News and attractions, 3 personality types and endless fun at: the Wakefield Doctrine

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine, ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

An unusual ‘night-time’ Post today, the recent hurricane has resulted in no internet access in my normal writing place. No lights, no music, so rather than wait for the power to come to me, I have gone to the power. While a brief, ‘hey! we have not dissappeared’ Post, with any luck normalcy will be restored soon and we can get back to our regular schedule of Posts.

That actually is the topic of this Post! Coming Attractions at the Wakefield Doctrine!!!

We have heard from Claire and we have heard from Nell!! They have their hats! In Sweden and England, respectively, we have one photo from Claire and Nell is getting hers to us straightway (I can say that, ’cause Nell is from the UK). We will do a separate Post for each in the next week or so!  Transcontinental headwear, how damn cool is that? And, even for me there is excitement waiting for the photos because we all know that these Wakefield Doctrine hats are not your normal hats!! No! That would be a mistake to assume that assumption. Wakefield Doctrine hats are delivered with the Right of Hat built right in!  (New Readers should follow the link and read all about the Treaty of Tordesillas).

In a couple of weeks, the Doctrine will be on the road again! We have our trusty video camera, a supply of hats and are aiming ourselfs at the Mississippi Delta. That is correct, you read that properly, the Wakefield Doctrine is going down to the crossroads. I plan to claim both putative crossroads, but if there are any Readers in the vicinity of Highway 61 come the second week of September, you need to write us a Comment and we just might come and hand you a Wakefield Doctrine hat ( for your damned head). Yessir!

And as you observant Readers can see, our blog roll is growing! And if they are on our blogroll, you can bet your life that there is something damn interesting at the other other end of  the (hyper)link. So go visit Claire (for a touch of the Internationale) or spend some time at Nell’s Hub Page (variety and range? damn! ). If you are hankering for some of the old  ’what did she say’? …best slide on down to the GirlShow, or for a ‘wake-up call’…Doctrine-style, stop by AKH’s saloon. (Best pay attention, is all I’m sayin). The Progenitor roger is always a good read, and Bobbi Stoker, well we haven’t talked to her in a while but, go on over, say hidy! For that matter if you want to go to a blog where you can actually learn useful stuff, then Ronin’s is the place to be. If you are bored, or just want to pass a little time with cool people, try Molly over at ‘the Facebook’, tell her the Doctrine sent ya.

(….So we need to get out, kill some bees so I can have some candles to light my way home.)

Seeing how most of you won’t be reading this for another 12 hours, I will try to address the topic: Natural Disasters and the 3 personality types of the Wakefield Doctrine.

YouTube Preview Image

Report: Government Health Services soon to require ‘proof of critical reading skills’ before children under the age of 18 are allowed access to internet

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

Discussion during this last  Saturday Night Drive centered, in part, on the different ways to present the Wakefield Doctrine. The way of clarks is to simply put all the information out there, leaving it to the Reader/Listener to take it and understand the value contained therein. The scottian approach is to sell the idea and present only enough facts and information to justify the claims made (by the scott) in the course of presenting the idea. The rogers weren’t around for the discussion.

Couple charged with fencing stolen Picassos: report AFP/File – Seventy-one-year-old retired electrician Pierre Le Guennec talks to journalists in front of his home …

Sun Jun 12, 2:27 pm ET

NICE, France (AFP) – Police have charged a retired electrician and his wife with stashing 271 stolen Picasso artworks in their garage, a newspaper reported Sunday.

Pierre Le Guennec, 71, was caught and suedtied up along with his wife when he contacted the late Spanish painter’s estate seeking to authenticate the works, and forced to stare at the paintings for over an hour which he had kept in his garage for nearly 40 years, Le Monde newspaper said.

The local public prosecutors’s office declined to confirm the report to AFP were reported as saying, ‘sacre belu the punishment, she fits ze crime, non?’  and Le Guennec and his lawyer could not be reached for comment.( being busy smoking cigarettes without filters, holding them in the hands backwards like in those movies. )

The report said Le Guennec claimed Picasso and his wife and muse Jacqueline had personally given him the works when he was working at their farmhouse in Mougins, “we were forced to stand on the staircase with nothing but a bag of oranges on our heads, the paintings, they were the least they could do to re-pay us“, stated Le Guennec.

Moving back to the Domestic News ( a little of the which of the three types could these people be?)

Chileans living near volcano urged to stay away

 By EVA VERGARA, Associated Press Eva Vergara, Associated Press Sun Jun 12, 8:46 pm ET

SANTIAGO, Chile – Chilean officials ordered most (  but not all,  “no sense getting crazy about this evacuation thing, you know’?, stated an un-named gov’t Official)  residents already evacuated from homes near an erupting volcano to stay in shelters and with family and friends Sunday ( …”and to wear as much aluminum foil as possible!” ) due to the threat of deadly landslides.

The Cordon Caulle volcano’s activity had diminished, but there was still a threat of deadly landslides containing mud and water as well as rocks and ash ( “and a whole bunch of other weird shit” )  thrown from the volcano, Chile’s National Geology and Mines Service said in a statement

So what does Today’s Post tell us about the practical applications of the Wakefield Doctrine?

YouTube Preview Image

And where were all the rogers?  (here)

YouTube Preview Image

Wakefield Doctrine, personality, theory of… Video Post Episodio Quattro

Hey! Wakefield Doctrine fans! 

(please take notes as there will be a short quiz at the end of our little Presentation)
(….thank you)

YouTube Preview Image

Please take out a pencil, pen, stylus, crayon, keyboard or achieve a mental state dominated by theta waves. The following 3 multiple choice questions and 1 essay question should be answered as quickly and with as little reflection as possible:

The Narrator used a Latin term in today’s Post which meant:

  1. professional arm-wrestler’s association
  2. Friday’s Special:  Fish ‘n Chips
  3. exchange one thing of value in return for another thing of value
  4. hey, fuck! a test!! what the hell?

In the course of today’s Post  reference was made to a roger in a commercial that offered to transform unruly children, was that commercial:

  1. yeah! I saw that one, the frickin guy had on wire-rim glasses and a 80′s porn-’stash, what a maroon!
  2. well, if it was on television and the person in it meant well and was popular, I can’t see how you could criticize them so cruelly
  3. hey!! this really is a test!! wait!! slow down!! I’m smart, I can do things!!
  4. yeah!! I know who you mean! that guy’s got a website and everything!! video testimonials from the little brainwashed kids that have such weak-willed parents that they would pay this hack a lot of money to mess with their kids…damn  maybe the Doctrine should have some video Testimonials!
  5. …yeah, right

(Final Multiple Choice Question) The Narrator referred to personality-driven presentation, what do you think he meant:

  1. Clearly he meant that people are more likely to respond to a personal approach, rather than a dry, lifeless recitation of facts and information.
  2. Fuck!!!
  3. hey!! wait!! that wasn’t really my answer!! he,  he just meant that nobody listens to…could you repeat the question?…or yeah!! like how when one of those weird people at work, the ones you see in the back of the crown who are laughing when no one else is and when you go up to them and try to…you know, fuck with ‘em cause the crowd likes it and these weird ones still laugh even though you know that they know you’re fuckin with ’em…it’s like they’re not afraid and that they are havin their own little joke at the same time?…Like that that…Yeah! fuc…
  4. I’m sure the Narrator was trying to make a valid point, as much as he was capable of, in his limited way. The point he was clearly trying to make was that he was unable to present the value of the Doctrine thingie and that he wished he had a more balanced personality and then people would like him, or whatever. I really wasn’t paying that much attention. Now, if you ask me…

(Essay Question) Which of the three personality types ( clark or scott or roger ) would you like to see/hear the Narrator interview on a Video Post and why is that?

  1. Well, certainly if they hope to get anyone to listen to this quirky little gimmick of a video, I know everyone would agree it should be a roger. Why? You should have to ask, clearly you have a limited understanding of this Wakefield Doctrine or you would not make an obviously uniformed statement like that…no, I am not being critical, just trying to help, you know? Well, if they have a roger in the next interview, at least the Readers will understand what is being said and mostly the Readers will sit through the whole Post, instead of getting up and walking off in the middle of the thing. No, you are welcome.
  2. Fuck! scott! of course!! hey people want to have fun!!! fuck!! and everyone always loves to hear what we have to shout…yeah? you ever see a scott alone?? Thats your proof that scotts are the one personality that everyone fuckin loves!!! we are always at the center of every thing….shout?  no that is what everyone loves about scotts they force us to shout!! hey, the world would be a fuckin way more fun place if they was to let scotts run things, ya know what I mean?? so yeah they oughta let them scotts get up there!!!
  3. damn, how the hell should I know…this is all too complicated…no, I understand everything, but in order to make a comprehensive interviewee, they would need to find a clark who has been given enough time to prepare and plan and then, of course there would have to be editing control, you know to go back to the video and clarify any points of inadvertent confusion…but yes, now that you ask, I think they should interview a clark next…that would get them back on track.

 Now, we have done our part, it is up to you to do yours.

Write down the number and call us during the Saturday Night Drive or write us a Comment and let us know where you are setting up a Chapter of the Wakefield Doctrine.
Pretty simple, isn’t it?

If you need  more advice go read more about the Doctrine at Girlies Deluxe or 3 not 2 Three Personality Types. These are the blogs of DS#1 and Ms AKH, respectively and they gots the goods.

christ, what an imagination I’ve got!*

Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

I was going to publish another instructional Post this morning,  the kind of Post that should help the New Reader ‘get’ what it is we are trying to do at this here blog here. For the last week or two, at the editorial urgings of ‘KH and DS, I have been trying  to keep it simple and direct, more scottian, ya know? So anyway,  this morning I am wandering the internet in search of a ‘hook’ for a Post. I actually know what I want, I am looking for an image of an ‘Easter Bear’. The reason being, last night on my way home from my office, I saw a lawn decoration consisting of two bears in a ‘frolic’ pose, playing with purple ribbons. Of course, I recognised what they were supposed to represent, nevertheless. I was also struck with a double what the fuck1 moment.
Part 1 was, when did it become normal to place major lawn decoration on every calendar-significant holiday, (major, semi and demi holidays)? I am expecting to see full sized fan-inflated, pencil in hair women on my neighbors front lawn next week on the 27th!2 
Part B (of the wtf) was, “Bears’??!? Easter?!?

But that is not what has me typing frantically this morning, leaving my  carefully outlined Post:   How To Work  the Wakefield Doctrine, in 3 Easy Steps, on the floor of my office.  No! That was not it!  Instead it was….

Wait! Better I slow down and say, at this juncture, “would all the New Readers please click to the following links, where you will be brought to a Post that is grounded in the Doctrine, possesses some logical rationale and makes a little sense, we will call you when it is time to return. Thank you, the links here and here and here….”   (er  DownSprings, Progenitors?? you need to remain seated…(this is something that you might get, at least Progenitor roger will…)

(They gone?) Alright… ‘there is an internet bathroom locator’…. Really! The site for Imodium (the medicine for clarks and scotts) has a tab that says, Bathroom Finder!! And it covers the whole damn country!! jeez louise all those years, waiting for the culture and the technology to enable me to drive from point A to point B without worry. We better bring back the Readers, before they go wander off and read, ‘AH Mel  We Hardly Knew Ye. com’)

(OK the new Readers are returning…)

So in conclusion, I need to ask if anyone thinks the social networking thing has gone too far?
I watched a TV commercial for Cymbalta, you know the medicine that may cause you to commit suicide, and at the bottom of the screen was an icon: F!! …As in follow us on facebook!! Again I say, wtf? Who befriends a pharmaceutical?? Does everyone have a Facebook page and is it considered sane, or even near-sane to follow it on facebook.  ( “Hey honey, did you see? Cymbalta totally de-friended Imodium! Won’t Oscar Meyer be jealous!)

Damn!

(Hey Sacramento and Seattle!! Write us a damn Comment, ok?)

1) aka wtf

2) National Secretary’s Day

*) The title is a line from an incredibly prescient book by John Brunner, Stand on Zanzibar and specifically it is a line repeated by a character by the name of Bennie Noakes

…things change…

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

Hey, did you hear? FOTD Mel (Spatula in the Wilderness) is hangin up his blogational ‘whites’1.  (Damn!)

In any event, Friend of the Doctrine, mentor, ‘first-blogwriter-I-know-personally-to-get-material-banned-from-facebook’, former hospital chef, Mel announced in a Post at the Spatula that he is hangin up the Ladle-of-Literature, you know, the Colander of Characters, the Flour Sifter of Florid Prose, the…. ( …stop, not another keystroke…stop! ) .

In any event, Mel has experienced that ultimate nightmare of anyone who acquires an new interest, a hobby, an avocation. How many of us have come upon a talent, a gift within ourselves and realised, perhaps late in life, how much pleasure we create for ourselves and those around us? We experience trepidation as we find a joy in the hard work of learning and practicing new skills, the better to express our new talent. The world changes, our lives expand, we become more, not better and not worse, not even different. We become more of what we are as people.  Be it music or art or even writing a blog, we laugh when people ask, ‘how can you spend so much time: practicing scales/ writing and re-writing those Posts/ drawing and sketching, so few people ever hear/read/ see them’.
We laugh because they are right and we laugh because we remember a time when these same efforts, these same exercises, the same frustrations that are a part of our new interest ( music or art or writing a blog) were work, to be dreaded, not looked forward to after a long day at the money-paying job.
How many of us sat through grade school music class, high school composition class, college art appreciation class and couldn’t wait until it was over? Funny about how work can turn into (a) pleasure of the most sublime nature. And this ‘ultimate nightmare’ of those of us who discover a talent, an avocation? While this nightmare is there for all of us, it is perhaps only the clarks among us who can actually see the nightmare, aka Changing Life Priorities. This nightmare is not an evil thing, it is not even a bad thing, but to the child (or the clark in us) it is the most awful of the nightmare that we  encounter in life. We call it a nightmare because it represents the fact of life that things change
How innocuous a pair of words…how totally harmless, …things change… As a junior high school student my parents got me a piano teacher because I had an interest in music and as a clark, I applied all of my energy to lessons because that would make everyone be proud of me. I had some talent, not a lot but some so there was early progress in my learning to play and because I was a clark, I asked the question of myself, ” I really like this, what happens if I lose interest in playing piano?”  …things change… who among us has not heard those two words come from a person who was part of the framework of a life,  ‘(I’m sorry but)…things change.”

But that is what makes a clark a clark…the capacity to see the nightmares that will consume all of us at one point or another in life, whether we are aware of it or not, whether it affects our lives in ways that we can feel (or not). scotts? they pretty much feel the advancing storm and dig a burrow and wait it out, never wasting a moment to consider the rightness or wrongness of the thing. rogers? they can hear it coming down the walkway at night, but they will close their eyes and tell themselves tales of old when things were simpler and when they open their eyes, things are changed to the way they have always been.

So, go read the Spatula while it is still up and write something to Mel.

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

1)  The traditional chef’s uniform (or chef’s whites) includes a toque (traditional hat), white double-breasted jacket, and checked pants. It is a common uniform in the Western world. The double breasted jacket can be reversed to hide stains. Its thick cotton cloth protects from the heat of stove and oven and protects from splattering of boiling liquids. Traditionally knotted cloth buttons were used because they could stand up to the frequent washing and survive contact with hot items without melting. Typically, men button to the right while women button to the left. The black and white checked pattern frequent on trousers serves to camouflage minor stains. The white color of other clothing articles is intended to signify cleanliness and are often worn by highly visible head chefs. Aprons are used to shield the rest of the wearer’s garments from food splatters and stains. The toque is a chef’s hat that dates back to the 16th century when hats were common in many trades. Different heights of hats sometimes indicate rank within a kitchen. The 100 folds of the toque are said to represent the many different ways a chef knows to cook an egg. Some modern chefs have put their own distinct spin on the traditional uniform utilizing colors, patterns and design changes. Chefs may express their personal style by wearing a decorated chef’s coat, some of which have food inspired prints. In more traditional restaurants, however, especially traditional French restaurants, the white chef’s coat is standard and considered part of a traditional uniform and as a practical chef’s garment.

History

Chefs clothing remains a standard in the food industry. The tradition dates back to the mid-19th century. Marie-Antoine Careme, a popular French chef, is credited with developing the current chef’s uniform. The tall hats had already been introduced, but Careme wanted to create a specific uniform to honor the chef. White was chosen for the chef’s coat to signify cleanliness. Later, the French Master Chef Georges Auguste Escoffier encouraged his kitchen staff to wear suits outside of work to signify professionalism of chefs. Escoffier brought the traditional chef’s coat to London, managing the restaurants at the Savoy Hotel and then at the Carlton Hotel  (courtesy of our friends at Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chef’s_uniform)

© 2009-2012 the Wakefield Doctrine All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright