What you don’t know, can help you! A Guide to Personality Types | the Wakefield Doctrine What you don’t know, can help you! A Guide to Personality Types | the Wakefield Doctrine

What you don’t know, can help you! A Guide to Personality Types

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

The Doctrine blog continues, now in it’s third year.

In the course of the last 24 months, we have established the following:

the Wakefield Doctrine tells us that everyone  fits into one of three personality types: clark, scott (or) roger.  Knowing the characteristics of these three personality types, enables you to better understand, have an advantage on (or) better relate to the other person. 
You and I (and everyone else) is born with the capacity to understand and experience and relate to the world as any of these three types. At an early age, we (all) become one of the three, but never, ever lose the capacity to live in the reality of the other two types.
When the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers states that a person is a clark or a scott or a roger and describes how that person perceives the world,  it is intended that you understand that the person being described is not behaving a certain way arbitrarily or by choice. We believe that in the most fundamental way, a clark experiences the world differently than does a scott or a roger (and the scott from the roger and the clark and so forth).  This apect of our view on understanding personality types accounts for the superiority of the Wakefield Doctrine over all other personalty typing/theories/schema.

What do you want from a personality theory, anyway?

  • increase your understanding of why people behave as they do
  • know in advance how a person will react to any situation
  • have fun while learning what your girlfriend/boyfriend/mother/father/boss/employee/friend/enemy really thinks of you
  • wear a hat (on your damn head) that only a few people in the world have the right (to wear)
  • be a part of something that will grow and become cool, before anyone else does

Join the Wakefield Doctrine Fan Club!  Sign up here or go to the FaceBook page*  or if you are in a studious frame of mind then maybe the Redux would be more to your pleasure.

So don’t let another day go by without signing up for the Wakefield Doctrine!!

(That woman? On the ‘front page? Well, since you asked, that’s Ora Louise Clark Farley. Here click this.)

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Denise aka Downspring#1 says:

    Let’s just jump to the Ora Louise reference. Some would say “only a clark could find something like that!”. And those people would be right because they know what that means “only a clark”.
    The “how to’s” are all right here in The Wakefield Doctrine. How much do you have to read to know that clarks are the collectors/purveyors supreme of knowledge – of all sorts, useful or not, interesting or not? Most people get the basics in no time. That’s no time at all. We all know that clarks are the “odd” ones. Wait! Let’s change that to “unique” or maybe my all time favorite “different”. We know this just like we know that rogers are the “joiners” of the three. For the most part. What they prefer/need/like most is to be a part of a larger thing. A thing that does not value the individual as much as the whole. Consistency, predictability, stability. What can be said of scotts? All sorts of things for they certainly will not go unnoticed and because of that they generate energy. They have a certain sumpin’, sumpin’ that can make a person hate, adore, despise or otherwise react to some degree. For a scott, that’s all in a days work (search for sustenance).

  2. AKH says:

    or a denise clark?
    or a clark clark?
    or a ……..