit on a pile of their own metaphorical droppings, (the better to be clearly above the audience) but to make the point that should be made… you know,  that element to our worldviews that allows for moments of realness that is in total contrast with the normal, semi-transparent state that we live out our difficult, frustrating and, at times trying lives. as to the effect of a secondary scottian aspect (on a) predominate rogerian worldview?  do-not-ask. seriously. (you do not want to know, especially those of you who are, after looking around at the others, are preparing to say words to the effect: “why I believe that most of us would be interested. It would be in the interest of a complete understanding of this Doctrine, if you do not hold back anything. I believe I speak for all of us when I say, tell us about the rogers with the secondary scottian aspect.”)

I need a scott. This series, the TGPT series is fun (and I have managed to gain insights into the Doctrine that I it might have taken me months to discover on my own, what with the Posts written by  Jean and Christine and Dyanne and Joy. The thing is I need is one more scott.  and, it needs to be a scott who can write  (well, that’s not literally true, I would accept a video post from a scott… damn! there’s a concept!  can you all imagine what a scottian video post would look/sound like?  …well, actually I can, seeing as how I did a number of vid Posts with glenn in them. But he’s busy with his music career and same for the Progenitor scott, so it’s gots to be someone new.

Now, as much as we appreciate the gesture, we cannot accept offers (to write) from rogers or clarks, we need a person whose predominant worldview is that of a Predator.  For this coming Thursday. (anyone smirking, please contact the administrator immediately).

Some key points relating to the nature and character of the scottian personality type:

• scotts are leaders (because they are certain, not necessarily right, but certain).
• scotts are emotional in a way different from rogers. It is spontaneous emotion, there is very little holding of grudges,  mercurial is the best descriptor for their emotional environment.
• In a band it is always a scott who is the ‘front man’, they are natural performers, entertainers
• At a party scotts will not hesitate to introduce themselves (to everyone), they will always, ‘work the room’ moving from person to person, group to group
• For the most part, when confronted with a threat, a scott will choose to attack rather than flee, however if it is clearly a ‘no win’ a scott may chose ‘flight’
• scottian females can be remarkably sexy or intelligent and erudite, but hardly ever both.

The eyes. scotts have a distinctive ‘focus’, their gaze is never incidental to their mood, the conversation they are engaged in, or anything other than being aware of their surroundings.  a scott will always be watching the surrounding environment for threats and opportunity.