TToT-the Wakefield Doctrine- Grat-by-the-Numbers | the Wakefield Doctrine TToT-the Wakefield Doctrine- Grat-by-the-Numbers | the Wakefield Doctrine

TToT-the Wakefield Doctrine- Grat-by-the-Numbers

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful bloghop.

You know how, when a favorite TV show (or whatever they’re called in the present-day world of entertainment by anything other than your friends and/or spouse) gets caught up in something like a writer’s strike or fallow period (creative-istically speaking)? For reasons too complex (and not sufficiently entertaining) we’re going to resort to what is sometimes referred to as a ‘bottle episode‘ (kinda, not really).  A more accurate label would be found in our post-subtitle above. Reference to one of our favorite shows in Grat 8

So, without further ado (adieu? ah-choo!?!) Here is the Wakefield Doctrine’s TToT bottle episode. Feel free to comment any constructive suggestions. (Other than, of course, “Where’s Lizzi!??! She’d never have done a fill-in the blanks TToT! I want a seat on the Board of Hostinae!”)

That last is quite valid… all applications submitted in comments… err better you send them to either Mimi or Misky or Denise… probably keep the sarcasm down.

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

6) (10;51 am EST) Misky’s Comment. (see below).

[nb. New Readers, Writers-on-the-Fence-about-participating? That’s how non-stressful this grat ‘hop really is. This ain’t no literary-infused reflection on the day-side of the Human Condition! Hey, they let us join. That pretty-much tells you everything about editorial oversight and standards for admission, ya know?] lol

7)

8) Community If you can’t find it out there, check back with us

9)

10)

 

music vids

*

*

*

a buncha photos, you know to illustrate and/or pad the list

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Misky says:

    Even when you’ve “bottled it”, I manage a grin.

Leave a Reply