ok Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine ok Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

ok Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Unicorn Challenge bloghop.

A word-count constrained imagination contest* hosted by jenne and ceayr, the prompt is an image and the only limit is ‘tell your story in under 250 words’

Fair Warning: A bit of a ‘shaggy dog‘ story.

 

I know what you’re thinking.

You’re thinking, ‘Who the hell left a wetsuit our to dry in the middle of where anyone could steal it? Worse, what kind of person would take a photo and bait the writer with an Old Testament fixation and a clear need to make people smile.’

Am I right?

Well, I am and you’re not.

There’s a lesser-known approach to writing fiction that maintains the simple direction: “Write something that will engage the Reader and then, no matter how outlandish the initial premise, (or, if you’re lucky, an inciting incident), write your way out of it.”

Now you’re getting warm. This would be simpler, if not more conventional were the author to adopt the Second Person POV for the narrative. You’d type the scene. You would find a way to break the fourth wall with a sense of good-natured humor, (a resentful Reader will not continue to ‘The End’), and voilà! Story written, story read.

But, now you’re thinking, ‘Where’s the payoff? The reward for engaging in a writer-Reader transaction?

Funny thing about that. The Reader is not drafted, (not counting those conscripted by classroom adjutants handing out writing assignments), the Reader voluntarily pays their money, (usually of the most precious of currencies, Time), and rightfully expects to be: surprised.

So, big finish!

“The three Marys stood before the Spool of Life and heard a young man in a white rob say, “Surfs Up!”

 

*

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Chris Hall says:

    A glorious outcome. And boom, boom.
    Happy Easter!

  2. Ha! Excellent.

  3. Nicely done. Happy Easter!

  4. ceayr says:

    Oh Clark Clark Clark, I’m disappointed in you!
    As if someone as kind and sweet-natured as Jenne would deliberately ‘bait the writer with an Old Testament fixation’.
    But I certainly wish I’d thought of that!
    As for your contribution, I absolutely love the Gospel according to Clark.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      thanks (the old saying “Disappointment is the sincerest form of surprise”) (hey! there you go! the Ultimate party game: “Which figure in the Old/New Testament, if you had to be transported to the Day, could you have successfully assumed the identity of!”

      given how I still have not figured out my blog’s insistence that your co-host is a permanent resident of Coventry… please relay to her that, my line about ‘Old Testament fixation’ is intended to make fun of my own insistence on returning to the original well (for most new writers), i.e. the Garden of Edam (lol)

Leave a Reply