Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
So, I was going through old video posts and I came across one that I actually enjoyed listening to. No, really! And I thought, ‘hey if I were into the podcast thing, this would totally be there.’
Well, here it is. I trust the blog can support the file size, we’ll find out. It is eleven minutes or so long. (One thing, the sound volume is a but un-even, but it immediately comes back. Besides, I’m a clark and you’re probably used to that… uneven sound quality, aka mumbling.)
* I don’t know! They, everyone… most people…you know…rogers!
(From Phyllis)
Scotts are definitive:
Rogers are inclusive:
Clarks give all available information (some of which is regarding the question).
Very nice post.
Do Scotts get easily offended that other people have different opinions? Is that part of conquest, to make everyone think the same way you do? If so, that would explain a lot about a person i know.
Good question about scotts.
I think I better do a post.
…tomorrow
lol
I have to say that in all my learning, “referential authority” was huge. It clarified/explained so much. I would posit it is a cornerstone of the rogerian worldview.
Enjoyed the vid. A good reminder to my self – to remember how a thing manifests in my worldview is not how it manifests in the other two world views.
That picture of Giada – never mind her eyes..who cannot see by those teeth she is a scott, lol
lol
I love to when the ‘real’ world imitates the virtual world… talk about role models for clarks, scotts and rogers!