“…Thursday’s Child is bored to tears” the Wakefield Doctrine ‘why, yes! no, it wouldn’t hurt to take a break…just for today’ | the Wakefield Doctrine “…Thursday’s Child is bored to tears” the Wakefield Doctrine ‘why, yes! no, it wouldn’t hurt to take a break…just for today’ | the Wakefield Doctrine

“…Thursday’s Child is bored to tears” the Wakefield Doctrine ‘why, yes! no, it wouldn’t hurt to take a break…just for today’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Lindenwood Playground Pre_1920

damn! tough week so far, what with the new concepts and ways of looking and/or applying our little personality theory, non?

but! all of you, the New Readers and the …not new Readers, have been most admirable in your comprehension(ing) and questions following each Post!  As you know, the Wakefield Doctrine is not only a unique and remarkably useful tool for understanding the behavior of people in our lives, but it’s also fun! And, as the old adage about the correct ratio of labor to laughter holds, a little break in the week’s grind would be the right thing for today’s Post! There is still one more day in Neutronium Week, but, if there is going to be an exam tomorrow, the least we can do is try to get you all off-guard and over-confident, ya know?

So from our near-gigantic collection of video Posts, here are a few to look at and laugh over and treasure and, hey… you’re on that date, (that you thought you’d never get with a person that there is no way in hell that you have even the hint of a chance at getting a shot at…. and you’re back at their place… and ‘the tipping point’ is approaching (you know, “hey! I really had a good time tonight….”) well, you better come up with something quick!!   Please, allow us! we got your back! so go ahead and say something about how you have to get up early to write a Post….  and as soon as you hear the words,  “oh, you write a blog?”  whip out that smart phone, dial up this here Post here,  and you’ll be deciding where to go for breakfast before you know it!)

…no, you’re welcome!

vids:

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. zoe says:

    you mean youll be deciding where to go by yourself for breakfast right? frist?

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      lol

      FRIST it is!

      (aww, come on, Doctrine vids have got to have ‘etchings’ and/or genuine hand made ‘batiks’ beat hands down!! it’s the 21st C’s … ‘just for a minute, I have to get up early’)

  2. frist!!!

  3. zoe says:

    did you get out and pick cotton… glen is one hell of a solid scott huh?

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      zoe

      yeah… strong predominate, but enough secondary clarklike aspect to be fun ( you know, like the herding class breeds of dogs, german shepherds et al… ” this breed is known for exhibiting a good work ethic, needs to have something to do, otherwise will chew and be otherwise destructive, requires strong hand on lead to maintain alpha position.“)

      interesting point, though…. there is nothing in the Doctrine that requires that everyone have significant secondary or tertiary aspects, just that the potential is there. A scott or a roger (or even a clark) with no secondary aspect tends not to show any curiosity in elements of the world that do no directly reflect their predominant worldview… something for all of us to keep in mind when recruiting

      • zoe says:

        I suspect without a second or terciary the psych community would be pathologizing these individuals into Asperger’s syndrome for the focus factor alone…The temptation is always there….goddamned roger talkin in my head….

        • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

          yeah… I get the sense that clark look a lot like those asparaguses … but then again scotts look a lot like Type A and rogers are deadringers for an ENTB3+*
          lucky for all of us, we got the Wakefield Doctrine that (allows) for all of those real (and the popular) personality ‘theories’ to be abso-fuckin’lutely correct…and efficacious and totally verifiable.

          *Oscar Meyers Briggs

        • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

          lol

          couldn’t resist… my delayed scottian aspect lol

  4. oh well next time!!!

  5. wait a sec…the Doctrine as a handy tool for seductions???? this is a whole new world!!! Wow!
    would you grant rights to a Doctine hat and Doctrine shirt being used in a “spicy” romance novel???? jeh

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      well, not that I am quite in a position to do any fieldwork, but hell yeah! (you know…. now that you mention it, maybe my college aged self is desperately trying to acquire a tool… something to help a self-blocking clark…nah! I would remember that by now….right?)

      lol I do like the way you think, you are a credit to the pack!

      oh yeah… sure! as long as the protagonist is tall and despite a nearly total inability to maintain eye contact and speak above a mumble… lol never mind just wouldn’t be a credible character lol