simple principles the Wakefield Doctrine (it’s not difficult to learn, it’s fun to use and it can be so very helpful) | the Wakefield Doctrine simple principles the Wakefield Doctrine (it’s not difficult to learn, it’s fun to use and it can be so very helpful) | the Wakefield Doctrine

simple principles the Wakefield Doctrine (it’s not difficult to learn, it’s fun to use and it can be so very helpful)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

degas_1886_the_tub_720

Lets get the week of A2Z started:

Lizzi:   the Letter is L  the topic is  Letters

zoe:  our Mistress of Information,  Monday is L-Day

Jean:  short, sweet   and always fun   (the hell with Esperanto… this is the vocabulary of the future.)

Saturday, as I was paying for the day’s gasoline, I saw that there was a clark and a roger behind the counter.  (The clark) said, “what philosophical advice do you have for us today?1” I paused briefly then said, ‘there is a personality theory that accounts for everyone in the world in 3 personality types, go online to ‘the Wakefield Doctrine dot com.’ He repeatasked the url2, so I did, ‘www dot Wakefield Doctrine dot com’. And left the store.

the Wakefield Doctrine is a tool in the form of a perspective. It is a way of looking at the behavior of the people in our lives that will allow us an understanding, (of that person), that we would not have otherwise. With the Wakefield Doctrine, you will know more about the other person than they know about themselves and, with the proper use of the Doctrine, you need never again find yourself thinking, “I really thought I knew them better than that, why on earth would they go and say a thing like that?”

the Wakefield Doctrine is a tool in the form of perspective. It is a way of looking at ourselves that will allow us the, (possibility), of seeing our selfs differently than we have learned to believe (we are). With the Wakefield Doctrine we are in the position to understand how ‘we relate ourselves to the world around us’. With the Wakefield Doctrine, if you are willing to suspend a lifetime of certainty, you can recognize that your strengths are your own and your weaknesses are habit, both as simple to change (or enhance) and as nearly as impossible to alter, (having spent a lifetime practicing them.)

the Wakefield Doctrine is a tool that is fun and useful, silly and profound and totally yours to use as you are inclined. The girl that seems to be looking at you in class is less of a ‘oh-man-if-I-only-had-the-nerve’, the boss who, as much as you work and worry and try to do your job like everyone else, always manages to get you off-balance, that mechanic in the garage where you take your car, you know he’s not too bright but somehow you end up leaving the place with the impression that he and the other 2 people working there are laughing at you, the Teacher who you know is very highly qualified, yet she doesn’t seem to be able to not take sides with your child and after all! ‘he-is-your-child-you-are-certainly-the-person-most-qualified-to-know-what-he-is-capable-of’ and the Physician who insists on talking to you like you were a child, it’s your disease, why don’t they see that it is not about statistical averages and bell-shaped curves!

the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them.

 

1) anytime I’ve been in the store and the clark was the only working, I would do a throw-away clark thing, something weird in terms of observation, focused mostly on the un-reliability of reality and such, but the main effect was in my open enjoyment of being weird (in contrast to my public appearance, serious older businessman thing, ya know?). My kick was watching for the look of recognition as the other clark heard thoughts that they tend to keep to themselves (the private thoughts that we all have that we have learned to keep to ourselves, except when around friends). (and even then…)

2) when you repeat what the person said, just adding the interrogative lilt   “…just adding the interrogative lilt?”

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. jny_jeanpretty says:

    FRRRISTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!

  2. jny_jeanpretty says:

    this is very interesting as ALWAYS! and I am now going back to retake the tests! jenay cherise

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      cherise!! (there was this girl in college, lived in the same dorm…. oh man! better ask the Progenitor roger, he’ll give you the cleaned up and modified version of (past) reality that is meant for the world, but not clarks… (no, she was not a scott).

      but still, sshe …

      what? oh yeah, the Doctrine welll

  3. zoe says:

    I love that story! (The one in the post…not Roger’s horndog version of whatever….)

    Hi Cherise! I loved meeting you yesterday!

    The impromptu vid chat was tons-o-fun!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      zoe

      lol

      (luckily roger has a stealth-fan approach to this here blog here, he will know what’s going on, never admit to being a regular Reader…but will reply when maximum impact is possible).

  4. lrconsiderer says:

    How was your day off FB?

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      not bad… still have a few hours to go… I’ll try you on the hangouts… (text version!) lol