Comments for the Wakefield Doctrine http://wakefielddoctrine.com the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:08:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Comment on Hey! I thought you said I would be famous by now and someone else would write these things by <img alt="" src="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/18ed41d1bc3967f8d9a5087f23ee5d80?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> Cpt21Miss http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/09/04/hey-i-thought-you-said-i-would-be-famous-by-now-and-someone-else-would-write-these-things/#comment-1712 Cpt21Miss Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:08:16 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5074#comment-1712 Correct. Mr. Pierce was a master of understatement. The perfect ensemble player. 60w Sunn Solaris, if memory serves, with a 4-12 cab. ' 68 Strat. No effects, maybe a touch of reverb. Sunn stuff was extremely tanklike. I ended up with the cab, loaded it with EV's, and blew one out in Misquamicut one night. Had to take out 8000 machine screws to get at it. Good times. Correct. Mr. Pierce was a master of understatement. The perfect ensemble player.
60w Sunn Solaris, if memory serves, with a 4-12 cab. ‘ 68 Strat. No effects, maybe a touch of reverb.
Sunn stuff was extremely tanklike. I ended up with the cab, loaded it with EV’s, and blew one out in Misquamicut one night. Had to take out 8000 machine screws to get at it. Good times.

]]> Comment on Hey! I thought you said I would be famous by now and someone else would write these things by <img alt="" src="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b322c8e66483ebc881461521aa111be3?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/09/04/hey-i-thought-you-said-i-would-be-famous-by-now-and-someone-else-would-write-these-things/#comment-1711 clarkscottroger Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:31:09 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5074#comment-1711 hey roger...this song is courtsey of your band, <del datetime="2010-09-04T22:32:08+00:00">Windblown</del>.... <del datetime="2010-09-04T22:33:01+00:00">Windbored</del>....no I know! Windborne! I think this was a tune that was in the first set list as a showcase for Craig Pierce, give his <strong><em>clarklike</em></strong> personality a chance to do some projectile nonchalance hey roger…this song is courtsey of your band, Windblown…. Windbored….no I know! Windborne! I think this was a tune that was in the first set list as a showcase for Craig Pierce, give his clarklike personality a chance to do some projectile nonchalance

]]> Comment on We know why you are reluctant to Comment by <img alt="" src="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/254a6f0a54e6306ab4da102369915391?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> AKH http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/08/31/we-know-why-you-are-reluctant-to-comment/#comment-1698 AKH Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:10:50 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5025#comment-1698 (...now lets try to remember this right...)(...the note from AKH was totally explicit {no <strong><em>scott</em></strong> there, huh?} {{lol}}....anyway supposed to move one of these to another spot...(damn! think this supposed to go here..) (Better make it look on purpose!...) If you would all help Ms AKH welcome a new Reader! Ms AKH? Take it from here... I’m excited to announce that we have a new reader/follower to the <strong>Wakefield Doctrine</strong> (the theory of …) Let’s give CY a nice warm welcome! She is the newest self-proclaimed <strong><em>clark</em></strong>. We look forward to hearing from you CY! (…now lets try to remember this right…)(…the note from AKH was totally explicit {no scott there, huh?} {{lol}}….anyway supposed to move one of these to another spot…(damn! think this supposed to go here..)

(Better make it look on purpose!…)

If you would all help Ms AKH welcome a new Reader! Ms AKH? Take it from here…

I’m excited to announce that we have a new reader/follower to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of …) Let’s give CY a nice warm welcome! She is the newest self-proclaimed clark.
We look forward to hearing from you CY!

]]> Comment on You have more to say, Ms AKH? or do you have Three (3) more things to say by <img alt="" src="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/254a6f0a54e6306ab4da102369915391?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> AKH http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/08/30/you-have-more-to-say-ms-akh-or-do-you-have-three-3-more-things-to-say/#comment-1697 AKH Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:03:37 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5019#comment-1697 WELCOME CY!!! WELCOME CY!!!

]]> Comment on Readers and Visitors? may I introduce the Raison-ettes and a roger by <img alt="" src="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/254a6f0a54e6306ab4da102369915391?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> AKH http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/09/01/readers-and-visitors-the-raison-ettes-and-a-roger/#comment-1696 AKH Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:59:15 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5043#comment-1696 I'm excited to announce that we have a new reader/follower to the <strong>Wakefield Doctrine</strong> (the theory of ...) Let's give CY a nice warm welcome! She is the newest self-proclaimed <strong><em>clark</em></strong>. We look forward to hearing from you CY! I’m excited to announce that we have a new reader/follower to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of …) Let’s give CY a nice warm welcome! She is the newest self-proclaimed clark.
We look forward to hearing from you CY!

]]> Comment on Readers and Visitors? may I introduce the Raison-ettes and a roger by <img alt="" src="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/254a6f0a54e6306ab4da102369915391?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> AKH http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/09/01/readers-and-visitors-the-raison-ettes-and-a-roger/#comment-1692 AKH Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:49:32 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5043#comment-1692 lmfao!! that video was hysterical! good catch... and no, i'm not laughing at the one you appear in. but that was good too! oh to live in a place called pleasantville. man, talk about opening season for we of the scottian persuasion. lmfao!! that video was hysterical! good catch… and no, i’m not laughing at the one you appear in. but that was good too! oh to live in a place called pleasantville. man, talk about opening season for we of the scottian persuasion.

]]> Comment on Readers and Visitors? may I introduce the Raison-ettes and a roger by <img alt="" src="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/03fb6f50f148e9893ddbd411c3d30df2?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> Downspring#1 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/09/01/readers-and-visitors-the-raison-ettes-and-a-roger/#comment-1690 Downspring#1 Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:33:33 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5043#comment-1690 I do not mean to pick on <strong><em>rogers</em></strong>. Really. Revelations lately as a result of "life" stuff. (yes, at least I think I have something constructive to offer) Keep in mind this comes from a clark... <em><strong>rogers</strong></em> do not seem to like it when others, and by others I mean people they know/are close to) breach the fence line, stray from the field - do not conform. <em><strong>rogers</strong></em> are uncomfortable with "otherness" - anything that does not conform with the mold/formula. Now, for <strong><em>clarks</em></strong>, nonconformity is never a conscious choice it just is. Even when <strong><em>clarks</em></strong> try to "fit in" there is always something to set them apart be it ever so small a thing in their own eyes. Take an office setting (<strong><em>rogerian</em></strong>) for example. A female <strong><em>clark</em></strong> may be able to pull off the dress code required but doesn't quite complete it because of her choice of footwear or her jewelry. Accessories are always a dead giveaway. (Oh, and the hair in most cases) But I digress - back to <em><strong>rogers</strong></em> and their difficulty in understanding when people are not like "everybody else". It differs from the <strong><em>scottian</em></strong> perspective. <strong><em>scotts</em></strong> may recognize the "standing out in a crowd" but they simply don't care. Not really. <strong><em>scotts</em></strong> are about crowd control, about dominance, being the "one in charge", the one "looked up to". <strong><em>scotts</em></strong> are the leader(s) of the clique. Having said that, I do not mean to imply that <strong><em>scotts</em></strong> will not try and "be higher" over <strong><em>clarks</em></strong> but they know instinctively it will be more of a challenge(than <em><strong>rogers</strong></em>). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAiyrees0uM I do not mean to pick on rogers. Really.
Revelations lately as a result of “life” stuff.
(yes, at least I think I have something constructive to offer) Keep in mind this comes from a clark…
rogers do not seem to like it when others, and by others I mean people they know/are close to) breach the fence line, stray from the field – do not conform. rogers are uncomfortable with “otherness” – anything that does not conform with the mold/formula. Now, for clarks, nonconformity is never a conscious choice it just is. Even when clarks try to “fit in” there is always something to set them apart be it ever so small a thing in their own eyes. Take an office setting (rogerian) for example. A female clark may be able to pull off the dress code required but doesn’t quite complete it because of her choice of footwear or her jewelry. Accessories are always a dead giveaway. (Oh, and the hair in most cases)
But I digress – back to rogers and their difficulty in understanding when people are not like “everybody else”. It differs from the scottian perspective. scotts may recognize the “standing out in a crowd” but they simply don’t care. Not really. scotts are about crowd control, about dominance, being the “one in charge”, the one “looked up to”. scotts are the leader(s) of the clique. Having said that, I do not mean to imply that scotts will not try and “be higher” over clarks but they know instinctively it will be more of a challenge(than rogers).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAiyrees0uM

]]> Comment on We know why you are reluctant to Comment by <img alt="" src="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/03fb6f50f148e9893ddbd411c3d30df2?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> Downspring#1 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/08/31/we-know-why-you-are-reluctant-to-comment/#comment-1670 Downspring#1 Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:01:42 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5025#comment-1670 An example of <strong><em>the theory of clarks, scotts</em></strong> and <strong><em>rogers</em></strong> from your timeshare days would/could be instructional. Perhaps begin with the resident <strong><em>scott</em></strong>(s). (I find them easiest to identify.) An example of the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers from your timeshare days would/could be instructional. Perhaps begin with the resident scott(s). (I find them easiest to identify.)

]]> Comment on We know why you are reluctant to Comment by <img alt="" src="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/254a6f0a54e6306ab4da102369915391?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> AKH http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/08/31/we-know-why-you-are-reluctant-to-comment/#comment-1668 AKH Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:55:51 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5025#comment-1668 Oh yeah, and we can't forget about you Studley (the UK). We are happy to see that you are a somewhat regular reader too (no, of course we're not spying on you - take a look on the right at "Live Feed".) But regrettably we have yet to hear from you. What's going on across the pond? And I promise Glenn won't say anything obnoxious about the name Studley. He's just being a typical in your face, let's make a joke at someone else's expense, scottian self. Right Glenn? Play nice. Oh yeah, and we can’t forget about you Studley (the UK). We are happy to see that you are a somewhat regular reader too (no, of course we’re not spying on you – take a look on the right at “Live Feed”.) But regrettably we have yet to hear from you. What’s going on across the pond? And I promise Glenn won’t say anything obnoxious about the name Studley. He’s just being a typical in your face, let’s make a joke at someone else’s expense, scottian self. Right Glenn? Play nice.

]]> Comment on We know why you are reluctant to Comment by <img alt="" src="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/254a6f0a54e6306ab4da102369915391?s=12&d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D12&r=G" class="avatar avatar-12 photo" height="12" width="12" style=" border: 1px solid;border-color: #000000;"/> AKH http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/08/31/we-know-why-you-are-reluctant-to-comment/#comment-1667 AKH Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:49:28 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=5025#comment-1667 Bonjour la France! Qu'est-ce qui arrive ? Joli vous voir de nouveau. Que haveth vous pour dire ? Bonjour la France! Qu’est-ce qui arrive ? Joli vous voir de nouveau. Que haveth vous pour dire ?

]]>