TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution, participation and assay into the virtual world of grat blogs. Foundered by L. Rogers (distant niece, twice behooved, of Jack Rogers, who in turn is mis-remembered as the bad-seed brother Mister R). The Ten Things of Thankful is the original Bloghop that Refuses to Die! And it’s both fun and beneficial to bloggers and Readers and, the occasional spouses of them.

1) Una

2) Phyllis

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) editing and updating the static pages of the Wakefield Doctrine website! One page (About) five or six left!

5) the Six Sentence Story the place for reading (and writing) flash fiction

6) Two G+Girlie Tomorrow. Sunday at 2:30 ET come on by!

7) something, something

8) Less than 1 week ’til Summer! Come on! veinal equinox!

9) This Just In!!

So, we were all watching our favorite morning show, ‘LetsDig18’ and our rogerian host, Chris, made a statement without promoting, prompting or otherwise receiving direction from us. And we literally jumped up from the couch and got right over here. What we experienced:  a new rogerian expression!**  “…this pond is astronomically deep

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

* Saturday morning 8:04 am on the youtube

** a characteristic behavior peculiar to rogers startlingly funny a brief explanation and examples can be found at the bottom of the page on rogers.

 

vids (no. do. not. ask. We have no idea as any reasonable or rational ‘Why’ to this week’s vids)

*

*

*

*

*

 

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. messymimi says:

    Great music is great music, perhaps you file not making it “fit the theme” or “have a rationale behind them” this time under Emerson. (A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.)

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      agreed
      not only can the ‘links’ and associations between songs be subtle, but also fleeting (a glimpse of a world not permanent or persistent