but it really feels like a Monday | the Wakefield Doctrine but it really feels like a Monday | the Wakefield Doctrine

but it really feels like a Monday

So, what would you like to talk about today?  Oh, thats right! you don’t talk, I do all the talking and you just sit out there and read these words…and then (all three of you) write a Comment, throw something back  ’cause you like the music video that I stick on the end of all these Posts.
How many Posts?  I’m glad you asked!  This Post (the one that you are reading, idiot) is number 151.  Now, of course the Progenitors will read this and get all excited, for reasons known only to Progenitors.  The rest of you just sit and try to read without moving your lips too much.

Alright, since I am not going to break my streak just because you people just sit there (or write Comments that are nothing more than demands for attention to your needs), then I think I will interview you for this Post.  Here is how it will work: you the Reader will be indicated by READER and I will be indicated by WD (standing for Wakefield Doctrine.) So let’s get this thing going, I am getting bored already.

WD: So… welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine.
READER: Hey what’s the music gonna be today, why don’t you play some more of the stuff that I like…

WD: Well first I would like to ask you some questions…
READER: Sure, whatever…do you know that I have a theory too?

WD: That’s really very interesting…so, tell us what keeps you coming back to this blog?
READER: Hey you’re real fuckin funny sometimes, ya know…I like it when you have those older vids on I don’t like it when you play the new music, that’s just a buncha crap anyway…I really don’t know why I bother coming to your site, I suppose it is just to be of help, I always try to help.

WD: So, you have a theory of your own?  Is it about the world or life or what?
READER: Oh it’s about everything, it’s a little like yours but it has more features and it is useful in a lot of ways, but you wouldn’t get a lot of it but some of it is really funny and interesting.

WD: And where would I find this theory, do you have a site or a blog or what are you doing with it currently?
READER: Oh yeah, it’s almost ready, I’m waiting because I have a couple of more features and then I will take it public in a big way, it will have a universal appeal and people just won’t believe it, it’s so cool and I’ll bet if I get a little lucky and the right people see it, it will really take off, not like this thing here, not that it’s bad or anything but it doesn’t really make anything happen, I think if you changed the layout a little and spent more time in giving practical advice you will get more people to read it.

WD: Why I am sure you’re absolutely correct.  So, tell me do you tell other people about this blog or the Wakefield Doctrine in general.
READER: Oh sure.  I will talk to people I know, but usually there are not situations where I can mention this, we spend so much time every day doing the things that need to be done, you know what you need?  You need to find other people to join you in writing this…you know a co-liberation of the ideas.  That way you would have a lot of other people writing and everyone would find it much more appealing.

WD: Yeah, so tell me…what do you like the most and dislike the most about the Wakefield Doctrine?
READER: Not enough music, more music ya gotta play more of the stuff that I like…and if you would let others in and somehow have them write a part of the Post each time you would find a greater appeal to everyone except for differentialists, those people are just plain weird and nobody likes them…noobody and if you just add a couple of more types and one or two Principles, not being critical but it is just that you have not quite covered it all…you’re welcome…call me if you want any help with that.

WD: Well I want to thank the Reader for sitting with us and letting us get an idea of how the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) is doing these days.  Granted that this is totally a “placeholder Post”, but what the hell, I’ll find some clever photos/images and a music video and hit that ol Publish button.
…maybe tomorrow I will have a legitimate idea/topic for a Post…the good thing about these kinds of Posts, there is very little editing necessary.  Not sure why that is, probably because my mind is not racing on ahead of my fingers, there are no surprises in the stream of thought that I am trying to express.  Whatever.

( …cause it would be too weird…lol…yeah even for these guys…) (…cut it out Jimmy…not funny Britney…don’t you dare …err I have I question!!…)

Yes? virtual high school student? are we that unable to ‘get off stage’  that even with as poor an excuse for a Post as the one above, I am going to resort to this?…

( …yes, yes you are…lol…isn’t there supposed to be a ‘Lesson’ in the Wakefield Doctrine in every Post….and a follow-up questions?… )

…I suppose…ok real quick the Lesson in the Post today is just this, whether you think so or not, whether you want to or not, no matter what, the concept of the Wakefield Doctrine is a feature of your frame of reference (ask a clark, there’s one right over there!…of course you don’t see them…) and will be a factor in your life.  Now if you are a scott or a roger you are totally saying, “yeah? so what? this does not effect/affect me at all”.
Well, sorry little buddies you are only half as right as you would hope to be, to prove my point….today…don’t notice that roger.

…alright and the follow-up?

( …err…never mind…gotta get to school…normal virtual life…at school….have an awesome day…. )

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Downspring#1 says:

    Thank you Progenitor clark.
    I’ve fallen in love all over again – Jimi, you “still my beating heart”. I always marvel at a clark’s unique interpretive/artistic skills.

    The Jimi vid hit home the concept of balance – of the need for complimentary elements. Could Noel and Mitch have been Jimi’s scott and roger?

    P.S. I did not write this comment simply because I liked the vid. Honest:)