Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

 

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, constrained by a sentence limit (high and low) of six, there are worse ways to spend the remaining time you have on earth.

Prompt word:

FLAT

It was not the best of times, but then is there a good time to lose the air in a car tire?

No, but there is an endless continuum of contexts in which such a motor vehicle-specific mishap can manifest, i.e. Time of: day/year/life-stages or Place: defined in terms of geograph-/ic/ologic/y; the one unavoidable fact of life is that it’s got to be somewhere and sometime.

The case we are using here to fulfill a social contract this evening involves a young man and a young woman and, as already established, the time and the place of the automotive deflation is the heart (soon-to-be-broken) and the soul (youth is envied by the old, courtesy in most cases of a selective memory) of our tale. While it is actuarially correct to assign the descriptor ‘young’ to both of the parties involved, it is a given that in many cultures the half-life of ‘young’ can be tragically different between men and women.

And so, because Mankind has been gifted by a deity otherwise distracted by His efforts to prove the worth of his creation, most humans are capable of creating reality in an endless variety and scale. From a grandiose tale of a galaxy far, far away to a little memory nugget about a young man and a woman in a car with a flat tire this gift comes with a price arguably greater than the fruit-centered one as the couple in the car on a dark country road are consumed by the fact that not every story has a happy ending.

*

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Misky says:

    Now, that’s what I call a “cliffhanger”.

  2. Chris Hall says:

    …and the next episode???

  3. Frank Hubeny says:

    I hope he can figure out how to change the tire. I guess I better also hope there is a spare in the trunk. Looking forward to see just how unhappy this ending might be.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      thanks. Frank… yeah nothing humans are not resigned to accepting as part of their humanity

  4. Happy or not, I trust that’s not the ending of this tale!

  5. On a practical note neither of them might think of but the parents might, this is where AAA comes in very handy.

  6. Violet Lentz says:

    I love this description! a deity otherwise distracted, I will have to use it in conversation!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      by all means (with, of course, the usual caveat about weird observations share with ‘real’ people lol)

  7. Liz H-H says:

    Much as we try to detach by pointing at the deity, the grit and heartache of everyday living breaks through. Hope they had some good times in the meanwhile…