“shit, I shoulda stayed at the Bus Station” the Wakefield Doctrine (sorry the first part of this Title belongs to a different Post entirely) | the Wakefield Doctrine “shit, I shoulda stayed at the Bus Station” the Wakefield Doctrine (sorry the first part of this Title belongs to a different Post entirely) | the Wakefield Doctrine

“shit, I shoulda stayed at the Bus Station” the Wakefield Doctrine (sorry the first part of this Title belongs to a different Post entirely)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

what-if-tyler-durden-wrote-the-supposed-rules-of-menswear-02

Break Time!!  Yeah, we know what you’re thinking,* “hey  enough of the heavy introspection, already!  we came here for a break from our daily routines, ya know? The Wakefield Doctrine advertises itself as being a personality theory that’s unique, useful and fun.  Lets see some of that fun!”

Well, we all know that if it’s fun you’re after (and you’re not concerned with the price), there’s only one worldview to go to… the scottian worldview. scotts!!!  (‘Say it baritone and you can hear the police sirens wailing, say it contralto and you’ll surely be praying‘).

We all have a scottian friend. There’s currently a TV commercial for Las Vegas and is premised on that guy, the one we all knew growing up who always had to push it. To go a bit faster, to take a bit more of a risk than is absolutely necessary. juvenile detention facilities structure their business models on the young scottian males’ natural proclivity for anticipating consequences.

And….and! lets not forget that the Wakefield Doctrine is gender neutral! ( ya gotta admit, in most cultures, the male is permitted a greater latitude in (their) choices of expression of drives and instincts and such, the scottian personality type is that of the predator and so they pretty high on the aggressiveness and impulsivity of action. if you are female, in most cultures, they will frown upon you going around arm wrestling, punching your subordinates on the shoulder and saying ‘fuck!’ a lot. fortunately for you (the scottian female) there are ….alternative forms of expression).

if you’re a clark you have always had a scottian friend, if you’re a roger you have never been able to avoid having a scottian friend and if you are a scott you’ve known of other scotts in your life.  you know them because as a scott:

  • they must establish ‘ranking’ in any and every social environment… you will spot the scott because they will alway first ‘work the room’, going from person to person, small group to small group and push everyone on the shoulder (literally and/or figuratively), by doing this they will establish their place in rank
  • they will command attention (or better, for the sake of the rogers) they will simply assume dominance
  • in conversational style:  a clark will listen to you talk, a roger will let you talk…a scott will make you talk
  • females will be identified as ‘tomboys’ early in life (‘from ages 5 to breasts’); with puberty, scottian females come into their own… (short form: most cultures do not permit the female members expressing aggressiveness physically)
  • you will have a clarklike friend, who you will consider a friend because they  do not act like prey nor do they act like as another scott
  • they will be total pushovers for a person who appreciates their mind ( in males it is best to admire their creativity… in females anything not involving their bodies will work  lol)
  • in social conflicts, as in dog training, to feel fear is to admit defeat
  • they are mercurial in temperament and loyal to friends and ferocious as adversaries

But they’re fun! It is easy to say, ‘hey of course we like scotts! they’re active and like to do things and are entertaining. whats not to like?’  True. But, this being the Wakefield Doctrine, we owe to ourselves to look a little deeper.

scotts are impulsive …and this appeals to us, albeit on an unconscious level, they live in the here and now!  (you remember the tale of the fiddle playing grasshopper?? tell me that, before you got to the ‘oh-so-correct-and-this-is-how-you-should-live-your-live sledge hammer ending…. tell me that you didn’t think of the grasshopper as the ‘good guy’! to varying degrees, we all would like to believe that, all we need do is throw off the cares and responsibility and life could be so much more….  and that’s true.

scotts are certain…  and this is why they are ‘natural leaders’… (the Doctrine saying is) ‘scotts are frequently wrong, never uncertain’.  people all too often equate certainty with wisdom

scotts represent what any of us would demonstrate as a ‘personality type’ if we found ourselves in the reality of the predator at a very early age and had to develop coping skills and strategies

scotts are attractive and aggravating, they are natural showmen/show-women, they see the audience as would a hungry lion a pack of gazelles  …

in the history of Man:  scotts are the conquerors, the explorers,  they are Alexander the Great (but not Julius Caesar) they are Genghis Khan (but not Charlemagne)  they are George Patton (but not Dwight Eisenhower)  scotts are cops but not firefighters….scotts are surgeons but not physicians … scotts are prima ballerinas but not Rockettes  …scotts are leaders but not Rulers

If you have made it this far…this is the link to the page on scotts

Hey want to see a scott in action?  watch this here video…everything you need to know about how to recognize a scott (there’s Robert DeNiro as the clark and some other guy as the roger).

 

 

* well duh!  this is the Wakefield Doctrine!

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. So the redhead dude is the scott, yes? I mean, I can totally see my bro in law doing something like that, haha. And I would be DeNiro – JUST like that. Actually, no I would be sitting over there sweating and freaking out wondering if he was going to ever use that gun, in which case, just drag me outta there so I can die…of suspense and wanting too much peace. LOL

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      Cyndi

      Very good observation on the ‘power of scotts’… it is at the very heart of what they present their opponent…undefined action… ya gotta love that fact that in the face-to-face our scott is clearly physically the lesser of the two (the other, bigger guy is a roger…he even invokes referential authority! ‘hey, come one! I’m on the job’ ) but the scott is coming at him with violence totally implied but not defined…no limits…any reasonable person give way to a scott in this situation.

  2. skipcote says:

    So the scott is the one pissing on his territory. Skip

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      zoe

      I thought you would get a kick from the first part of the scene, when Caruso (our scott) says to his friend DeNiro (our clark)… ‘here, hold this’ lol god! the price we pay to maintain our Outsider status!! it so has nothing to do with courage, it has nothing to do with being afraid, it has everything to do with fear.

      • skipcote says:

        I watch the clip the first time I was here but I didn’t mention it because I laughed through a good part of it….it was the part you predicted I was laughing at DeNiros predicament! Lol

        • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

          zoe

          totally un-intended by the screenwriters, I’m sure. But speaking of the Doctrine…lol

          the eyes! when it comes to identifying characteristics the eyes are wonderful (of course, I mean eyes in the most comprehensive sense…how the person regards the world around them)
          scotts are the easiest: focus, attention, alertness…that of the predator
          clarks not so easy until you know what to look for: slight gap behind the eyes, preoccupation, reflection
          rogers the most difficult of the three…they can be attentive but…and this is here the 2 videos are priceless under-stress a roger will look for the herd…glancing left and right…you got to be alert but both the guy here and James Spader demonstrate this very cool characteristic

  3. Strong freakin secondary – show-off, tomboy, leader, funny, bit of an asshole. I reckon I got this. BOOM!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      Lizzi

      …lol the blogosphere is probably, to a certain degree, self-selecting for clarks with secondary scottian aspect (otherwise we would be satisfied with reading)

      • I would tend to agree with Lizzi. Probably also why a disproportionate amount of clarks hop over here.
        Had to come back and show that vid to hubsy. Intense…and awesome.
        The price we pay for being clarks? We have to hold the gun? That part does confuse me a little. I don’t know the context of the story, so I’m not sure why scott dude gave clark dude the gun…

  4. christine says:

    It just makes me laugh when I read your posts about scotts. The entire way through, I think, “Hey! I do that!” And I can picture different situations at school/church/soccer and the people there. I know who the scotts are, because they are the ones I seem to “duke it out with” regularly. There are quite a few “predators” in my circle of friends. Most are male.

    Loved the video. It really helps to put some examples in here to give us some visuals. I completely get the scott, but I’m still working on the others. Picturing real life rogers and clarks is harder. I need to pay more attention to it, but that requires me to keep my mouth shut. Not an easy task in a group of people. :)