‘R’ -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘rogers’ | the Wakefield Doctrine ‘R’ -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘rogers’ | the Wakefield Doctrine

‘R’ -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘rogers’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

R

clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel

That tells you most of what you need to know to get started:

  • learning the Wakefield Doctrine
  • practicing the Wakefield Doctrine
  • (and, if you’re a clark,) benefitting from the use of the Wakefield Doctrine

so, while there’s a whole page here that will explain why it is that rogers behave the way that they do and what the world looks like from their perspective, lets just employ the ever-popular blogging device, ie.e “5 things you didn’t know about rogers and 3 things that you’d rather we didn’t feel the need to mention!”

  1. rogers live in a perfect world
  2. (if you’re a clark) rogers will see you before you see them and will have already made their decision
  3. rogers believe that they hate the way that they behave with other people, (but when you hear them apologize profusely, that is not one of those times)
  4. the person who introduces you to the day-to-day routine at the new job and uses the phrase ‘…we call this the bible’ ?  yeah they’re the roger you need to keep your eye on

and

  1. clarks are fond of rogers (but love scotts), scotts are fond of clarks (but love rogers) and rogers have an irresistible disdain for anyone who does not treat them badly on first encounter
  2. if you’re a clark, there is a way to deal with rogers when they, (the rogers) are being difficult but, although you, (the clark) are capable of achieving the necessary state of mind,  you cannot maintain it past the  situation that requires it (if you could, you’d be a scott)
  3. all rogers know that the world makes sense and is, at its essence, ‘good and sufficient’ and, (all rogers), seek to practice the perfect way to do something/anything/all things and, they will try to achieve this by reading history (which can be the books of a library or the fables of earlier people, the tradition of a family or the stories one person may pass on that describes those who came before)… the goal is to ….exemplify the (kind of/style of/belief in) behavior of those who history (to their reading) has conveyed honor upon.

…that plus! if we didn’t have rogers you would not want to have to fly from Newark to Biloxi in a plane designed and built by a scott!

  • jet airliners designed by scotts:  very fast with at least 5 or 6 engines (not necessarily required to get off the ground, but make them louder than frickin anything)
  • a part of the cabin has a basketball net/hockey/or batters box
  • the stewards would have to wear bathing suits… male or female  and they would carry those little air horn things (can of compressed air) to warn the unruly passengers or just in case they get bored
  • the flight deck would have windows that open, so the pilot could yell at passing jets

0r a clark:

  • instead of normal seats, there would be couches with pillows and quilts (that would have a disturbing tendency to slide around when the plane has to bank for final approach)
  • the stewardesses would be scotts and stewards would be rogers
  • there would be a bathroom-to-passenger ratio of nothing less than 1:2

…ok, enough silliness.

without rogers we would not have:

  • enduring and stable cultures
  • CPA level accounting
  • a judicial system
  • ships in bottles
  • civil war re-enacting
  • Carl Rogers
  • Fess Parker (aka Davy Crockett)
  • civil wars
  • most medical procedures (not involving surgery… that’s from you know who)
  • Aesop’s Fables
  • Mrs. O’Leary
  • Ken Burns
  • Shaker furniture
  • Bible/ Torah/ Quran/the Vedas/ Book of Mormon
  • Fabergé egg(s)
  • effective oncology

so if you are a roger, let me say, ‘Hey!! good work. Love the Sistine Chapel and the Spanish Inquisition. Tell us about how it used to be!’

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. valj2750 says:

    Frist. Where would the world be without Shaker furniture? I mean, come on.

  2. Gotta love the rogers. I try. :P

  3. ivy says:

    Number 2 in your “we would rather not know list” is so true of my Clark… and number three is mildly true of my roger in that I like to read history but hate to hear about it and never want to repeat it for glory or otherwise.I guess my clark is too primary and wants to stay in the wings unnoticed.

  4. It’s amazing to listen (not see) a roger interacting – strike that – reacting to a scott in a casual work setting. Dynamics are totally different when the roger is “interacting” with another roger or talking at a clark. Love this Doctrine :D

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      yeah… I wish I could write a post sufficiently informative that all the Readers could get to the point that you are referring to….i.e. hearing the panting of the rogers when the scottian female enters the scene (visual: little dogs sit so upright, panting and hoping for the attention of the scott maybe even sitting upright!)

  5. dyannedillon says:

    There would be streamers on that airplane, too!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      lol… and those twirly things on a stick!! (yeah, even with…especially with jet engines!)