Comments for the Wakefield Doctrine » <title> http://wakefielddoctrine.com (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) Mon, 25 May 2015 20:39:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2 Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by Stephanie @ Life, Unexpectedly http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44933 Mon, 25 May 2015 20:39:27 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44933 Ok, I see the cookie monster in the picture.. A stylized version, but the cookie monster nevertheless :-)

]]>
Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by Kristi Campbell - findingninee http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44931 Mon, 25 May 2015 15:41:27 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44931 Look out Una! Also you look great in the grass. So much better than the snow.

]]>
Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44929 Mon, 25 May 2015 12:21:33 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44929 here at the Doctrine, from the very beginning, we’ve been wrestling with the problem of how best to ‘represent’ the fact of three characteristic worldviews and the idea that, while only one (of these) manifests as our personal reality, the ‘other two’ are potential(ly) available to us all… the holographic model seems to work best. I live in the reality of the Outsider, but behind/within/implicit of that are the other two worlds… tricky as all get out, but, in my own practice, I try to be less concerned with whether my expression of a particular idea holds together or can survey scrutiny than I am if (these) expressions can move my mind out of the life-long routine way of perceiving the world around me
ya know?

]]>
Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44927 Mon, 25 May 2015 12:05:38 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44927 no, not really… lol (I mentioned to Reta, below) that it’s not that your people are not alert, but I’ll be you a trillion dollars* that if we showed a bunch of optical illusions (‘trop d oils’ photos and drawings and such) to people, the scotts would be less impressed by them than the other two. (clarks totally loves those kinds of things, but scotts… sure, you guys ‘see it’ but it’s abstract-subjective…. you’re more the touch-feel-if-it-runs-away-chase-it-if-it-runs-towards-you-get-ready-to-fight type…. guys walking up stairs upside down, interesting, but not real enough)

hey! what am I thinking!! this is the age of the internet lets see some of these optical whatsiseses

* not to exaggerate

]]>
Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44926 Mon, 25 May 2015 12:01:15 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44926 I’m thinking: clarks see it first, rogers ‘note’ it but focus on something else and scotts don’t see it until it’s pointed out (only because it’s not really enough, them being the ever-alert of the three personality types)

]]>
Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44925 Mon, 25 May 2015 11:59:01 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44925 hey! great idea (the paw print flooring pattern)… we have that!

(a cool thing, more easily observable in large dogs?), watch them shaking off water. It’s not simply ‘shake-until-dry’… the shaking starts at their head and moves down their backs to the tail…in a kind of spiral motion… very cool

]]>
Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44924 Mon, 25 May 2015 11:55:27 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44924 very true… (‘lovingly patient’ might have been a good caption)
lol

]]>
Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by Yvonne http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44922 Mon, 25 May 2015 10:40:01 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44922 That flower man is so cool!
And you are right – it’s all about perspective. Life. The universe. Everything. All about perspective.
I read this weekend that some scientists think that the universe is holographic – so it’s divided into billions of pieces and in each is the entire universe – so we are all the entire universe.
I kinda love that perspective!

]]>
Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by christine http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44921 Mon, 25 May 2015 10:12:31 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44921 Thank you for the close-up. I had not a clue what you were talking about. Shocking, I know. ;)

]]>
Comment on TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘it’s all in the perspective… by chance or by design!’ by Reta Jayne http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2015/05/23/ttot-the-wakefield-doctrine-its-all-in-the-perspective-by-chance-or-by-design/#comment-44919 Mon, 25 May 2015 08:58:28 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=25935#comment-44919 Haha. I totally saw the flower man — but not until I read the caption on the first photo! Too funny! :) He looks like he is waving Una down, though. . . Not so menacing — just awkward, maybe. LOL.

]]>