Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Started to feel a little guilty about not writing a totally-new post.

Almost immediately, the thought, like a scott in a junior high school cafeteria*, followed, “Come on, if’n we were in a class and the professor said, “Today we begin our study of ‘Romeo and Juliet’ so get out your Lindys** and write:

Two households, both alike in dignity, / In fair Verona, where we lay our scene, / From ancient grudge break to new mutiny, / Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean.”

(Oh No! He dih’int!***)

To assuage my guilt a little, allow us to take up an insight contained in Phyllis’s comment to yesterday’s post:

I think one of the best parts of being a Roger is the ability for time to have no meaning: “..As it was in the beginning, is now and ever will be, world without end amen.”

This insight into the reality of the Herd Member is quite provocative, as the Doctrine reminds us that each of the three predominant worldviews constitutes fundamentally different realities. Heck, we’ll go a step further and say: The fabric of reality is woven from different thread for clarks, scotts and rogers. Perhaps simplest to say: clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel. The reality(s) of the mind, the world of the body and the life of the heart.

We’ll close this Original Content¹ with an assertion that emotion is hypo-chronologic.

Damn! There is a good reason for reprints!

All in favor of a post from 2014, elevate them appendageses….

Hey… the comments to this post were awfully interesting, so this link should take you back to the original, and the comment thread.

(sure, there’s a connection… but it’s really kinda…totally obscure, even for the Doctrine)

Today will we repeat what is implied throughout the Wakefield Doctrine: there are three worldviews that we are all heir to, that we all find ourselves growing up and developing in from a rather young age: the world of the Outsider (clarks), the reality of the Predator (scotts) and the life of the Herd Member (rogers). Each of these three have qualities that good and admirable and each of these three have weaknesses and indulgences that are not so good and admirable. None of the three is better than the other two. Observant Readers will detect a (slightly) overlapping symmetry to the three worldviews, that when balanced would result in an healthy and life-optimising person. (yes, that is a made up word). But that’s not important now, what is important is that we make sure all our new Readers understand that, rogers are not the ‘god-I-hope-I-don’t-turn-out-to-be-one-of-them’ personality types of this here Doctrine, here.

So to review:

rogers (adv rogerian; pronunciation: ‘roe -jeer -riann’)

The ‘initial metaphor’ for a roger is that of any animal that naturally associates with it’s own kind in a ‘herd’. The primary characteristic derived from this metaphor is one of ‘belonging’, being a group member, similar in all important aspects to the others in the group (herd). ( In contrast to the clark personality type, a roger, especially when in the context of the herd,  is never, ever an Outsider.)

The predominant characteristic that is attributed to the rogerian personality type is that rogers experience the world as an ordered place, the nature of the world, (to a roger), is that it is quantifiable, definable and predictable.  To a roger the world is, basically good  and it is a place of Rules…provided, of course,  the rules and guides and laws are recognized, expressed and followed.
This perception is paired with a drive (within the personality type)  to impose order, through rules and laws on the world.

While clarks ‘gather by themselves’ and  scotts organize ‘as a pack’, the characteristic grouping of rogers is the herd.

• rogers are the friendly ones, of the three personality types, the person you will mostly likely recall having a long, pleasant, you-know=I=can’t-really-waht-we-talked-about, conversation with
• rogers are the warp ( or maybe the woof! lol) to whatever social fabric you might care to consider, be it civic, religious, scientific or other cultural expression
• rogers require rules and traditions, they are, in fact, the only ‘reason’ that  human civilization has any continuity whatsoever
• rogers are behind the creation and perpetuation of, virtually all human institutions, religious, civic, political
• rogers do not create, they maintain, they assemble, they are the machine operators
• rogers are the engineers, accountants and physicians
• rogers are the judges, the firefighters and high school teachers (except for gym teachers)

(from: the Page on rogers)

And so, there you have it, rogers in all their hail-fellow/gal-well-met, bonhomme, ladies and gentleman! may I present:  the people person, Mr Precision, the pain in the ass, the woman who’s dinner table looks like a page from a gourmet magazine (and is equally tasty and enjoyable), the man who carves ships and manages to put them in a damn bottle (without anyone even hinting at a necessity to do so), the Mom who makes sure that her Child and those other children all wear the latest in Elementary School Fashion (provided the elementary school is in Calgary and the year is 1957), the father who promises to teach his son to work on cars but forbids him (the son, not himself…he has other things he forbids himself, much to the dismay of the Mrs.), to even touch the tools that are totally clean and (some) hanging on the pegboard over the spotless workbench, matching perfectly to the silhouette outline, the girl elected Chairperson of the Yearbook Committee two years in a row!, the linebacker, the catcher, the girl who will become an engineer because it is such a stable and reliable line of work, the friend you had that was your best friend up until a scott enters the scene and then, depending upon gender (of the scott, not the friend) you would end up: beat up and ignored or ignored and beat up!  rogers represent the majority of the population and we would not have the user-friendly and increasingly impersonal conveniences of life without them.

lets try this:

• Court Room:  the Judge is a roger, the Clerk is a clark, the Bailiff is a scott (the Prosecuting Attorney is a roger and the Defense Attorney is a: clark if mostly unsuccessful or a scott is often successful(when not being barred from the courtroom)
• Operating Room: the Surgeon is a scott, the Nurse is a clark and the Anesthesiologist is a roger
• Construction Site: GC (general contractor) is a scott, the finish carpenter is a roger and the guy who does the cleanup is a clark
• Local gas station/repair: the Owner is a scott, the mechanic is a roger and the kid who keeps trying, unsuccessfully to get a job there is a clark
• the Best Date ever, before the age of 23, she is a scott and you are not, the Worst Date ever she is a roger, and you are not
• the King and Queen of the Prom: (Junior Year: she is a roger and he is a sc0tt   Senior Year: she is a scott and he is a scott)
• ….hey! I’m doing all the work here… you want more examples?  write a damn Comment and request or better yet, give us one that we don’t have yet

That’s enough for today.

You know Musicians right? the ones that are exceptionally skilled at their (respective) instruments… that’s right! rogers!

* in a line at lunch, the one who, in the process of cutting to the head of the line, elicits laughter from most of the kids he bypasses and, even, the women with the hairnets on the other side of the counter, thats your scott. no malice, just in a hurry

** the pen of choice of nuns everywhere… but, of course, we’re referencing high school, so better make that a Bic

*** well, actually we did kinda compare ourselfs to Mr ‘speare…lol

1) lol… yes, I do have a tertiary rogerian aspect