Introduction   (damn!, Jimmy said this thing came ready to fill-in)  The purpose of this Report is to review and critique the book: the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) (ok, ok  that’s a start, stay calm, not due for another hour…)

This part of High School book reports presents the most general information on the book: (no shit, sherlock you better believe it is ‘most general’ lol) This book was a very interesting Introduction to a very Interesting Theory of Personality( where is Janie!! she said she would help me with, “don’t worry Britney, we can knock this off in a half hour”,  yeah right) The book explains a very unique and productive way to understand those around us. (they better not read the book, damn that from the cover…)

• Title/Author; The Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) clarkscottroger
• Publication information; a weblog hosted by bluehost; https://wakefielddoctrine.com
• Genre; Crazy Shit (lol) Theories of Personality ( yeah, sure thing that’s surely what it is…)
• 1-2 sentences-long Introduction to your book report. (aww come on, I’ve already written that many… ) This is an un-conventional theory of personality that is based on how a person experiences the world instead of the way that they act most of the time. ( ok, ok don’t use it all up…) This book says that by understanding the way a person sees the world what they do will not be a surprise. This is a very good theory.

• What is the book about? The book is about the Wakefield Doctrine. (hey all they asked was what it is about…I’m not writing a book you know…)
• What do you think about the book? (no, I am not going to write that…I need the grade …no let me think…) I thought that this book was a very thoughtful  insightful book about a very interesting subject.

• Is the writing effective, powerful, difficult, or beautiful? The writing is very effective and is not too difficult.  It explains the Wakefield Doctrine in words that most people can understand and benefit from. (yes I can end on ‘from’  stop distracting me… )
• What are the strong and weak points of the book? The strongest thing about this book is the examples the Author gives for the three different personality types.  Each of the three (clarks, scotts and rogers) are clear and easy to see in the everyday world.  The weak points is when the writer uses various literary constructs to advance his theory (…Janie did…this text…she said she will have to meet us at class…shit)
• Did its author achieve his/her purpose? Yes he/she/they did. (…I don’t care anymore…I just want to have something to hand in… )
• Do you agree with the author’s point of view? Why? I agree with the Authors point of view because it seems to be true.  If you look aorund you with the three types of people in mind you will see one right away.  Usually it is a scott or a roger. Once you see one you will see the others.  The hard part is seeing which of the three (clarks, scotts or rogers) you are because the Author says you are all three but you are mostly one of the three (…and the other can be reached at the crazy old people home…lol stop it Jimmy…)
• What is your impression from the book? Is it interesting, moving, or boring? This is a very interesting and moving book and I would recommend it to everyone.
• Your recommendations. I recommend that you do not go out on a SUnda y night. I recommend that everyone read the book, the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) because it lets you see how people will act and will let you not be fooled by how they act especially if you are a clark.

Pull your thoughts together and make a brief conclusion. (hey Janie…thanks so much for your help…. ) (…yeah he was a little help…very funny Jimmy…do you think your Janitor friend would get me a video real quick? …first period!! I told you on the phone…no,  no problem…maybe not a A but I am not the over-acheiver her, am I…lol  )