You’re searching for good times, but just wait and see | the Wakefield Doctrine You’re searching for good times, but just wait and see | the Wakefield Doctrine

You’re searching for good times, but just wait and see

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXvKRZRofDE

Mr. B we thank you for your efforts, even though this little experimental writing effort will totally confuse our Readers.

No, I think that this being a Friday, our Readers are accustomed to Posts that seem to have no perceivable rationale, make no sense and just seems to act as a filler to keep a Post-a-Day streak alive.  Funny though how the process works, looking for a topic, raking over things that float to the top of the brain and then browsing images (for Google we thank god), and just hope enough words coming out to comprise a Post.  The seeds of this particular ‘pearl’ seems to be conversation with the Progenitor roger and his new little experiment of a blog, (yes Janie, I am aware that a pearl is a clams way to deal with an irritant…”solidified clam puke”?…lol no I have not heard that one…back to the end of the Post where you can be introduced).  That conversation and a Comment made by DownSpring glenn about old and time.

Which concludes our Doctrine less for this Post.  It is easy, no make that it is impossible not to see that clarks are the creative ones of the three.  After all the saying is: clarks are the scientists, scotts are the salesmen and rogers are the machine operators.  This categorization holds and is consistent with the nature of the three.  Another way of saying that rogers are the accountants, engineers, lawyers and doctors (who all believe in a quantifiable universe) and scotts are the salesmen, leaders (both political and religious) and the person who screams “get in the hole” at golf tournaments and finally clarks are the creative ones, creative in the pure sense of the word, they bring forth the genuinely new, think the Christopher Lloyd character, Doc in ” Back to the Future”.

No, this is going to end up being one of the shorter Posts in recent time.  I really don’t think we are pulling off the “backwards writing of the Post”.  Nah, don’t really care.  I think that as long as there is a music video, a catchy photo and….( alright, and a charming high school student with clever asides) then it is ok to hit publish.  No, not really cheating, you have to stop trying to do this literally backwards, the only way to pull that off would be to write it forwards and copy it backwards.  I agree not the point just go with what feels right.

Hah, like a clark ever gets that spontaneous.  That is not gonna happen.  At least there will be a Doctrine lesson in this and a music video and I think I will use one of the Alice photos and maybe hope for something random as the front will be the back in all this.  So everyone bear with me, this will be over sooner than you realise and there will be the music video to reward your efforts. (No fair jumping forward, scott) or is that jumping backwards.

Sorry am/was stuck with some notion of time running backwards or the sequence being backwards un-folding.  I seem to remember something about the story of Merlin or Arthur or one of those fuckin half-hearted rogerian over-blown semi-epics describing the character as living his life in reverse.
As all too often happens, especially whan I do not have a genuinely good idea, I latch onto an odd idea (…as if…lol… ) and try to shape it enough to hit Publish.

So, why not let’s do a Post as Alice might see all running in reverse.  Yes, I know there is nothing about Alice in Wonderland that has anything to do with living in reverse time, but there is also nothing to do with glenns Comment on yesterday’s Post and (my) response alluding to “Of Mice and Men”   go figure.

YEah, why not this would then be the punchline…in front.

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one