keep on pushin, straight ahead | the Wakefield Doctrine keep on pushin, straight ahead | the Wakefield Doctrine

keep on pushin, straight ahead

So we succeeded with yesterday’s Post in writing in a tone that only scotts could read it…

what is written in these Posts must be lost on the other two.  Today we are writing to one of the three  today, and tho’ there is no need to say which of the three ( clark or scott or roger ), there is only one target.

A “24” themed Post? What are you talking about??!

(6:03 am) wtf!  cut it out!  you got to think this out!!…

(6:04 am) ok not stop it…sure a cool idea, write a Post in real time with the clock ‘ticking’ like in the show “24” ( …hey I don’t believe you have ever watched the show!… ) cut it out! if we are going to try this we don’t have time for asides done by virtual high school students (…virtually brilliant… ) yeah I know.

(6:07 am) god…this sucks. A good idea, I admit but why waste it with a “I thought of it and therefore I have to do it now…” jeez how about a little preparation, hey for that matter how about a little respect for a good idea, (…lol how about a little speed-typing lesson…lol) no? alright lets do a set-up, thats allowable, isn’t it?

(6:09 am) OK heres the deal today…Post written in real time…one hour (…counting the time for the coffee…and does that include spellcheck…?)

(6:10am) I was going to write about yesterdays Post. In fact you will see a clip of it at the top which is referencing the idea that I was writing to one of the the three (clarks, scotts or rogers) and the measure of the ‘sucess’ of the Post would be measured by “who” wrote a Comment.   Well, I would like to say that we have a winner

(6:13 am) hey, thats not too bad, the time thing is slowing down, I surely can finish this and get my spellcheck done and find photo….(shit, I forgot the find a photo, damn)…don’t get nervous…back to exposition for now…

(6:15 am) The Winner:  scotts….no, actually the winner is your damn writer…lol there..if you had any problem that (yes, I know you get it, clark but for the other two you gots to spell it out) the Post (yesterday) was written to appeal to the scottian Reader…this mistaken reference to the scott the center of attention, as opposed to the fact that the credit and therefore attention should be on the clark who actually wrote the fuckin thing…

(6:17 am) ( ok you need to start worrying about time…you can’t go past the 3/4 mark writing ’cause you so have to edit this thing.)  (damn what happened to Janie? I thought she was going to carry the “aside” portion of the this Post.)  And you having never seen the stupid show, you had to go and try to latch onto another “clever” hook, meanwhile you are running out of parentheses…

(6:20 am) And so while we should be spending today’s Post analyzing why yesterdays’ Post was so scottian, instead we will be trying to finish this weird-ass “24” tribute thing. Thanks glenn and Ms. AKH for your Comments ( AKH’s actually came in the Sunday Post, but I know it was prompted by the (scottian) Monday)….stop! what are you doing rambling on about yesterdays’ (…I’m back…there was an episode of the Simpsons where Homer was in a steak eating contest with some other character…before the contest starts…Homer sits at the table…really nervous and starts eating the bread at the table (Marge to seal the joke says, “stop filling up on bread”….see I can tell a joke”)

(6:25 am) Damn. Better go get some photos…and have not even thought about music…(Mr. B!!! I need you to go and get something with a “time going by too fast” theme from our youtube “partners”…and Janie…photos…think photos…I want everyone back here by 6:44 to wrap this thing up!!)

(6:38 am) damn!!! time to edit and pull this thing together!!! Mr. B?? you all set?  What do you mean, “Trust Me”,? thats kind of what got you into the minor supporting role you find yourself in, isn’t it? Fuck, there are those who would maintain that it should be the theory of clarks, scotts and barrys, (…not very catchy! lol I have the still photos!!…) Alright  lets just focus on hitting ‘Publish’ at 6:59 am, ‘people’! (…hey!! what do ‘you’  mean…’people’…)

(6:41 am) And in conclusion, we thank our scottian Readers for reacting so clearly and un-equivcalbly (…lol…the spellcheck will cost you more time than the word is worth…) for demonstrating that it is within the body of knowledge presently contained in the Wakefield Doctrine to “craft the message” to one or more of the three types, deliberately…

(6:44 am)…time to wrap this up people…!

(6:47 am) where are those ‘stills’?

(6:55 am) OK  everyone! last look and last type…thanks for your co operation in pulling off yet another tfw Post…Hey Slovenianss your Romanian brothers is in da house!!

(6:59 am) in 5…4…3… … …

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnuYhFRYbAw
Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one