Friday’s CCL -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Friday’s CCL -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Friday’s CCL -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to jenne and ceayr‘s bloghop, ‘the Unicorn Challenge

Only rule (yeah, bet they sometimes regret that elegant approach to conformity): top word limit of 250.

 

Apropos of neither the view nor his state of mind, the man said, “Korzybski was, somehow, astute in his understanding Man’s desire to dream and yet clueless to the world-not-seen, the spiritual realm. Must of been the engineer in him. ‘The map, in fact, is the territory’. It’s just a question of having the correct passport, visa or letters of transit to get there, ya know?”

The woman at his side laughed.

It’s been said that, because of their being the source of life, women never truly laugh. They might exhibit joyful amusement and, true to their nature, offer invitation to others to join in their experience of explosive delight at the folly of humankind. But laugh? No.

That she offered an approximation of laughter was part of what bound the couple together. Arguably it is what binds most couples. An exchange of artifacts from two worlds: the laughter of Man, loud, cruel bold and life-affirming swapped with the laughter of Women, secret, tender and passionate.

The two stood together. The dry-iodine scent of ocean air and reedy whiffs of atavistic pheromones encouraged their senses to remember. And they stood in silence until the sun set.

Neither wondered how they might better appreciate the vista before them, the lover’s embrace of Earth and Sea was the only eternal truth.

 

*

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. jenne49 says:

    ‘…the lover’s embrace of Earth and Sea was the only eternal truth.’
    Beautifully poetic telling of the complementarity of Mars and Venus, Clark.
    And now I’m scratching my head, wondering if the map is or isn’t the territory.
    I’m tending towards ‘isn’t’…

  2. ceayr says:

    Philosophy, anthropology, biochemistry and romance all wrapped up in a wee poetic bow.
    Nae bad, Clark, nae bad at a’

  3. The map is the territory — that’s one will keep you up at night if you let it.

  4. Clearly, you’ve never heard me laugh.
    Provocative bit of writing, dude.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      true

      and thank you very much… “Why, sometimes Iwe’ve believed written as many as six impossible provocative things before breakfast”*

      We have, of late** been concerned that perhaps we’ve lost a quality that, if the level of participation back in the day was any indication, was enjoyed by many

      *shout out to Lewis C for the original quote
      ** will leave Will alone this morning

  5. Violet Lentz says:

    Now that was a brilliantly crafted piece. From its insights into the female psyche to its rational on how the seat of laughter differs between the sexes. Bravo, Clark

  6. Chris Hall says:

    Very fab. The two planets and the Earth betwixt… and then the sea, the sea…