in search of ‘the write time’ the Wakefield Doctrine ‘when the best time to write, …changes’ | the Wakefield Doctrine in search of ‘the write time’ the Wakefield Doctrine ‘when the best time to write, …changes’ | the Wakefield Doctrine

in search of ‘the write time’ the Wakefield Doctrine ‘when the best time to write, …changes’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

top-ten-luxury-brands-sexy-ads-2_thumb300x200

Well, this can’t be ‘the best time’ to write, I’m in the middle of a workday afternoon!

Maybe it’s a seasonal change to the ebb and flow of energy, maybe, (as Friend of the Doctrine, Jean, suggests), it’s the change of Daylight Savings Time, of course, being  clark, it could be as simple an explanation as:  I’m imagining it.  More likely, (and more promising as a Post topic),  it’s a shift in the psycho-subjective component* of (my) circadian rhythm; something within that has normally triggered my brain to go into neologistic ontogeny,*** sort of like getting horny in the morning (for guys) or wanting to cook a meal or knit a home (for women). That may very well be what has happened! Although, using the manifestation of my other drives at different times of day as an example, I’m not feeling like listening to anyone’s dreams for a peaceful world or inviting her up to see my etchings, Post writing-istically speaking, that is.

Maybe it’s later in the the day.  Check back here a little later, maybe we could go see a foreign film and then have an aperitif, ya know?

(oh! yeah!  you’re right!  gotta get some Doctrine content in for the New Reader),  this weird Post? of the three personality types:

  1. a clark would have thought of the idea in the first place and, (possibly), overcome their fear of presuming the right to the attention of the people that are likely to read the blog
  2. a scott would have laughed and encouraged the writer (“hey!! don’t forget to be outrageous… saying something shocking!!  come on!!)
  3. a roger would have smiled and been encouraging and, as a result, possibly caused the writer to re-think the whole thing and, satisfied that they made their friends laugh, left it unpublished.

…there is a saying here at the Doctrine: ‘clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel‘   and so if you are a clark and find yourself with the impulse to do something, then you would do well to look to your scottian aspect and if you are a scott and suddenly have an urge to examine your motives (to act) and the consequences and effects of these acts on others…. then you have a major secondary clarklike aspect and if you’re a roger and you feel the need to answer every question directly and dispassionately and without artifice then you need to go back to bed!  Remember: we all do everything at one time or another, it just comes down to how we relate ourselves to ‘it’

 

* not a real word**

** yet

*** hate to say it 1, might be a valid term, even if I made it up

1) no, not really

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Have you ever looked at Taschen? Better than etchings. Have you ever had Teucher chocolate?
    Better than knitting or possibly even better than making up words. Maybe, jny

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      thank you for that feedback, Jean

      I think that has helped me to realize that my ‘write time’ has not migrated to mid-weekday-afternoons, at least not just yet lol

  2. Joy Christi says:

    Anytime the words come out, doesn’t that make it the ‘right’ time? Or the write time? Or is it the right write time? Right?

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      Joy

      lol yeah, I guess that’s true. It’s just that sometimes it’s a tug of war between, ‘hey! you better write something otherwise if too much time goes by, it will be gone and you won’t be able to do this anymore’ and ‘jeez quality v quantity ever come into consideration?’

      The one thing I always have done is write anyway, knowing the the secondary benefit of blogging is that I can write something tomorrow and bury the POst’s that I am not so happy with, ya know?

  3. lrconsiderer says:

    That girl is thirteen kinds of half-naked.

    I have never in my life tried to knit a house.

    I might be asleep.

    One of the above statements isn’t not true.

  4. lrconsiderer says:

    I spoke nothing unto the veracity of the other two…