Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
Grateful for:
1) Books that connected within the child that I was at time in life that I read them:
- Tom Swift Jr
- Bullfinch’s Mythology
- Stranger in a Strange Land
- the Teachings of don Juan (a Yaqui Way of Knowledge)
5) Records that connected me to a world that I really thought was out there:
- Wagner’s Ride of the Valkyries
- Herb Alpert ‘A Taste of Honey’*
- Led Zeppelin ‘Led Zeppelin’
- Jimi Hendrix Experience ‘Are you Experienced?’
10) People that connected with me…at a point in my life that, I did not have a prayer in the world of appreciating the long-term effects of my interactions with them:
- Nancy Jackson
- Sister Mary Imelda
- Miss Hiester
- Coach Collins
3) Situations (that we all encounter) the effects and repercussions are still felt:
- Swimming Lessons at age 10
- Stuck in a car in a snowstorm on the Bourne Bridge
- The boy in the orange sweater
- Tufts Small Animal Hospital
2) this has been one of those TToTs that cause me to push back from the keyboard and say, ‘no frickin way! don’t even think about hitting publish.’
4) lol…. (oh, yes I did!)
6) this Post today does, in fact, serve as an illustration of one of the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine i.e. ‘manifesting’. We all have similar experiences as we live life; you buy gas at the 7/11, you study really hard for SATs, you get turned down by the girl of your dreams, you feel amazed at the person that your husband as learned to become, your child makes you wonder how you managed to be so fortunate….all the countless parts of a day-in-a-life. However, there are three personality types (in the Wakefield Doctrine) and there is no dividing up/off all these events and feelings, hopes and a-damn-good-job-for-a-guy-like-you, we all experience all of them. It’s how they ‘manifest’ for us, as individuals, that tells us the character of our worldview.
7) (New Readers?) 3 worldviews of the Doctrine:
- the world of the Outsider (clarks) in which the world is out there and we are here left to figure it all out, not really introverts as much as people who are trying to ‘pass as real people’…. funny thing about clarks, ‘we do not seek the spotlight, but we do not tolerate being ignored’
- the life of the Predator (scotts) the world is here, not next Tuesday and not ‘because she said she never wanted to see me again, I can’t go on‘, scotts act quickly and decisively and often correctly, they are mercurial in temperament, yet totally social. At a party the scottian man or woman will ‘work the room’ (or if they want a rest) they will be entertaining the people gathered around them
- the reality of the Herd Member (rogers) the term Herd is sometimes read as being a mindless drone… nothing could be further from the truth…rogers are independent, action oriented, emotional….members of the Herd. rogers wake up every morning with a-certainty-that-does-not-allow-or-require-or-stimulate-a-question that there is a Right way to do things and that is their primary mission, to carry on whatever tradition of correct action shapes their individual lives. They are social the way that books in a library could be said to be social, i.e. there is a connection between and among them all, not necessarily one book on shelf A (2nd Floor Antiquities Collection) and Shelf E2 (Auto Mechanics for the Hobbyist)
8) Man… you know how on some Posts you write and you write and you enjoy it and all…. (then) you stop and you think, ‘damn! gots to be 2000 words better stop here‘ I did and looked and said, “600 words here?!!”
9) If I wasn’t sincere in my efforts to write about things I am grateful for, I wouldn’t stop at Number 9….
10) 1.3 y’all …. (despite or maybe because of the très weird Post and all…lol)
Join the Ten Things of Thankful Facebook Group
Ah, yes. The clarkscottrogers personality quotient is further explained. And I might add, probably more clear than ever before. Is that because of the way it is written, or the way it is perceived?
…I am inclined to go with ‘the way it is perceived’ (in part because we always say, ‘the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them’ which is meant to imply that we can only be responsible for our own actions/understanding/reactions and emotions.) or maybe I just got closer to my goal i.e. ‘write a single post that when read by anyone of interest, the Wakefield Doctrine will be understood and useable …immediately
I commented yesterday on what I thought was your post for this weekend. I’m slowly loosing my mind I think. I probably read the one yesterday last week when you originally posted it. Take a deep breath Sue and count to ten and start again :)
why thank you! (for implying that you are losing your mind)…as I seem to be the one that has found it necessary (at least for the month of September) to write a Post every single day, ayiiee!
To use the phraseology of a well-known (yet somehow he may say Lesser-known) clark… serious blog envy yáll…Y’know?
I reeeeealy like this one!
lol…the things our fingers can do when not properly supervised!
so how is this working out for you… yknow…this daily post thing?
funny you should ask! just publishing today’s Post…
But if I look WITHIN the list there seem to be a hundredandeleventybillion more. Are you going to write about the boy with the orange sweater?
Lizzi
yeah… (to your first thought), these lists today was sort of stimulated by that ‘book list’ thing that was making the rounds on the Fbook a week or two ago. As I started to do it (then) I found that I enjoyed the remembered books from different stages of life (if that makes any sense)… so it’s sort of like sifting through the mind’s past memories maybe not my favorites or the best….just the ones that are still there…for whatever reason
the boy in the orange sweater… yeah significant traumatic childhood event (in my mind are a responded to a situation that manifested my Outsider status)…. wrote about it at some point in the last 3 or 4 years, will try to find it and re-print it in these comments… I really, really need to get better at tagging or sorting or whatever it is that I can do to be able to find, say the post with this particular story in it…. guess I’ll just have to start re-reading old Posts…. (yes, I suppose I could just re-tell it… that might be more interesting in relation to what you and I were talking about this Friday…. I wrote the story at least a year (or more) ago….would I tell it the same today as I did then? if not would the difference be significant and would it indicate a change being effected by this here Doctrine here?
I think write it again. And I use Google to search old posts, if I forget I’ve got a search box installed on my blog.
Sounds fascinating.
And the book list thing was a good inspiration to draw on :)
You know how some books have you wanting to know more about two paragraphs in? This list did that for me. What a great way to provoke thought—the listing of experiences, books and people who have changed who you are. Wow. Your list clearly has many a story behind it.. stories which I hope to hear one day. And then there is the lingering thought of what titles, names and experiences would populate my own list. I love this! Love it as only a Clark trying to pass as a real person could love it!
lol
yeah… it’s kinda the fun (clarklike way of participating in what otherwise is a rogerian exercise)… hey! holy shit! I think you’ve saved me this early monday morning!
11, right? (says the roger)
Led Zeppelin. Spent many hours listening to them in high school.
So much good in here, Clark – lots of intriguing tidbits making us want to know more…like the kid in the orange sweater and Sister Mary Imelda. The books and music are fascinating. The Bulfinch made me look critically at my personal library and wonder why the hell I don’t have a copy of that in there? I have my Hamilton Mythology, but that one is not present. So wrong. Needs to be corrected.
Anyway, today I have no doubt I should vote Roger.