Monday Morning the Wakefield Doctrine (“hey! it’s an experiment…and just like in those ‘B’ movies, I’m experimenting on myself”) | the Wakefield Doctrine Monday Morning the Wakefield Doctrine (“hey! it’s an experiment…and just like in those ‘B’ movies, I’m experimenting on myself”) | the Wakefield Doctrine

Monday Morning the Wakefield Doctrine (“hey! it’s an experiment…and just like in those ‘B’ movies, I’m experimenting on myself”)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

we all remember this from our undergrad 'Abnormal Psych' class, right?

we all remember this from our undergrad ‘Abnormal Psych’ class, right?

Lets try a little experiment this morning. Two things first:

  1. It’s been established (or, at very least, admitted to) here that, once I’ve engaged in the normal everyday demands of work and family and such, the supply of post-worthy words dries up faster than a 67 year old’s honeymoon
  2. the Wakefield Doctrine is about learning about myself (as much as it is about seeing into the thoughts of you and the other people in my world1)

So here’s what we’ll do: I’ll write a couple of hundred words about the value and use of the Wakefield Doctrine on a typical Monday morning. I’ll stop writing, take a quick shower, get dressed and start my work day2. After an hour or so of work, I’ll come back here and ‘re-write’ this post. Let’s see if this ‘oh-my-god-can’t-you-see-how-incredibly-useful-and-fun’ theory of personality accounts for any change in my day.3

(Here we go)

the Wakefield Doctrine is a perspective on the nature of the world (and the people and things and events that make it up). Properly applied, the Wakefield Doctrine allows me to know more about ‘the other person’, than I have any right to know.  With the Wakefield Doctrine, I am way, way less likely to find myself saying, “Now why in the world would they say/do such a thing?! I really thought I knew them better than that!”
As to how I go about ‘knowing more about you than you know about yourself’? All I need do is observe and (correctly) infer how you are relating yourself to the world around you. Are you acting like an Outsider? Do you sound like you are experiencing the situation as would a Predator or are you simply comfortable with the situation, as comfortable as a Member of the Herd? Once I know that (about) you, I can anticipate not only how you will react to a situation or interaction, I can get a glimpse of the world as you are experiencing it. This last is the most challenging aspect of the Wakefield Doctrine. Knowing that the other person (may) be perceiving the world differently than I am, even though we are both in the same room, hell! there’s no one here in the break room except you and me and all we’re doing is talking about the job we both have (the same job) and yet….somehow, you are reacting to it in a way that is totally at odds with the way that I would!  that is the power of the Wakefield Doctrine

…oh yeah, the other part? If I want to… I can see parts of myself in a new light. This is not always such fun, but I can if I choose. The thing that this Wakefield Doctrine says to us is, ‘hey, you’re experiencing the world as (a clark or a scott or a roger)…. you have the right and the capability to see the world, experience the world as do ‘the other two personality types’…so don’t worry about:

  • not understanding (hey clark!! 2/3s of life is not about understanding or knowing or figuring out shit!  but don’t let your brain trick you… you got this!)
  • not being ready (scott! yo… sure you’re always quick ….you’re even as smart as all them, don’t give it a second thought, what they seem to think they know that you don’t know?  doesn’t matter…’cause you do!
  • nope, they’re not talking about you, roger… and even if there are moments when you think you can’t continue your efforts, that everyone has turned away, it’s not true.  don’t give it a second thought

…alright. that’s what I have while I am still in ‘simple clark‘ mode.

stop back later this morning and lets see how it looks after I’ve had to engage in the ‘real’ world for a couple of fun-filled hours!

 

 

1) ok, it’s still about that, but I’m trying to establish my premise, so cut me some slack, ok?

2) meaning, I’ll check my email, do a couple of things, go to the office, check a couple of things and then come back to this Post…oh, probably around 9:55 am

3)  no, I do believe you are that trusting!  lol…. as a matter of fact, no I don’t think of what I’m writing as the product of a writer, telling whatever story I choose… I actually think of this as a record of my experiences, somehow converted to public display mode

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Dyanne says:

    FRIST! HAH! Beat Zoe!

  2. zoebyrd says:

    I know you will think me facetious but I do not know that cat thing… Im off to look it up

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      Back in the day…. (no! wait come back!! it’s just a youth-challenged person reminiscing) I switched my major in 1970 (from History to Psych)…and there was much activity and upheaval in the textbook industry (“Hey!! these modern kids don’t want to just read words!!! They what a multi-media experience!!” The leading ‘offender’ was CRM Books (publishers of textbooks for the modern student… think TimeLife does college) big format glossy covers and lots and lots of illustrations…including the aforementioned cat… which at the time was used to illustrate the declining mental health of the artist… (as opposed to be a number of different artists, as the reference I found stated)….anyway that was CRM’s approach to presenting Abnormal Psych)

      now you might be thinking, ‘well, photos and glossy covers are not, in and of themselves bad things, are they clark? shouldn’t you lighten up on those CRM folks?”

      well, I would agree….except for ‘the Lady’

  3. zoebyrd says:
    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      that is so not ‘the Lady’ will try to explain in a follow-up comment.

      • zoebyrd says:

        yeah, I figured but I just wanted to scare ya a little…. but when you have time, do ‘splain, Lucy.

        • zoebyrd says:

          SOOOOOOO…. who’s the lady?

          • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

            …I’ll give a better description when I call you on the phone next…lets just say that, in terms of ethics and textbook writing, this was barely a step above Little Albert and the damn rabbit (Watson and them).
            Anyway… the CRM Abnormal Psych textbook, they had these square, flexible plastic records in the back of the book that were audio recording of therapy sessions. ‘the Lady’ is the term we applied (with genuine affection, over the course of years) to one session involving a woman (reported in the Liner Notes) as a paranoid schizophrenic in an excited state. Complete with what could only have been a Grad student duped into provoking this poor woman.
            …hey, it was the 70’s

            • zoebyrd says:

              so I dont know what is more sad… the situation you describe or the fact that I totally remember those little square records. lol

  4. lrconsiderer says:

    Did you come back?

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      no! (damn!)…. I am supposed to ‘re-write’ this Post from the perspective of ‘my brain on reality’ not doing so well!

      will have something for later
      (although, just between you and me, I am back to feeling like writing a Post (the first of the morning there was no way I had anything to say)…. but, my ‘reasonable side’ says, ‘hey! clark…get back to your paying job’* so I better back to work).

      * of course, as much as I am all over my case to get back to work… someone is still typing! lol
      If I had any sense, I’d fire my ass for insubordination**

      ** one of a clark’s best things!