three ways to have a better week, this week

Welcome! It is ‘comic sans’ day again, here at the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers ) and we all know what that means!

That is Correct! It means that today, with this here Post here we will be all about providing useful, low-stress, high-value Advice, intriguing photos and a music video or two. So read along and see if you don’t feel better today for reading about clarks, scotts and rogers. (Hey, is it just me or has the world gotten a little extra annoying in the last three days or so? Nothing too obvious, just a few more people driving 60 mph in the high-speed lane, maybe a Customer Service Person having a bit more attitude than usual, even your computer/smartphone or what have you acting up. Just recently. Let us know if you are experiencing the same increase in aggravation this week.)

But now on to our relaxing, comic sans-enhanced Post.  (btw: this is being done ‘on the fly’ so anyone want to add to the Content, let us know and we will re-write this Post to incorporate your thoughts, reflections and whatnot). Think about it! An easy way to see your thoughts ‘in print’ so effortless even DownSpring glenn could do it!

As promised, the Three Ways to have a Better Week:

One.  Stop reading or watching the News and the Weather (it’s alright to watch the Sports ‘News’ as long as it is not a story about a delay of game due to natural disaster).

Two. Watch the following film clip.

 

 http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xdutgq

 

Three. What? hey, lighten-up, yo

Historical Note for the second video here, the one by Deep Purple: You know that great movie, “This is Spinal Tap’? it was  a documentary.  In the ‘Lazy’ video, watch for the band members wandering around the stage, drinking beer and seemingly just setting up their equipment on the stage that appears to be in a hockey rink…

First some musci we have used before:

YouTube Preview Image

YouTube Preview Image

 

 

one, two, three, four. Can I have a little more?

YouTube Preview Image 

Wakefield Doctrine Here. The theory is called: clarks, scotts and rogers. It will help you. It will set you free.

YouTube Preview Image

(better now, all of out the system now.  such a drive to Wakefield we had!)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers).

Feliz Año Nuevo, las perras! Trust all are well out there, good annual festivities, but even New Years has(have?) to end and we have so much work to do!  Let’s get right to it!

This being Sunday (that) makes yesterday Saturday which, as we all know means a trip to Wakefield. For those of you just joining us, if you would take the time to answer a couple of quick ‘survey type’ question, you can really help us out here as we look for the best and most user-friendly way to present the Wakefield Doctrine. We need to tell all new Readers and Visitors this:
the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) is:

  • a way to look at how people act and how their personality can tell you what they might do
  • there are three personality types: clarks, scotts and rogers
  • these ‘personality types’ are about how the person sees the world, not a list of what they do
  • how a person sees the world tells you everything about their behaving, past, present and future
  • we all are born with the potential to see the world as a clark or a scott or a roger
  • at an early age we settle into one of these (three)
  • we never lose the other two (ways of seeing the world) but we are mostly one type
  • when you start out with this thing of ours, most people say, “hey, I am one type sometimes, but then the other type other times
  • …perfectly normal, that just shows you that tho you might be a scott, you can imagine how the world looks to a clark or a roger
  • the description of the three types is gender and culture neutral…a clark is a clark no matter what country they are in… a scott in a dress…you get the idea
  • when you try the Doctrine out, you will see the rogers out there first, then the scotts then the clarks
  • we have (nearly free) hats for you damn heads…and maybe T shirts

Okies, that is the information we want the First Time Reader to have easily available when they come to this site for the first time. The question we have is:

So, if you don’t mind taking a quick second, really appreciate it.

Last night was Wakefield night. Very excellent drive. Nearly the whole gang be there! (hey Joanne! let us know next Sat night you have time to be on the phone, yo). What? oh, sorry. The thing is this, on Saturday Night glenn and me pile in the car and drive around Wakefield (the real, civic entity not the mental construct) discuss current events centered on the Doctrine; annywaay  the car has a bluetooth capability and the phone has conference calls capacity of 2 lines in and AKH is a short drive to Wakefield…see where this is going?

New Years Day (evening) glenn in backseat, AKH riding shotgun, Progenitor roger and DS#1 in the dashboard…high-fidelity, high-tech, ‘what-hath-god-wrot’ drive through Wakefield. Damn. You should been there. 
Topics covered: screenplay ideas (can’t give away the ideas, ya gonna have to buy a ticket like everyone else), formats for presenting the Doctrine including video tape and (from the Progenitor a very excellent suggestion i.e. cable TV community access program(!) (and for the record…your next question?  Wayne was a roger, Garth a clark…but you had that already, non?), web cams, and finally car seats! Very productive session and we stopped at only one green light and ran (only) one red light. Not bad! Hey, learn your Doctrine and participate and we damn-well gonna invite y’all on the drive.

Is all for now….oh yeah, New Readers?  we do this video thing in these here Posts here…no rhyme or reason  just ’cause.

YouTube Preview Image

…rally round the family…with a pocket full of shells”…

Morning all! Or maybe it is afternoon or evening in your geographic location.  Thought I would give our estimable Progenitor clark the day off.   My offering is a simple gesture.  ”Gesture” perhaps being the operative word.  But save that for another day……words and vids now from yours truly, Downspring#1.   

…”rally round the family with a pocket full of shells”.  Brings a smile to my face just writing those words.  My significant other (SO) and I have enjoyed the music of Rage Against the Machine since their first release.  Bulls on Parade was yet another catchy (if not cathartic) song you just had to listen to loudly.  Anyway, one day while driving our 2 black labs to the park at the intra-coastal, this song came on the radio.  When it was over I made a comment to my SO to the effect that “wasn’t it odd they’re singing about seashells“?  My SO looked at me, smiled and waited.  Then he started to laugh.  “Wha-a-at?” I blondly asked.  He looked me in the eye and said “not those  kind of shells“  at which point I became hysterical with laughter myself.  Then I felt incredulous that I had been listening to this song for how long? without realizing it was referring to gun shells.  HOLY SHIT!  Could not have tried to perceive a thing so far from the reality of the thing if I tried.  (Note: cryptic clarklike sentence).  What the hell happened that my brain would “hear” words and interpret them in such a way?!  Would it make sense to know I have always loved the ocean and have copious amounts of shells in and around my abode from decades of beach walks?  Of course not!! 

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine, the theory of clarks,  scotts and rogers where it is stated and demonstrated that individuals perceive the world in one of three ways.  Mostly.  I won’t repeat the part about where at some point very early in life each of us chooses to perceive the world predominantly through the eyes of a clark, scott or roger.  Where am I going with this?  Perception.  How one perceives the  world, perceives a song or a movie is all about interpretation.  What influences interpretation? Why it is perception.  So, if one had available a simple outline that defined 3 ways in which to view the world then how simple life could be.  Except it is not.

Hey, just got back. Nursing a major cold and needed a brain break. Now with cup of tea in hand I am trying to coalesce my thoughts enough to get back on track, at least next to it.(sure)  Newcomers and or first time readers, this is your chance to start a new year with an absolutely unique and fun way to look at yourself and those around you.  If you can stand there, look in the Wakefield Doctrine mirror and identify yourself as either a clark, scott or roger, I can guarantee you that with a little open mindedness, creativity, gumption and work you can open a world of possibilities.  Huh.  Did I really just say that?  I seemed to have lost my train of thought but then did I not just say I was trying to get back on track?  Until next time.  Better go now as my brain is getting silly.  Hope you enjoy the music.  (Happy Birthday Maurice!)

YouTube Preview Image

 YouTube Preview Image

…hello? what?…. hey! it’s for you

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

We are happy to be seeing quite a few new faces. If you end up finding the Doctrine an interesting site,  in all likelihood you will like it here for one of three reasons:

  1. You never met new information that you didn’t find fascinating to some degree;
  2. There’s some kick-ass music videos and that ALK and this glenn guy they really seem alright
  3. There is a tradition here that goes back at least 35 years, how bad can it be?

First  a ‘cook’s tour’1  of this site: the Wakefield Doctrine maintains that all of us fit into one of three ‘personality types’,  we are all of us, a clark or a scott or a roger. What is unique about this theory is that it does not involve taking a test or filling in a survey form that tries to get you to list your likes and dislikes, hates and loves, favourite colors and pet peeves. No, the Doctrine is way easiest, it simply says, “hey you are either a clark or a scott or a roger!  (But here is where it gets easy!) here in this blog we will show you   how each of the three types ‘look and sound and act’ . Ya find the one that is most like you…bam! now you know your personality type! 
Of course, there is much, much more to it than that, but it is real damn simple to start and most of all,  it’s fun! And not just fun in the ‘omg I am just like Hilary“! (or Justin or whichever cultural icon appeals to you). No frickin way, this is more fun! How can I say that?  Because not only can you and your friends go and look for the rogers and clarks at the mall but  you and your friend can talk about how that new teacher is such a scottian bitch and… you, alone in your room can feel that maybe now you know why people are so mean sometimes.

It’s all here in these Posts and Pages and Comments and such. Again we say welcome, make your self at home and if you have any questions just ask! ( Remember…there are no stupid questions, just your questions).

Very good drive through Wakefield last night. Courtesy of the wonders of modern technology, we had Ms AKH and DS#1 in the car with us for the better part of 47 minutes. Damn this Doctrine-thing ‘shore is gettin interesting.
 What we did was this: glenn and I started out on our usual trip to Wakefield. Being away for three Saturdays, he and I drove the traditional route, including a stop for gas, (unfortunately neither the alien nor the near-transparent-clark-girl were there) and then we drove down through Galilee to not buy ice cream, finally out to the main road (Rt1a aka Ocean Rd). At that point, just north of Scarborough Beach, AKH was called, put on hold, DS#1 was called, un-hold AKH and there we were…Wakefield with 3 DownSprings and a Progenitor! Can I get a damn!

At first the conversation was the slightly over-energized, off-tempo in a  first-time, stage-fright kind of way that you might imagine. But even that was as the Doctrine predicted, i.e. how a clark reacts to stage fright is distinctly different from how a scott would react. But ’nerves’ quickly dissipated and we settled into quite a stimulating discussion. Very interesting.

Topics revolved, for the most part,  around how cool the whole ‘drive to Wakefield’  has very suddenly become. The simple idea that we could have an actual discussion among Progenitors and DownSprings about the Doctrine.  Now the thing about this blogsite here,  is we try to create  a sense of a discussion of the Wakefield Doctrine via the Comments after a Post and everything, but this thing last night was just plain cool.
…damn! it  was real.  With ”actual people” doing what people do when engaged in a challenging and stimulating conversation: contradicting themselves, correcting their last statements, objecting to how their last statement was being interpreted. But in a car. Driving through Wakefield. Discussing the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers.

This will be continued. But before we get out (for now) a couple of the high-points of the conversation:

  • who was sitting in the front and who in the back (don’t even ask!)
  • what was the itinerary and why was I stopping on the green lights and driving through the red
  • how would AKH and glenn get along (never having ‘met’)…
  • something was said about how cool this would have been if we were younger…(I am embarrassed to take responsibility for that)
  • the beginnings of a discussion on gender differences, i.e. how is predatory aggressiveness differently expressed in scottian males v scottian females
  • (decided that that topic should continue in camera, for now and that it would expand to clarks then rogers)
  • brief discussion about the bad rap that scotts might get when new Readers hear the word: predatory
  • finally, glenn (somehow) could hear what we have been trying to say about evolution, that properly approached/defined is not a bad thing
  • this last was the proof of the benefit of these trips to Wakefield
  • decided next time to try and get AKH to come to Wakefield in person so we can get the roger and DS#1  into the dashboard, then watch world collide

Very good Saturday. Will be adding to this Post throughout the day.

Mr. B? Show us what you have been brought, at such great cost to us here to provide our Readers, yo.

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

1. Cook’s tour   n Informal a rapid but extensive tour or survey of anything
                              [after Thomas Cook (1808-92), British travel agent]

(no title) no, really…all I got is (no title)

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2767r

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers).

You know how sometimes these Posts start out with:  “Sorry, don’t have anything prepared, please bear with us….” and how then the Post continues noodling around looking for a point, eventually finding it?
This is one of those Posts, except for the ‘eventually finding it’ part. To demonstrate the sincerity of this the following Post will present all the ‘pre-written, dead-end ideas, rehashed content’ in “block” quotes. All in the interest of full disclosure and total respect of the Reader, yo.

(this first is from frickin Saturday…thats when I still believed it would be a normal Post)

Things that the Doctrine tells us that we know are true, but can’t yet prove it:

  • the percentage of clarklike  females married is significantly lower relative to the scottian females or rogerian women
  • scottian women are insecure on the matter of intellect and scottian guys on the matter of friendships
  • the ’more fortunate’ a roger gets (in life events,  good fortune, success) the more guilty they feel
  • clarks do the best with getting sick and/or otherwise being (temporarily) impaired
  • rogers make the best crippled people
  • scotts are the best handicapped (from birth) people
  • the direct knowledge of the implications and other uses of the Wakefield Doctrine are beyond the capacity of the present authors
  • today’s Post will be among those included in any future retrospective in the Chapter: Odd Posts
  • awareness of the Doctrine among clarks will be the basis for it’s popularity growing
  • scottian women have the highest rate of multiple marriages (relative to the other two) rogerian females, the lowest

 Things that we know about clarks, scotts and rogers that we did not know 12 months ago:

  • rogers have the most accessible (blog) writing style and as such represent the authorship of the blogs that are read by the largest group of blog visitors
  • scotts have limited blog writing skills due to the ‘once removed’ nature of the written word
  • clarks believe that a blog will compensate for ineffectuality in communicating in the real world

So, that got us into Sunday. Still not worried. Sunday is often the time some of the better, more introspective Posts make their appearance.  But Sunday also saw the arrival of full-out whatever-the-hell-kind-of-bug-is-being-shared-at-the-office “cold” symptoms. Fortunately DS#1 was standing by with a partially completed Post…well the start of a line of thought…lets just say a jumping-off point for any clarks who happen to have a scott or a roger tied to a chair in the basement. Yeah! that is best lead in for the next  “little Post That Could!”

(yeah, it took me all this week just to crawl this far. I thought I was a goner)

Always a friendly “welcome” from the Wakefield Doctrine, the theory of clarks, scotts and rogersThis tidbit is a mere Post-ette.  Regular programming will return tomorrow.  Recently, in a clark on clark telephone call (with the progenitor clark), I ruminated aloud a recent interaction with a younger (male) scott at my place of employment wherein the scott (paying customer) spoke to me (cashier), in a bid for reaction, in an exaggerated type of voice/diction. (‘yes, he was acting juvenile but he is a scott after all…”)  I made the transaction with nary a smile and returned his change adding (with nary a smile) “funny man“.  He looked at me with his intense gaze and challenged me by asking “did you just call me funny man?”  I responded “yes, yes I did.”  He left by saying “thank you funny woman.”

WTF is the point of that ditty?  It prompted a conversation about instinctive body response v. cognitive behavior choice.  Was it Live or Memorex?  I had long since identified him as a scott.  Not difficult to do.  In the workplace he is always followed by his co-workers. Literally.  He is also the first to make the joke(s) and yes, often implied/literal inappropriate with the predictable follow-up from his acolytes.  Point 1:  how does one get to the point of instinctively reacting to a scott in such a way that said reaction nullifies the scottian expectation and causes the scott to “react’ instead?  Can you put a scott off guard?  Point 2:  what does it take to re-teach the body/mind, re-shape one’s core response(s) to other people?

Enough…”content”?  What?  shit….

YouTube Preview Image

Hey, when in doubt go with the youtube standup video.

Alright. People…lets quiet down now…I think we are back on track, this will go out this morning and with any luck I will have another couple of Posts this week that will bury this trainwreck and we can lurch onwards towards Christmas.

YouTube Preview Image

© 2009-2012 the Wakefield Doctrine All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright