Hey, yo clarks…it’s Saturday and the other two have the weekend starting. They both know this is a time when they are entitled and (in the case of rogers) required to relax and have fun and engage in all things not of the work week. You, (being a clark) know nothing of this…this is a day as are all other days. Sure, you may aspire to having the feeling of enjoying some ‘time off’, relief from the weeks organised work, hell you may even have a situation in which you have weekends off, but you and I both know that it is not the same (as it is with those other two, scott and roger).
So, am glad you are still reading. I hope you can continue to ‘set aside momentarily’ your inclination to dismiss this blog as something that you have already got covered in your own system of understanding (the world) and see if you cannot benefit from this Wakefield Doctrine thing. And it is to the clarks that I speak today…”no, scott, no special music videos and nothing of a sexy exotic nature”…just clarks stopping for a moment to see if we can’t maybe help each other out a bit. (As to our rogerianReaders), they are totally into ‘hey! it’s my weekend can’t you see how much I have earned the right to be even more self-absorbed than I am during the rest of the week”? lol Yeah.
OK. Post for and to the clarks. Hey! come back I have just started!
I could cut and paste stuff from the clarks page, about how we live in our heads, and think a lot and do not show emotion but we are past that at this point. There simply is not a roger or a scott still reading this…so it is us here. I know that you know that I know…etc…blah…etc. Fine we have established our credentials, identified ourselves it is up to me to offer something that you have not yet thought of, or have not been willing to think too loudly, much less try and discuss it with one of the others.
Fine. I am willing to play. Here’s the thing…we can accept our low self concept/esteem, in fact it is a point of pride with us…sort of like the person who has overcome a handicap…we own it and accept it and there is hardly anyone in the world that is qualified to discuss this topic (with us).
Sure.
Understood.
I get the knowing/thinking thing. And I am sure there are clarks who are better than I am at thinking/analyzing even better at describing and expressing what it is to be inside the head of (and therefore to live in the world of) a clark.
Difference is I have experienced the alteration of my clarklike nature. (Sorry no insult intended but for dramatic purposes I have to do the following, even though I know that you know). Notice and re-read what I just said…I have experienced…alteration…clarklike nature…I did not say:
“I have learned to…” or “I think differently”…I have not even said anything about “discovering something new, a key to understanding…”
I have experienced an alteration in my clarklike nature. Am still a clark( lol ya think? ) but have something in addition to…
So, welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)…I think we better go find those other two…roger is probably swelling up in emotional intensity…sort of getting wider and lower to the ground with the severity of their sincere and heartfelt nature…and the scotts lol god knows what they are up to!..I don’t hear any cries of torment, maybe they have found something old and worn to gnaw on…they are such simple creatures… but fun…
So come back when you are ready to Comment…we will be here…I think…ya never know…lol
fuck that greaser 50s rock and roll or country music that scotts so love that they turn into little pre-teen girls at the thought of, bless their simple scottian hearts…and roger’s idea of music…I’m sorry I do not believe that I am quite qualified, in an acedemistical sort of way to criticise the music that most rogers will beat people over the head with, for their obvious lack of qualifications to enjoy…
(oh before we go…) you know that just because we are self-conscious and mumble and all that sort of thing does not mean that we are not to found in the spotlight…I offer as a closing example a clark we can all be proud of…
Hold on…just discussing Doctrine matters with DownSpring#1…and she made a statement about my doing something better than someone else which resulted in my success at “being taken under their wing”…
…now you’re clark…you like the sound of that…”under their wing”…tell me I’m lying. DS#1 insisted that the choice of words was ‘accidental’ that she did not mean it that way…
If you want to ever have the slightest hope of doing that which you have been trying to do your entire damn lives, you must be prepared to accept the fact that it is always your choice…and it is not the words that matter, it is the fact that the words we choose are the instructions we give to the world out there…instructions as to how we are to be regarded…as clarks
But you are still reading because a) you remember that all people have the potential to be any of the three, a clark, a scott or a roger and b) this potential does not ‘go away’ or wear off it is always possible to add the qualities to what we are and finally c) clarks are the only one of the three that think that improving themselves is not only a good idea, it is a necessary idea…because of d) the central idea of a clark is way beyond the scope of this particular Post…but you have earned another video!!
…good clarkie… you made it this far! …take a penny, please
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7RCQhuRdhw
Fuck you.
“…and it is not the words that matter, it is the fact that the words we choose are the instructions we give to the world out there…instructions as to how we are to be regarded…as clarks”
I agree with this statement. I cannot attribute my own statement (under wing) as deriving from anything other than a subconscious choice of any number of “common phrases” used in the English language stored in my clark like brain. The important thing to me is I realized exactly upon uttering the last word that I committed a most heinous thing – speaking as a clark who has not been privy to the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers. I immediately knew that I was witnessing, as if looking down on my dying body, the behavoir of a clark in automatic pilot mode.
Which brings me to say out loud that since the inception of this blog I have been more mindful of the dynamics of interpersonal relationships of …..clarks, scotts and rogers. It has been a helpful tool with which to work on my self evolution, my quest for balance(as only clarks are wont to do). I have to admit I have enjoyed the challenge and at times have been quite entertained.
In counterpoint to the Jimi vid, I must offer by way of You Tube an example of a musical female clark.
Damn, I used to be in love with Aimee (NO, Mr. Miller, not in THAT way. Head out of gutter)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UegRj0SJuqo
lol…a good statement…liked video (sound off at the moment) but even without hearing her I sees a clark…
But interestingly enough, the benefit the Wakefield Doctrine is not in the knowledge contained herein, it is the evidence of a clark actually doing something…outloud…in public…despite the contrary energy from both within and without…
As stated above (for clarks) it is the experience of another clark that is helpful here…not “how to” but “fact of”
you been told….
Side note: Hendrix playing left-handed in this vid—but NOT playing a right-handed guitar upside down as he usually did. The low strings are on top where they belong. Did not know he could do that. And, DS1, stop already with the MR. MILLER. So preferred, Glenn baby. Or just baby. I’m SO fuckin’ lonely…