Whats the deal with the weird photo? when will you clarks learn that there is such a thing as too much weirdness? the Wakefield Doctrine says: help the clarks first, the other two can catch up later | the Wakefield Doctrine Whats the deal with the weird photo? when will you clarks learn that there is such a thing as too much weirdness? the Wakefield Doctrine says: help the clarks first, the other two can catch up later | the Wakefield Doctrine

Whats the deal with the weird photo? when will you clarks learn that there is such a thing as too much weirdness? the Wakefield Doctrine says: help the clarks first, the other two can catch up later

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the personality theory that you can put into use today! )

Hello. Mind if I try out a section of the future Wakefield Doctrine book on you? I have been finding that sitting down and trying to write about the Wakefield Doctrine in the type clear, orderly and logically presented appropriate to a serious book totally locks my brain up.  And that’s funny ’cause once you get the basic premise of the Doctrine down, everywhere you look you see clarks and scotts and rogers doing clarklike and scottian and rogerian things! But the Book Project (fortunately) involves a person who has written real books and her influence is to require that this Doctrine of ours is presented in a fashion that the targeted book-buying audience is going to respond to, and that style is so not these Posts! Not that there is anything wrong with these Posts! We always try to remind new Readers that the Pages on this blog is where the background information is to be found and the Posts are where the ‘conversation’ is taking place.

Well, that’s probably all the delay I can get out of writing a Post (instead of getting new Content for the book down ‘on paper’).  …but since you are reading this, there are a number of things we know pretty certain:

  • you’re probably a clark
  • you most likely have a blog of your own (or are just about ready to start one)
  • if you get past a certain point in learning this Wakefield Doctrine it will have an effect on your reality
  • chances are you have a system (of explaining the world to yourself) and depending on you, this is blog is helpful or it is a threat and a waste of your time

Enough about clarks! All of us here know you are out there and are reading/scanning/skimming/’damn! back at the weird Doctrine place again! One of the reasons we are going to the all this effort to write this blog and all is that the Doctrine can be useful to you. Today. In your own life. Without being too weird about it.  (well, maybe a little weird)

….a word about being weird. This is directed to the predominately clarklike readership.

clarks ?  we know you are creative… we know the things that you do are not just to make the other people think twice (well, maybe a little) …we know that you are not being different only because you want people to know that you are here…  we know that the things you wear and the things you do are the ‘normal, totally appropriate, no-other-response-would-make-sense behavior for anyone existing in the kind of world that you find yourself in… and we know that you are looking for an answer.  …and no, we are not saying that the Wakefield Doctrine is ‘The Answer’ … (if you are a clark and you have reached a certain level of understanding of yourself, you know that there never will be an Answer… sorry, just the way it is for you clarks.  …you know there should be an Answer  you can see no other alternative than to keep searching and looking for the facts, the information, the thing you somehow missed that will let you be …whatever/however you describe it… real? not different? a part of… doesn’t matter… what does is that this Doctrine has something that you will find useful in your search, it might make a good add-on for your own system, it might serve as a basis for forming a system of your own (hell, you have enough odd parts and notions to create 3 or 4 systems of understanding)…  but one thing about the Wakefield Doctrine   here you are not the Outsider.

Music?  Why not!

 

 

lol thats why not!

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Downspring#1 says:

    Well, I guess we’ll never know what happens in a room full of clarks, now will we? LOL Should we cancel the party? Speaking of parties, I actually threw one once and to my surprise it was a success! For a clark to deliberately invite more than 2 people over for a social gathering, other than a holiday thing, for the purpose of “socializing” seems to me….scary. At least it did then – when I was younger. I imagine young clarks today are more adept at the “social” thing as there is a virtual world at the fingertips in which to practice. Whoah! Thought I heard some rumblings out there…..not….true?

    Lovely listening selection today. Right down a clark’s alley if he/she be in a proper frame of mind. What is a “proper” frame of mind for a clark? One might automatically assume “analytical”. Others may posit that clarks are always ‘far away” (“and far to see, lovely angel come to me”). Who recognizes the quote in parens?
    I think that whoever can identify the quote without the use of a computer…should get a Wakefield Doctrine hat!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      …not to be rogerian, but I think the word is “far away, far to be, ‘friendly’ angel come to me” Simply to price I know where it comes from, an not qualified to win one, of course

  2. Jennifer says:

    Um excuse me but it’s “far to SEE”

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      anyone out there want to win a hat or what? hell… someone answer correctly, I’ll throw in a damn Tee Shirt, is all I’ll do!

  3. Downspring#1 says:

    AAGH! It was late and I was tired. OF COURSE it was “friendly”. But why did I write “lovely”?!