Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise the only rule is: six sentences in length.

Prompt Word:

PLATFORM

“Damn vehicular peristalsis…’

The sole occupant of the car felt a mental finger depress a well-worn, (so worn that if one could see it, they would observe a cream-colored rounded-corner protrusion, somewhere between the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex), and in the slightly concave surface, a faded-black letter ‘O’,  the man’s ‘Out-loud thinking’ button.

“What did you say?”

The sole passenger’s face had the look of affectionately-patient resignation, the corners of her mouth a true telltale, the time-pressed creases of age rose upwards; her partner’s youthful eccentricities, like some wines, a handful of paintings and all of love, smoothed themselves over time into endearingly creative expressions.

As traffic resumed forward motion, she recalled the conclusion of his last bi-decade physical; his physician made a point of mentioning a certain behavior/syndrome common to a certain stage of life, “The Latin phrase is: ‘Quo profundiores cogitationes sunt, eo majore apud nos loquimur’.

“I think therefore I mutter,” The man, stepping off the ledge-platform that stuck out of the end of the exam table, continued,

“We,” looking at his wife, perched on the only seating that didn’t have stirrups or a covering of white paper, “have an agreement that, when in public she will look at me and nod, like we were in a conversation and I will refrain from swearing excessively.”

 

 

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Frank Hubeny says:

    I like how he and his wife handled his “I think therefore I mutter” syndrome. I also like how he has better things to do than visit the doctor more than once a “bi-decade”.

  2. Misky says:

    That final sentence produced a honest laugh-out-loud response. I so enjoy reading your Sixes.

  3. phyllis says:

    great image – “I think therefore I mutter,” – thank you

  4. Chris Hall says:

    Oh dear, a doctor. Not a good place to go…

  5. Delightful peak behind the curtain of a moment in the day of, Six.
    “the man’s ‘Out-loud thinking’ button.” Don’t we all have one? lol

  6. messymimi says:

    I’m going to have to memorize that Latun phrase. I also like “vehicular preistalsis.” We are plagued with it here.

  7. Liz H-H says:

    Sounds like a winning partnership to me! 😄