Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [an Ian Devereaux Six] | the Wakefield Doctrine Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [an Ian Devereaux Six] | the Wakefield Doctrine

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [an Ian Devereaux Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, constrained by a sentence limit (high and low) of six, there are worse ways to spend the remaining time you have on earth.

Previously…

Prompt word:

RING

“Well, no, I don’t think I’m between a rock and a hard place.”

Pacing the reception area of my agency, Desiderata Investigations & Conflict Resolution, my admin/receptionist, Hazel sat at her desk and pretended not to care. I stopped to re-stack the magazines on the small table between the two chairs for clients to sit and wait when either they arrived early for their appointment or I was late for their appointment; three People Magazines, one Sports Illustrated, a single Car & Driver and, honest-to-god, a Readers Digest; this last was the most worn and dog-eared which makes me think I need to consider my client base demographic, surely all their kids and grandkids can’t be perfect law-abiding citizens.

I continued to pace,

“So, tell me again Ian, about this Anya person; I wasn’t working here when you got involved with the heiress and the nun and her, was I?”

I sat in the left-hand client chair across from Hazel’s desk and though I couldn’t for the life of me remember how much I paid her, it was money well spent.

“No, it was my first real case and, well, of the principals, the Woman in Chicago is the one I didn’t have you put in your three-ring binder labeled: ‘Client Greeting Cards list.”

 

 

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Frank Hubeny says:

    I see that Anya was Ian’s first client. Hazel does seem to be able to loyally run the whole operation herself. As an employee, that does sound like money well spent.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      actually, not quite a client, more a matter of a significant incidental character in his first case (but Anya appeared in a non-Ian Devereaux mystery prior to ‘the Case of the Missing Starr’)

  2. Misky says:

    If Ian doesn’t know how much Hazel is paid, then she must be signing her own cheques — in which case I reckon she’s well paid.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      I suspect he doesn’t sweat the small stuff, a good working relationship (especially in a small business setting) cannot be bought or, at very least bribed

  3. She’s worth it, and if you meant that “low-abiding citizens” bit, thanks, it gave me a good laugh.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      yes…absolutely totally on purpose!!

      lol ty M. glad you enjoyed it funny thing about writing, I worked on the that phrase, that part of the sentence that was to have been the punchline… and I read it a number of times (even magnified/zoomed in on the type which helps sometimes) but the discrepancy between what I wrote and what I types simply did not register. sure keeps a clever guy humble no?)

  4. That was a long time ago – heiress and the nun and… Anya. Seems as if Hazel’s been around forever (she is a darned good “therapist”). On second thought, maybe Ian shouldn’t tell Hazel about Anya! No one ever wants to be on her radar, lol

  5. Chris Hall says:

    Hazel is excellent. Very clever and that Anya, hmm. Well, at least we know a little more. Love the title ‘ Woman in Chicago’. Shame it’s snowing there.