Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [an Ian Devereaux Six] | the Wakefield Doctrine Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [an Ian Devereaux Six] | the Wakefield Doctrine

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [an Ian Devereaux Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, constrained by a sentence limit (high and low) of six, there are worse ways to spend the remaining time you have on earth.

Previously…

Prompt word:

BREED

“Hazel, I need you to clear my calendar for the next…”

I was looking at my phone as I stepped into the reception area, my head full of memories of a trip to Europe necessitated by accepting Leanne as a client the first time. Her husband was killed over there in a car wreck; I was aided in my investigation by a German detective who looked like Sargeant Shultz, an intriguing secret organization and an impressively-scary woman in Chicago. Still not sure which of those last two still gave me nightmares.

My part-time admin had the all-too-rare ability to anticipate rather than require explicit instruction, so the silence that met my half-formed sentence was pretty loud; being the born-diplomat, I added a simple, neutral, interrogative, “What?”

I began to realize this was one of those times I was expected to know what she was thinking and extrapolate from there; she was staring at the steno pad on her desk, tapping the blotter with her pen, and while they say familiarity breeds contempt, the look on her face was the angular-opposite fractal of that attitude and much more akin to something the apocryphal child-raised-by-a-tiger-in-the-jungle would recognize.

After the temperature of my self-imposed cauldron reached the desired temperature, she looked me in the eye and, with a barely-there playful undertone, asked, “Do you need me to spell it out?”

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Lol. Yeah.
    Excellent scene.

  2. Misky says:

    Probably, yes. Nouns and a few verbs should do the trick.

    A visual treat that’s only lacking buttered popcorn.

  3. Violet Lentz says:

    Love the picture=- Love the Sgt. Schultz reference- And you outta know I love me a sharp cookie!

  4. Frank Hubeny says:

    To “anticipate rather than require explicit instruction” is indeed an all-too-rare quality in an employee. Unfortunately, in turn, the boss would need to know what such a rare employee is planning to do without instruction.

    Those two ought to get married.

  5. Yes, spell it out, I always have to.