..(BONUS).personality types, (INSERT) insights into behavior (TODAY)and a little backstory (ONLY!)for good measure! the Wakefield Doctrine

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers ).

In a recent Video Friday Interview, when asked what changes or additions might improve the blog, Claire Peek suggested  providing insight into the ‘why of the Wakefield Doctrine’. (As Claire put it  ”…A new Reader might find interesting how the Doctrine was born but especially why….”  )

Far be it from us to shy away from a difficult task, in this case it is not so much a matter of the (historical) record of how the Wakefield Doctrine came to be, but rather the personal side of that creation/evolution/development. That is the challenge for today.

Easy part first!  The ‘Eureka Moment of the  Wakefield Doctrine ( nee the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers ):

In the early 1980’s, Scott (the progenitor scott) worked at a music store in Pawtucket. He was the main salesman and also ran the repair department (of the store), this included not only repairing musical instruments and equipment that he sold, but any equipment that might be in need of repair, including various types of tape recorders and other similar equipment.

One day I happened to stop by the store to visit scott while he worked. While there, a customer came into the store, went to the ‘repair department where scott and I were talking and presented to scott what was known as a  ‘duel cassette recorder’  (This device had the capacity to record two cassette cartridges at once and was most often used to copy the contents of one cassette to another cassette, what we would call today, making a back up. Among the controls on this ‘dubbing recorder’ were two of all the normal tape recorder controls: volume, treble and bass. Where it was different from a single cassette recorder was that it had a Master Volume control dial, which, as the name implies controlled the overall sound output of the device.) The recorder that the customer placed on the counter appeared to be new and had no signs of damage or abuse. (As the customer approached the counter, I stepped back and Scott looked up and said, ‘What can we do for you’?   The customer said to  Scott, “this thing is brand new, it worked for a couple of days, then it stopped working entirely, I can’t figure out what is wrong”.

Scott looked at the recorder briefly, without saying a word and then reached under the counter and brought out some (black) electrical tape, and tearing off a 2 inch piece of tape, taped over the Master Volume control (after returning the dial to it’s highest setting). After completing this, scott slid the device back over towards the customer and simply said, “ There, its all right now”

The customer asked to plug in the recorder, took a cassette from his pocket, tried the recorder, ran it through it’s paces; seeing that the broken tape recorder that he brought into the store now worked like new  thanked scott and walked out of the store without another word. A totally satisfied customer.

From my perspective the world shifted. For reasons not clear to this day, I not only saw what scott had seen (the nature of the equipment problem) but I saw that his solution implied a reality, a ‘context’ that was clearly different from the one that I assumed to be the same as everyone experienced.

That is the factual side of the creation of the Wakefield Doctrine. The personal side?

I had plenty of friends. Or more to the fact, I had a close circle of friends that I seemed to have acquired rather deliberately.  Sometimes, when I hear or read about people expressing anxiety about making new friends in a new school or a changed job, I will laugh to myself. I still find (in the fact of) my own comfort that this thing that real people seem to worry about, (i.e.making friends) is really so not difficult while at the same time/all the time, I feel so isolated from people in general. And the irony of this is not wasted on me! I accept now (as I did back then)  that this is just another aspect to the weird world that I inhabit.
In any event, back to the ‘personal side of the creation of the Wakefield Doctrine, I knew back then that I had two things I could count on: having a small circle of friends who ‘got me’ and living with a pervasive, never-ending sense of lacking something…  fitting in, being a part of, knowing what I was supposed to be doing in order to be like everyone else. Call it what you like, it is this certainty that ‘I am different from’ and  because ‘I am missing something’ that defines who I am and once I figure out what (or where) that missing thing is, I will no longer be different from everyone else.
I suspected then, (as I now know for certain) that the thing I needed to understand was right in front of me, but not having a clue as to what it was like, the only thing to do was try to watch everything.
Watching is not exactly synonymous with living, ( lol a joke for the clarks reading this) and so I would settle for watching as I knew that the life that I thought I was in was not really the ‘real life’ that everyone else seemed to be enjoying.
Finally, the moment described above, the scene in the music store. That I would make the leap from what I observed to what I knew, what I concluded (about reality and people) was nothing less than a total frickin gift… if I had a stronger rogerian aspect, I imagine I would go on at length about inspired insight, or serendipity but I do not have that strong a rogerian aspect. If the truth is not obvious, I have a strong (barely restrained) secondary scottian aspect. But that is a whole ‘nother Post.
So as the Lady once said, ‘that’s how it began’.

OK!!  Time to close the Post, unfortunately on  sad note…as I know that most of you already know,  Robert Hegyes passed away late last week. So we will close with the theme song to his, chef-d’œuvre

YouTube Preview Image

 

You looking for the Bonus Inset?  Right this way, yo. This is a clip from a Post written last July, very good explanation of the clark, scott roger thing!  We figured, hey this layout really needs shaking up, so lets do an overlay Title/new Content*

The Wakefield Doctrine has 3 personality type categories: clarksscotts and rogers. You are mostly one (of these 3) but you still have the other 2 in background.
…and when we say personality types? what we mean is, “What kind of world do you walk out to every morning”?  Because this Doctrine is not about your likes and dislikes, favorite colors or foods, interests, hobbies, avocation or inspiration. It is about the nature of your reality.

Yes, you read that right. Reality. Each of the three types of personality in the Wakefield Doctrine experience a different reality. Nothing weird or earth-shakingly different. No crystals or herbs or inner vibrations required either. Just this:

  • clarks exist (in the world) as the perennial outsider. They are normal in every other respect, it’s just that they know that they don’t belong, they are not like other people. But, at the same time clarks are the quiet, creative, funny (except you have to really pay attention or you’ll miss their jokes), self-deprecating, hardworking people that are there all around you all this time;
  • scotts are so in your life (and you will get this description only if you are not a scott) but they are the natural leaders, natural salespeople, natural entertainers… you getting the theme here with this personality type? natural. scotts are the people who live life by the moment without restraint, consideration, forethought, it’s a wonder they live as long as they do
  • rogers (you know who you are, and right now you are denying it) rogers are the everyday, friendly, easy to talk to people that populate every workplace and classroom and corner bar. rogers will be the person you turn to when you have a secret and rogers will be the one you turn to when you want to learn the latest gossip, they are the engineers, the lawyers, the doctors and heart and soul of every PTA and neighborhood watch program in the world.

The Doctrine is different from all the other mainstream and respectable personality and self-improvement systems out there because we insist that it is not just you, it is the world itself that accounts for your life, it’s trials and tribulations, good times, bad times (we know you’ve had your share).
What sets us apart and the reason you should spend time here, is that the Wakefield Doctrine offers everyone a set of tools that is specifically meant for not only your personality type, but (these tools) are meant to work and be useful in the world that you are living in today!

*the ‘extra’ words in the Title today were supposed to look like they were ‘drawn’ over the original Title, you know…graffiti like   whatever

Video Friday… Late Edition… Episode 1 2012 the Wakefield Doctrine live and out loud

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

The Video (of Video Friday) is still in a pre-pre-production status. While we wait, lets talk a little about the fun that you can have with the Wakefield Doctrine.

The Wakefield Doctrine is genuinely fun for people/children/animals and senior citizens of all ages, backgrounds and interests! I know what you are saying, “Well! Those are some mighty Bold Claims, Mr/Ms ‘Whoever-it-is-that-Writes-these-often-amusing-sometimes-tiresome‘ Posts
Well, simply put, ‘I accept your damn challenge!’

Bullet-pointed Ways that the Wakefield Doctrine can give you crazy fun today:

  • figure which of the three personality types you are and try to act like one of the other two*
  • look at the person physically closest to you right now and figure out if they are a clark, scott or roger**
  • stop following these directions and go and read some of the suggested Posts at the bottom of this page
  • allow yourself ‘the right’ to cancel all current New Year’s Resolutions, provided that you write to us and ask for a Wakefield Doctrine hat (for your damn head)
  • take off all your clothes and very quietly-Video is Ready!

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

* lets continue the MS list format thing:

  1. as a scott you will immediately do a poor, over-exagerated caricature and then lose interest;
  2. as a roger you will mull it over and dismiss the whole notion that you could even begin to fit your massive personality into the puny, puny containers of the other two personality types and finally
  3. if you are a clark…you are excited by the idea, but then become careful not to show how much you would enjoy being one of the other two personality types,  ( or …the scott in any event)

** (same with this footnote):

  1. if you are a scott: they are a roger;
  2. if you are a clark…:there is no one that close…(and)
  3. if you are a roger,  the person is a clark, but you will ignore them in favor of the nearest scott

 

the Wakefield Doctrine: Principles and Personalities (is this clear?)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers ).

You know how we said that the New Year ( now the current Year) was going to be a time of organizing the information presented here, so that even the newest of New Readers will totally understand the Doctrine and be able to get a benefit from it, right the hell from the start? Well, this organization thing is tougher than I imagined. The problem is not that we don’t know the Doctrine and how it works and how to use it. The problem/difficulty/challenge lies in the  ’how-to-explain-it-so-that-everyone-and-anyone-gets-it’, aspect of our presentation.
And you know whose fault that is, don’t you?
That’s right! It’s your fault!1  (Just a little editorial levity to offset the dreaded ‘you’re out here in the vast white space of an un-written Post)

Here at the Wakefield Doctrine, the primary writing guidelines have always been to:

  • have a good time
  • write about what I know
  • impart or convey or induce or whatever the hell is required to allow the Reader to come away from this Post glad that they spent the time to read it
So even though this year we have a “mandate”  to be better “organized” so that all our Readers can “understand” that the Wakefield Doctrine is a unique and useful and fun “theory of personality“; after all that, the writing of a useful, informative and entertaining Post has not gotten easier.
New Reader be advised. These Posts are meant more as conversations on the subject of the the Wakefield Doctrine.2

 The Wakefield Doctrine is a way of looking at behavior. Of people. That we know. (…or don’t know).

The Wakefield Doctrine affords us  a perspective on the ‘why’ of a person’s behavior, a feature that is missing in most of the mainstream personality theories. The reason this insight is possible is found within the core tenet of the Doctrine, which is as follows:

All people are born with a predilection to perceive reality as three distinct, characteristic (yet related) worlds. These worlds have rules and assumptions and understandings just like you would expect. What the Doctrine says is that you can live in any of these three worlds but for reasons not yet understood, we settle on one (of these worlds) by age of 5 or 6 and this becomes our worldview. We become clarks or scotts or rogers. We say this because we see behavior as being reasonable reactions and responses to life, provided we understand the reality the person is reacting to. A clark is a clark because they exist in a world in which they are the outsider, a scott behaves like he/she does because they are living their life in a world based on the predator/prey model and  a person who we call a roger is sociable and intelligent and petty and ‘precisely inventive’ because they have (chosen) to live in a world as constructed using the underlying assumptions of the herd mentality.

This might seem confusing at first. I’m sort of explaining it backwards. The way the Doctrine came to be was a result of serendipitous observation of a friend 3 and the inspired insight that his behavior, characteristic responses ( in other words, his personality) made more sense if the worldview that he was seeing was somehow different from mine. For those of us here at the Wakefield Doctrine, all behavior is easily understood provided you can see the world through the (other) person’s eyes. The description of the three personality types will help make the leap to the idea of the three world views. It sounds more difficult than it actually is. Oh yeah! One important detail:  all of us have the capability to experience the world as the other two do. I am a clark, but I have within a rogerian (and) a scottian aspect. When you start learning about the Wakefield Doctrine, you will find yourself saying, “What the hell! Most of the time I am sure I must be a clark but then I see what is clearly a rogerian response.”  All perfectly normal, it is proof in a sense that we retain the view of the world that ‘the other two’ personality types maintain. Just keep exploring and learning the characteristics of each of the three types, the one that you are will be the one that keeps popping back up.

So lets consider this the core premise of the Wakefield Doctrine. The world you are acting in is based on rules and assumptions that shape your options (in behavior, reactions, as we said above about scott, you response to the world comprises your personality type).
Remember that this is a reality of predominance, the world that you exist in as a clark or a scott or a roger is what it is because of a pre-dominance. You never lose the capacity to see the other two worlds. (In fact, it is critical that you never forget that, because that is where we will find the most productive, useful and all-around cool uses of the this thing of ours, in terms of self-development and change and such.)

Good start on the Year. Lets all give ourselves a pat on our respective backs for a good session (…I said, pat,  scott….pat! ) lol

We’ll do some more later in the week.

Guest Call out for this week’s Video Friday!!  Anyone want to come ‘on the air’ let us know.  It’s fun!  Ask anyone who has done it! ( Such as Molly or Ms. AKH or DS#1 or even the progenitor roger!) As a matter of fact, if you go there and ask them (at their blogs) for a Wakefield Doctrine hat (for your damn head) we damn well will send you one!

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

1) Superscript Lesson Number 1: when it comes to being inclined to want to assign blame for problems and difficulties, you are always safe going with  a roger

2)  the ‘we’  around here consists of a number of exceptional people referred to by various titles, Progenitors, DownSprings and Friends of the Doctrine (FOTD) and they are all people like you (New Reader). They came into contact with the Wakefield Doctrine and they found it: interesting, amusing, useful, fuckin incredibly insightful and fun and they have stayed on and contribute to the body of knowledge that we now have.

3) here read this  actually when you get there,go right to the bottom of the Page, that is the story of the first encounter with a Progenitor

Video Friday! Saturday Edition, 2011 in review the Wakefield Doctrine, (next stop the Future!)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers ).

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

Wasn’t that informative? Well, it is year end and while there are a lot of things coming up in the New Year, lets not squander any potentially good Post topics.

The Wakefield Doctrine is a way of understanding the personalities and personality types. It is a view on behavior that will allow you to know more about the other person than they know about themselves. With an understanding of the Wakefield Doctrine, you need never again be in a position of frustration or aggravation, asking yourself, “Now why on earth would they go and do something like that? I really thought I knew them better!?

Let us know if you have any questions.

Video Friday epiglottis 27! self-examination via the Wakefield Doctrine

Whoa…! 1  Today is the sixth day of the week (nearly the Sabbath and you know what that means!2 )

YouTube Preview Image

In any event, we have a special treat for today’s Video Friday! None other than the Progenitor roger!  This is noteworthy as we have not heard much, of late, from the rogerian element! And this, despite the fact that we spent most of last week talking about those crowd-gathering, slider-rule-carrying, 10-Commandments-throwing, civil war3re-enactin, library-card-carrying, Emily-Posting, Facebook-inventing, Barbara Billingsly-apron-wearin’, bunch of gossip-monkeys in nearly every Post!   
But since  ‘letting bygones be bygones’  is the adaptive-enabling strategy employed by most clarks when dealing with (most) rogers, we will not make an issue of it.

Good and useful and entertaining conversation with the Progenitor. Enjoy. Write Comments. Call us.

YouTube Preview Image

1) did you realise that the expression ‘whoa’ is damn-near universal?? really! look it up for yourself, if you don’t believe me…nearly every damn language, not counting the ones that use bar codes symbols for an alphabet, of course

2) well, according to Wikipedia* it means that there are 39 proscribed activities! Including, but not limited to:

  • baking bread
  • making clothes
  • writing ( !!?!)
  • building a house

3) civil war…what the fuck is that? in contrast to an un-civil war? gimme a break

* if it is in Wikipedia, then it’s got to be true!

© 2009-2012 the Wakefield Doctrine All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright