may the circle be unbroken, by and by, lord, by and by | the Wakefield Doctrine may the circle be unbroken, by and by, lord, by and by | the Wakefield Doctrine

may the circle be unbroken, by and by, lord, by and by

…short Post today…much to do, much to do.

…a spirited discussion is threatening to develop in the Comments section of the last Post.  All stemming from the question of (musical) artistry.  Pretty simple question, wouldn’t you think?  Well, actually we all know how totally subjective a label of ‘good art’ or ‘bad art’ can be, but what is most enjoyable about the exchange is the demonstration of the applicability of the Wakefield Doctrine (…sigghhh…tap, tap, tap…) and how, whether the participants are aware of it or not, they are demonstrating that the underlying concept of the Doctrine is quite valid. (…another longer way of saying this is…), you must forgive the impatience of youth that our Miss Sullivan is evincing in her charmingly…hey! a brown fox just ran through the woods behind my yard (…was it a speedy, russet-hued fox ^^… ). No, seriously!  I did just see a fox run by, with something in it’s mouth…the beauty of nature. ( …so a little  litera veritas?… )

So, as I was saying, a short Post this am.  We will be posting an Interview with (Friend of the Doctrine) Mel sometime next week, ( ask him if he really is a cook or is he a CEO of a large Wall Street outfit who gets his karmic jollies pretending to live in the midwest… ), let’s not be rude, we must be good hosts or we will not get anyone else to consent to ‘come on the Doctrine‘…and you know what that would mean… (more of these painfully patched together, hope no one pays too close attention to the amount of space devoted to trying to establish another ‘voice’ in the form of a high school student…a girl high school student, no less…my god have you stepped back and read this yet?… ) well, yes, yes I do know what you mean.

But what are they going to do?  Stop reading?  No, no, wait… let me…  “as if”  (lol).  Hey, that was fun, I like assuming another persona ( …err other persona here…you are drifting out of the eccentrically amusing lane and are scraping the side moldings on the guardrails of mental stability…do you read…over… ) No, seriously.  I have had some conversation with other ‘people’ at the Doctrine about this, about Janie and them.  They (the DownSprings and Prognitor that I speak with) all just nod their heads and make what they think are ‘I’m listening’ noises, until I stop talking.  Well I appreciate their input.  I don’t know what I would do without their invaluable input and support.  Really, I can’t imagine what the Wakefield Doctrine would be without them. (…yayy!! not a single word in italics…I am one impressed construct... ) But I digress and I really have to get out there and do whatever it is I do in real life.

(…the Doctrine lesson…? you did create me to keep your focus…and that ‘real life’ thing? we need to talk… ) yes, of course.

I think the lesson today is what I mentioned earlier about the discussion going on in the Comments in the last two Posts.  Ostensibly an argument over who is the better musical performer, Louis Prima or Erika, what I am getting from this exchange is a validation of the  notion that we experience the world differently, this notion is the foundation of the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers).  So good work to those who took the time to contribute to this thing.

A little weekend music?  some light and not requiring a lot of thought? on the ‘pop’ end of the spectrum?

Nice…not exactly pop music but…what it that? another? (I apologise if this has been used in a previous Post) (but it is not as if any one is going to write in and say something…)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWnBD6n9j74
Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one