Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers).
Another Saturday Night…gas tank on full..dashboard active…Wakefield………… damn! this Doctrine is fun!
In attendance this Saturday: glenn (riding shotgun); Ms AKH ( dans le tableau de bord) and Progenitor roger with a first for this new world of auto-conversation… he made the first ‘call-in’ (while we were already en conversacione ).
The weather was fairly inclement, we kept to the route.
But that’s not important now… however, we will be informing you how to participate in our new “Ask a DownSpring” semi-live webcast-ette. But for now lets talk about the reason we are at this here blog here.
- the Wakefield Doctrine is a way of looking at the world, but mostly looking at the people in that world
- the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers maintains that there are 3 characteristic ways that all people experience the world around them
- the Wakefield Doctrine refers to these three ways as living life as clarks, as scotts or as rogers
- the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers maintains everything we do and everything we are arises from this view
- The Wakefield Doctrine offers one type (clark or scott or roger) the opportunity to see the world as the other two (clark or scott or roger) experience it.
- the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers maintains that we start out life with the potential of all three, but pick one and try to forget about the other two.
- the Wakefield Doctrine believes that personality type is nothing more than appropriate behavior, that it is the world that is different (in one of three ways) not an individual’s selection of traits and responses and inclinations.
- the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers maintains that clarks view the world as an outsider does, that they are apart from everyone else and that everything around them is not supportive, to the point of being inimical
- the Wakefield Doctrine suggests that all people are capable of going beyond their chosen way of viewing the world ( clarks, scotts and rogers) and adding to their abilities to cope with the challenges of life.
- the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers maintains that scotts see the world as a predator does, to be on the alert for threats from greater predators and to be on the alert for prey comprises most of their day to day lives
- the Wakefield Doctrine suggests that by identifying with the way that the ‘other person’ experiences the world we enhance our own lives
- the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers maintains that rogers are the ones that experience the world (and life) as a member of, a part of, an aspect of a world comprised of relationships
- the Wakefield Doctrine offers everyone the opportunity to understand why the people in our lives behave the way that they do
- the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers maintains that if a person can accept the fact that the other person is literally living in a (slightly) different world then conflict is eliminated
- the Wakefield Doctrine offers everyone the chance to be more, to live fuller lives, to understand others, to not be confounded by the actions of others, to not be a victim of the behavior of others.
- the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers maintains that when it comes to living with others, we pretty much got it covered
- the Wakefield Doctrine is not free nor is it easy and it is definitely not for everyone
- the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers requires a certain capacity to understand, a flexibility of intelligence that is necessary for a person to not simply ‘get it’ but to be able to use it to their own benefit
- the Wakefield Doctrine is a unique, useful and fun way to finally make sense of the behavior of those people in our lives; at home, at work, in school or at play.
That’ll do. New Readers? We are not just all about the work! We ‘borrow’ videos from the youtube and we have ourselfs a good ole time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRE7idEq2Ak
Yes, let’s “ask a Downspring”…..
Second vid – Girl with Clark Kent glasses – clark. She removes glasses, shedding conservative “school girl” look…
Blonde girl with short hair? In “cheerleader” garb? scott
What happens at the end of the video ? Enough said.
Lest some of you men out there think there is too much attention given to the sexual component herein let me attempt to clarify my statement above.
If you read about clarks and female clarks in particular, you will see(in the 2nd music vid) that the “clark kent” glasses are a simple, clarklike stand apart style statement. It is not intentional to “stand out” or “stand apart”, it is simply personal expression. clarks do not ever wish to be the center of attention. Having said that, it is fairly characteristic for female clarks to otherwise “shock” those who have a preconceived notion of them. Surprise(s) in some form or other is often associated with female clarks. But doesn’ that speak more to the expectations, (way of viewing the world) of the person interacting with a female clark? or male clark for that matter?
Take the scottian “cheerleader” girl in the video. Read about scotts and then think of the scottian women in your life. Are they not high maintenance? Do they not require attention more than a clark for instance? Do they not enjoy being the center of attention and almost always the life of the party? The energy that accompanies a scott is always of the literal in your face kind.
Sometimes it is “easier” to understand the dynamics of the Wakefield Doctrine by “seeing” it in a music video or film clip. Actions sometimes speak louder than words.
true dat
well said. was gonna leave an entire dissertation but again, something shiny just caught my eye.
No! Get back here. I want to hear your dissertation.