Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [a Café Six] | the Wakefield Doctrine Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [a Café Six] | the Wakefield Doctrine

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [a Café Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop

Hosted by Denise, defined by sentence quantity.

Hey! The other half of the conversation? Here.

Prompt word:

PARCEL

“Do you mind if I take this call?”

The tall, thin man watched Rosette Storme, the non-verbal signals played across her face and body like a Postal Service truck exploding over the Grand Canyon in a shower of cardboard and Tyvek’d parcels; he kept his phone a chaste half-inch from his ear until she nodded a half-smile of submission.

“Yes, Mr. Devereaux, I’ve been expecting your call, and now is, in fact, a very good time to talk.”

The Proprietor raised his eyebrows in a manner at once conciliatory yet demanding, every parent’s protest that what they had to do was harder on them than the child; taking a cigarette from a case that would have stocked the Café’s bar for a month of St. Patrick’s Days, Rosette stared back with the dispassionate  concentration of a neurosurgeon reading an MRI scan next to a sedated patient, head already shaved, insensate yet alive.

“I have neither the desire nor the inclination to make this in any way an adversarial relationship…

…I’d hardly consider my wardrobe to be your greatest concern…

….since you’ve brought it up, I have the greatest respect for Mr. Caesare, while Miz Storme is acceptable to everyone here, there is no reason for Mr. Caesare to have any reason to be concerned with her well-being.”

*

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Love your dual perspective/”other half of the conversation” Six(es), Clark.
    A most excellent second sentence. As in your first Six, you leave us with a teaser of a last sentence, raising an interesting question or two.

  2. phyllis says:

    always love spending time with the Tall thin man and accomplices; thank you.

  3. Spira says:

    What Denise said.

  4. Frank Hubeny says:

    Nice phrase: “he kept his phone a chaste half-inch from his ear” I’ve been imagining Rosetta as Lou’s daughter, but I am beginning to wonder if she might be the Proprietor’s.

  5. Misky says:

    It’s the former tone of his conversation that would make me inclined to grab a flack jacket.

  6. I get the feeling she’s safe with us, although she might not want to recognize it.

  7. Chris Hall says:

    Moving on… and more things to know. Excellent.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      ty
      and thanks for your own adventures as a Proprietor, I see you tie in to a story from ago, and we’re all connected in a certain metaphorical nightspot

Leave a Reply