Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Holy Smokes! the Post-a-Day Challenge is down to the final week! Well, not your traditional 7 Days Week… but still! How time flies when you’re engaged in something being done before an audience/spectators.

“I think I finally understand now.  I am a thinking feeling actor.  Thank you for the lesson.” Pattie

“…your post-a-day this month has given me opportunity to understand this WD much better.”  Lisa

“Shake it down now!”

“Of course now I’m thinkin’ I wish I knew then what I know now, Doctrinistically speaking. How life would have been different!” Comment to yesterday’s Post

I *was* a 12 year old girl last friday. Yelled it down the netball court and everything (when questioned on my energy levels “how old ARE you?”)

“…oh wait… you are THE clark … right?”

ok! lets have a little fun! (“…no, seriously! “..I’m fun, I can do silly things!”)

Give us your opinion of the predominant worldview of the people who wrote the Comments above. I’ll give you a little start…. we would appear to have all three predominant worldviews represented… (but if that is incorrect* then somebody’s got a pretty strong secondary aspect! lol)

So tell us what you think…or feel or need to do about it.

* yes, it is possible for me to be wrong….when identifying a person’s worldview (predominant and secondary/tertiary). Not overly likely, of course…lol  but, in all seriousness ask anyone who has been on a Friday Night vidchat or a Saturday Night Drive…. challenges and proofs, evidence and indications are all part of the process that goes into the process and that’s how we learn the Doctrine  (ex: “…she is such a scott”  “she is not!!”, “now, I believe you may have overlooked a couple of suggestive reactions to a situation.” “Your ass is on fire! No frickin way she’s a scott…clearly that girl is a scott!”)