TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

‘Phyllis and Una and Home’

This week’s TToT is gonna be on the photo-centric side. Josie Two-Shoes opens the doors to this bloghop and invites one and all to share the things that inspire the state/emotion/experience of gratitude that we might care to share.

(We interrupt this intro narrative to exert editorial authority and usurp an Item, for this purpose referred to as, ‘Man! Look at what wikipedia says about the editorial we!” Otherwise it will be considered Item 7)

A nosism the use of ‘we’ to refer to oneself

Main article: Royal we
A common example is the royal we (Pluralis Majestatis), which is a nosism employed by a person of high office, such as a monarch, earl, or pope.

The editorial we is a similar phenomena

The editorial we is a similar phenomenon, in which editorial columnists in newspapers and similar commentators in other media refer to themselves as wewhen giving their opinions. Here, the writer has once more cast himself or herself in the role of spokesman: either for the media institution who employs him, or more generally on behalf of the party or body of citizens who agree with the commentary.

Similar to the editorial we is the practice common in scientific literature of referring to a generic third person by we (instead of the more common one or the informal you):

  • By adding three and five, we obtain eight.
  • We are therefore led also to a definition of “time” in physics. — Albert Einstein

“We” in this sense often refers to “the reader and the author”, since the author often assumes that the reader knows certain principles or previous theorems for the sake of brevity (or, if not, the reader is prompted to look them up), for example, so that the author does not need to explicitly write out every step of a mathematical proof.

1, 2, 3:

 

4, 5, 6:

Gratitude for the others in the interworld, both as individuals and groups: You should visit Finish the Sentence Friday, they’ve got the most basic of all prompts this week. We’re in the very beginning of Open Enrollment at the Gravity Challenge… come over, sign up and lose!* It’s no secret that we talk about the nature of reality and such, a fair amount in the Doctrine. Friend of the Doctrine, Cynthia is the person to go to when you, ‘want to see it in stores’1. Stop over to Intuitive and Spiritual and tell her the Doctrine sent ya. And, finally if you gots a hankering to arrange words in new and surprising sequences, head for the Six Sentence Story, Denise and them will total blow yer mind.**

7, 8, 9:

Sorry, only 8 and 9 left (see above)

‘The Wakefield Doctrine’ spanning the globe.
Friend of the Doctrine, Alex somewhere in Greece invoking the Rite of Hat.

 

THIS SPACE AVAILABLE (If any Reader wants to participate, however are not certain, in light of this Post, they are yet comfortable contributing to such a…. literary mélange as is this here bloghop here, feel free to send in your Grat Items and we’ll be happy to post them in this space.

10: Secret Rule 1.3

 

 


*  Gravity Challenge joke. Despite what a cursory inspection might lead you to believe, the emphasis in the Challenge in not losing weight; it’s practicing the art of altering one’s reality. (No! Really, ask anyone!) We participate by sending in photos of the readout of our scales each morning (‘cept Sunday). Kristi’s Rule is the best illustration of this principle, i.e. the photo (that is a requirement) need show only that portion of the number that you would post. It’s about change, not status. Ya know?

1) To ‘see it in stores’ is an old colloquial expression for, ‘ok, I get the concept, and sure, the Wakefield Doctrine offers a fun, useful and productive perspective on the world around me, but sometimes I’d like to gain reference points that, while helping me learn to live better in the here and now, has less of the ‘raised eyebrow factor’. Talking about mindfulness and centering oneself in the here and now does not make people look at you funny. Exclaiming, “Wow! She is such a scott!” or “Man, rogers sho do keep us on our toes, emotional-combatively-speaking”, tends to inspire the look.”

** it’s a writing challenge, one prompt word, six sentences, fun.

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Cynthia says:

    Wait, there’s a rite of hat!? I mean I’d seen the hat, and I thought it was your particular form of clarkism, but WHERE can I get such a hat!? OMG John and I would wear them all the time! lol. Do tell!
    And “if you want to see it in stores” – HAHA. I love that. :D
    Now for that video. I can see just who controls the goings-on of the household. Una won the lottery when she got to be part of your family. Hehe. Where’d you go on a walk TO? I mean, the video shows the ride in the car so…where’d you go? To the beach? To the park? Will there be a follow-up vid? lol
    Oh and I like that word: nosism. I like it when I discover words that are just fun to say: bebeche is one I discovered recently. It’s the candle drip protector on those little candles that they give out at various ceremonies. I went around saying it to myself for hours. HAHA. Bay-bay-chay! HAHA.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      ah! The Rite of Hat!

      https://wp.me/pRP3W-1l9

      Hats perhaps it is time to Bring Back the Hats! lol

      • Yes! Bring back the hats! There’s a new generation of folks be needing some Wakefield Doctrine hats. Nothing more enjoyable than claiming a place by rite of hat!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      We went for a ‘walk’…for me (and Una) that means in the car (about 2 miles of rural roads and condominiums) at 5 to 7 mph (they recommend for good health, a brisk walk) her window open. lol
      I maintain that, at least half the fun dogs get from going on walks is/are the smells and scents and such. As you might note in the video, she has her nose out the window through most of the filming (Una, not Phyllis).

  2. Kristi says:

    “Phyllis and Una and home” is probably the best caption ever. Family just about sums it up! Hi, Phyllis! Nice to see you went on the walk, too. :-)

    • phyllis says:

      Thank you – It is very nice to be part of the “we”.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      This is true… (usually our walks on Friday when I get home from work, but we thought… Sunday Drive…classic!)

  3. valj2750 says:

    We like it, we like it, we like it, we do. And by that, I mean we and you.

  4. Pat B says:

    When I come to your site, I can always be assured of being exposed to new words (to me) and new ways of looking at things. Such an enjoyable Sunday morning walk (ride) with your lovely back seat driver.

  5. May says:

    Cracked me up to fire up the video and see that Phyllis had ceded the front seat to Una. We know who is in charge around there!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      lol there is that…But, you know, Phyllis has a convertible so she can sniff the air anytime she wants, Una gets to only once a week, at least from a moving car.